Common ICD-10 Coding Errors Found in Audits: Part 2
The following is the second installment in a six-part coding education series from our Executive Director of Education, Patricia Maccariella-Hafey, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CIRCC. In this series, Patricia reviews common ICD-10 CM and PCS coding errors discovered in audits and how they may impact reimbursement. Part two in our series takes a closer look at Glasgow Coma Scale, Periprosthetic Fractures, and Rehabilitation Unit Principal Diagnosis.
4. Glasgow Coma Scale
Glasgow Coma Scale; click to enlarge
Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) codes should now be reported when documented on any case where there is monitoring of the central nervous system regardless of the medical condition requiring the monitoring.
At a minimum, report the initial score documented on presentation to your facility.
The documentation of the coma scale may be by other clinicians involved in the care of the patient (EMT, nursing) and not only by the physician.
5. Periprosthetic Fractures
This was a problem even before ICD-10 in determining S code vs T84.04 and sequencing.
The specific traumatic or pathological fracture code by site is coded and assigned first, followed by a code in category M87. Category M97 is assigned for a true periprosthetic fracture. Category code T84. is reserved for true prosthesis malfunction or problems.
The good news: Code T84.04 has been deleted.
An example of coding a traumatic periprosthetic fracture of the lower end of the right femur is:
- S72.401A, Unsp fracture of lower end of right femur, initial encounter for closed fracture
- M97.01XAA, Periprosthetic fracture around internal prosthesis of right hip joint, initial encounter
- Appropriate external cause codes
6. Rehabilitation Unit Principal Diagnosis
Assigning the reason for admission to rehab as PDX was introduced in ICD-10; there is no equivalent to old ICD-9-CM V57 codes.
Here’s a scenario:
86 year old with mobility and selfcare dysfunction after hospitalization for CHF exacerbation. The patient has a history of multiple spinal fusion and laminectomy procedures. The patient continues to require inpatient rehabilitation for functional upgrade return to community living. He requires PT and OT for at least 3 hours daily 5 days a week to address his debility, focusing on improving mobility ambulation and ADLs. Patient’s functional goals are to get his strength back after his last few months of surgeries and illnesses and return home.
So what is the PDX for the UB04? Debility? CHF?
- There seems to be conflicts with Coding Clinic 4Q 2013 page 129 and Coding Clinic 4Q 2012 pages 90-99:
- CC 4Q 2013: patient transferred to rehab unit for OT and PT following prolonged stay at a LTCH where patient was weaned from mechanical vent. Patient received rehab due to deconditioning and debility. The provider documented that the patient presented with complex medical problems that included chronic hypoxic respiratory failure, COPD, diabetic neuropathy and obesity.
- Assign J96.11, Chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia as PDX. This is the underlying reason for and deconditioning and the underlying reason is coded as the principal diagnosis.
- Coding Clinic 4Q 2012 pages 90-98 states that when a patient is admitted to LTC nursing home for “deconditioning” coders should code the symptoms of deconditioning such as gait disturbance, weakness, etc.
- CC 4Q 2013: patient transferred to rehab unit for OT and PT following prolonged stay at a LTCH where patient was weaned from mechanical vent. Patient received rehab due to deconditioning and debility. The provider documented that the patient presented with complex medical problems that included chronic hypoxic respiratory failure, COPD, diabetic neuropathy and obesity.
So which is correct?
The rehabilitation principal diagnosis would be congestive heart failure. Refer to the following Coding Clinics for additional guidance.
- When an injury is reason for rehabilitation
- Coding Clinic 4Q 2013 pages 90-98 and 128-129
- If a patient is transferred to LTC (or rehab) following hospital stay for treatment of fracture or injury such as pelvic and clavicular fracture, assign the S32.9XXD with 7th character of D, subsequent encounter.
- Review Coding Clinic 3Q 2015 page 36
- Discusses IRF-PAI vs UB04 coding
- Review Coding Clinic 1Q 2015 page 21
- Rehabilitation services are not considered active treatment and the encounter should be reported with the appropriate 7th character for “subsequent encounter.”
Another common question is on OCG II PDX K. admissions/encounters for rehabilitation. When the purpose for the admission/encounter is rehabilitation, sequence first the code for the condition for which the service is being performed. For example, for an admission/encounter for rehabilitation for right-sided dominant hemiplegia following a cerebrovascular infarction, report code I69.351, Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, as the first-listed or principal diagnosis.
If the condition for which the rehabilitation service is no longer present, report the appropriate aftercare code as the first-listed or principal diagnosis. For example, if a patient with severe degenerative osteoarthritis of the hip, underwent hip replacement and the current encounter/admission is for rehabilitation, report code Z47.1, Aftercare following joint replacement surgery, as the first-listed or principal diagnosis. (See Section I.C.21.c.7, Factors influencing health states and contact with health services, Aftercare.)
Rehabilitation procedure examples; click to enlarge
In some cases adding the rehabilitation ICD-10-PCS code when paired with a diagnosis code that is included within MDC 23 will change your DRG to 945/946. Many diagnosis codes assigned for rehab patients do not end up in MDC 23.
Here’s a scenario:
Patient admitted to rehab with S02.119D, Unspecified fracture of occiput, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, is included in MDC 8. Adding a procedure code such as F0706GZ (Therapeutic Exercise Treatment of Neurological System – Head and Neck using aerobic endurance and conditioning equipment) would NOT lead to DRG 945/946.
However, assigning Z51.89, Encounter for other specified aftercare or Z44.9, Encounter for fitting and adjustment of other external prosthetic devices with this procedure will lead to DRG 945/946.
The information contained in this coding advice is valid at the time of posting. Readers are encouraged to research subsequent official guidance in the areas associated with the topic as they can change rapidly.
Popular Posts
OIG Takes Notice of Coding Errors
Back in April, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) published a report detailing its findings from a review of two groups of high-risk diagnosis codes, acute stroke and major depressive disorder. The objective was to determine whether selected diagnosis codes submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for use in CMS’s risk adjustment program complied with Federal requirements.
Coder Q&A with Pat Mac: Coding for Newborn
There seems to be differences of opinions on the issue of a 40w0day gestation Can you clarify if P08.21 should be assigned for 40w0day infant or if it would not be assigned unless the infant’s gestation age was 40w1day or greater?
Query Tip: When to Query for Sepsis
Coders may find situations where a patient is documented as meeting SIRS or sepsis criteria, or has some clinical indicators reflective of possible sepsis, but the physician never documents sepsis as a diagnosis. Should the coder always query for sepsis in these instances?
Coder Q&A with Pat Mac: Principal Dx Selection
In this example, would it be appropriate to code the complication code T82.03XA, Leakage of heart valve prosthesis, initial encounter as the principal diagnosis over the HFpEF (heart failure exacerbation) code?
Find Your Routine: Track Trends to Save Time
We interviewed our most productive coders and reviewers, asking them what steps they take to find a rhythm that works for them. This week, we talked with Kerry Atkins, CDIP, CCS‑P, COC, CPC, CPCO, CPMA, CEMC, COBGC, RMB, Physician Services Consultant at HIA, about the steps she takes to find her routine.
Subscribe to our weekly newsletter
Latest News
OIG Takes Notice of Coding Errors
Back in April, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) published a report detailing its findings from a review of two groups of high-risk diagnosis codes, acute stroke and major depressive disorder. The objective was to determine whether selected diagnosis codes submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for use in CMS’s risk adjustment program complied with Federal requirements.
Coder Q&A with Pat Mac: Coding for Newborn
There seems to be differences of opinions on the issue of a 40w0day gestation Can you clarify if P08.21 should be assigned for 40w0day infant or if it would not be assigned unless the infant’s gestation age was 40w1day or greater?
Query Tip: When to Query for Sepsis
Coders may find situations where a patient is documented as meeting SIRS or sepsis criteria, or has some clinical indicators reflective of possible sepsis, but the physician never documents sepsis as a diagnosis. Should the coder always query for sepsis in these instances?
Coder Q&A with Pat Mac: Principal Dx Selection
In this example, would it be appropriate to code the complication code T82.03XA, Leakage of heart valve prosthesis, initial encounter as the principal diagnosis over the HFpEF (heart failure exacerbation) code?
Find Your Routine: Track Trends to Save Time
We interviewed our most productive coders and reviewers, asking them what steps they take to find a rhythm that works for them. This week, we talked with Kerry Atkins, CDIP, CCS‑P, COC, CPC, CPCO, CPMA, CEMC, COBGC, RMB, Physician Services Consultant at HIA, about the steps she takes to find her routine.
Keeping a Healthy CMI
A higher CMI corresponds to increased consumption of resources and increased cost of patient care, resulting in increased reimbursement to the facility from government and private payers, like CMS. We know that documentation directly impacts coding.
Coding Tip: Spinal Procedures Reported in Addition to the Fusion
With the implementation of ICD-10-PCS more codes were developed in order to accurately report procedures. Spinal fusion coding is still a problematic coding issue and at times, even a coder’s nightmare. Coders often report only the code for the fusion thinking that one code would include all of the other procedures that are performed.
Coder Q&A with Pat Mac: Procedure Coding for a Breast Procedure
Answer: I would code 0HPT0NZ for removal of tissue expander from right breast, open and change 0HPT0JZ, removal of synthetic substitute from right breast, open, for removal of the acellular dermal matrix to 0HPT0KZ, Removal of nonautologous tissue substitute from right breast, open approach.
Coding Tip: “Code First” Instructional Notes in ICD-10-CM
There are certain conditions that have instructional notes in the ICD-10-CM tabular/coding conventions that guide the coder in sequencing. This is especially true when the condition has a common manifestation or underlying conditions of a chronic disease. If there is a “code first” note in the tabular, the coder should follow this instruction and sequence the underlying etiology or chronic condition first followed by the manifestation as an additional diagnosis.
Find Your Routine: Tools to Tackle Unpredictable Days
When it comes to coding and documentation, finding your own rhythm can lead to positive results. For our series, Find Your Routine, we interviewed our most productive coders and reviewers and asked them what steps they take to find a rhythm that works for them. This week, we talked with Meghan Schumacher, CPC, CPMA, Provider Coding Consultant at Health Information Associates, Inc., about the steps she takes to find her routine.
Time is Money
Last year, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) performed an investigation that found, “between 2014 and 2016, Medicare Advantage organizations overturned 75% of their preauthorization and payment denials upon appeal,” which is why, at HIA, we always advise our clients to engage in the appeals process.
Query Tip: Query for Acute Kidney Injury (AKI)
There may be instances where a coder will suspect the patient has acute kidney injury (AKI), but the physician has failed to document the diagnosis. In another scenario, the physician may have made the diagnosis, but there is a question of clinical validity. In either case, a query would be justified.
IPPS Proposed Rule: CC/MCC Designation Changes
Changes to CC/MCC designations included in the proposal could have a potentially dramatic effect on casemix. The presence of a major complication or comorbidity (MCC) or complication or comorbidity (CC) generally is representative of a patient that requires more resources.
It Only Takes One Code
How many times have you heard “it only takes one code to get the claim paid”? With the emphasis on the severity of illness and the move toward value-based reimbursement in today’s healthcare climate, it is more important than ever for coders to report all applicable diagnoses. There are three important pieces: what the provider documents, how to the coder interprets that documentation and codes it, and then how it is extrapolated.
How to Reduce Claims Denials
The reimbursement landscape is already a complicated one – and the highly-complex claims denials process only adds fuel to the fire. A denied claim is one that has been determined by a payor to be in appropriate. Once a coding specialist amends the errors on a rejected claim, they can resubmit it for consideration. The time-intensive process has a significant impact on the cash flow for any setting in the healthcare environment. They are also very costly to appeal.
Query Tip: Query for Clinical Validation
When a practitioner documents a diagnosis that does not appear to be supported by the clinical indicators in the health record, a coder has four choices: (1) Code the diagnosis; (2) Ignore the diagnosis; (3) Generate a query to confirm clinical validation of a diagnosis; (4) Follow the facility’s escalation policy for clinical validation.
$30M Settlement for Medicare Advantage Upcoding
A California-based healthcare services provider and several of its affiliates have agreed to pay $30 million to resolve allegations they submitted inaccurate information about the health status of beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare Advantage Plans, according to the Department of Justice.
National Volunteer Week with HIA
Happy National Volunteer Week! This week we celebrate the impact volunteer work has on building stronger communities. We know that our staff have a positive impact while they’re on the job, and we are proud to share a few ways our #PeopleBehindTheNumbers are taking time to volunteer in their own local communities.
Challenges Facing ASCs in 2019
Scrutiny of coding compliance in the growing ambulatory surgical center (ASC) market has increased in recent years from both Medicare and private payers. This will only increase as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) moves towards value-based care.
Coding Tip: Acute Renal/Kidney Failure/Injury vs Dehydration as a Principal Diagnosis
Patients being admitted for acute renal failure due to dehydration have been happening for many, many years now. Typically what happens is a patient gets dehydrated for one reason or another. Once dehydration sets in, it can quickly start to affect many body organs. This can lead to acute renal/kidney failure/injury.
Are you making a $12.5M mistake?
In December 2018, a Pennsylvania for-profit hospital and health system, and its CEO agreed to pay a total of $12.5 million to settle allegations they submitted false claims to Medicare and other federal health care programs for orthopedic surgeries. The settlement resolves allegations that top executives exploited a loophole – AKA modifier 59 – that allowed them to double bill federal healthcare payers for surgeries and ignored coding consultants who advised them that they were improperly billing.
Find Your Routine: Don’t Leave Any Loose Ends
When it comes to coding and documentation, finding your own rhythm can lead to positive results. For our series, Find Your Routine, we interviewed our most productive coders and asked them what steps they take to find a rhythm that works for them. This week, we talked with Zahra Ghahremani, CCS, Coding Specialist at Health Information Associates, about the steps she takes to find her routine.
Query Tip: Be Consistent with Query Format
All queries require at least two elements – clinical indicators and a query question. Coders can also include multiple choice options for response or leave the query open-ended for a free text response. The order in which these elements are listed in a query is open to coder or facility preference.
Coding Tip: Unspecified Condition Codes and Combination Codes
One area that coders struggle with is when to report a separate condition code when an already assigned combination code includes the condition. For example, if an obstetric patient is admitted and delivers, and the physician documents “obstetric patient delivered with anemia,” should both code O99.02 Anemia complicating childbirth and D64.9, Anemia, unspecified be coded or should only O99.02 be assigned?
Find Your Routine: Set a Pattern, Follow it
When it comes to coding and documentation, finding your own rhythm can lead to positive results. For our series, Find Your Routine, we interviewed our most productive coders and asked them what steps they take to find a rhythm that works for them. This week, we talked with Donna Cowan, RHIT, CCS, Coding Specialist at Health Information Associates, about the steps she takes to find her routine.
Query Tip: Choosing Reasonable Options for Response
The key to choosing reasonable options for a query response is to remember that the query must stand alone. Any clinical indicators supporting the options must be included in the query itself. In this week’s Query Tip, we provide examples of two queries in which the options for response are not reasonable based on clinical indicators used by coder.
Coding Tip: Obstetric Tidbits for PCS
Last week, we looked at tidbits for reporting the ICD-10-CM codes for pregnancy/obstetric records. Now we will look at some for the ICD-10-PCS reporting of these records. In reporting the appropriate ICD-10-PCS codes a coder must know what is included in the terminology of products of conception (POC).
American Heart Month 2019
Chances are, we all know someone affected by heart disease and stroke, because about 2,300 Americans die of cardiovascular disease each day, an average of 1 death every 38 seconds. But together we can change that.
Coding Tip: Pregnancy, Childbirth, and the Puerperium Tidbits
There was a time when coding delivery records was considered simple. Many times, these types of records were given to the newer coders. However, as coding becomes more complex, this is no longer the case. With the implementation of ICD-10-CM came more codes for very detailed and specific issues that occur during pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium.