Common ICD-10 Coding Errors Found in Audits: Part 2
The following is the second installment in a six-part coding education series from our Executive Director of Education, Patricia Maccariella-Hafey, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CIRCC. In this series, Patricia reviews common ICD-10 CM and PCS coding errors discovered in audits and how they may impact reimbursement. Part two in our series takes a closer look at Glasgow Coma Scale, Periprosthetic Fractures, and Rehabilitation Unit Principal Diagnosis.
4. Glasgow Coma Scale
Glasgow Coma Scale; click to enlarge
Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) codes should now be reported when documented on any case where there is monitoring of the central nervous system regardless of the medical condition requiring the monitoring.
At a minimum, report the initial score documented on presentation to your facility.
The documentation of the coma scale may be by other clinicians involved in the care of the patient (EMT, nursing) and not only by the physician.
5. Periprosthetic Fractures
This was a problem even before ICD-10 in determining S code vs T84.04 and sequencing.
The specific traumatic or pathological fracture code by site is coded and assigned first, followed by a code in category M87. Category M97 is assigned for a true periprosthetic fracture. Category code T84. is reserved for true prosthesis malfunction or problems.
The good news: Code T84.04 has been deleted.
An example of coding a traumatic periprosthetic fracture of the lower end of the right femur is:
- S72.401A, Unsp fracture of lower end of right femur, initial encounter for closed fracture
- M97.01XAA, Periprosthetic fracture around internal prosthesis of right hip joint, initial encounter
- Appropriate external cause codes
6. Rehabilitation Unit Principal Diagnosis
Assigning the reason for admission to rehab as PDX was introduced in ICD-10; there is no equivalent to old ICD-9-CM V57 codes.
Here’s a scenario:
86 year old with mobility and selfcare dysfunction after hospitalization for CHF exacerbation. The patient has a history of multiple spinal fusion and laminectomy procedures. The patient continues to require inpatient rehabilitation for functional upgrade return to community living. He requires PT and OT for at least 3 hours daily 5 days a week to address his debility, focusing on improving mobility ambulation and ADLs. Patient’s functional goals are to get his strength back after his last few months of surgeries and illnesses and return home.
So what is the PDX for the UB04? Debility? CHF?
- There seems to be conflicts with Coding Clinic 4Q 2013 page 129 and Coding Clinic 4Q 2012 pages 90-99:
- CC 4Q 2013: patient transferred to rehab unit for OT and PT following prolonged stay at a LTCH where patient was weaned from mechanical vent. Patient received rehab due to deconditioning and debility. The provider documented that the patient presented with complex medical problems that included chronic hypoxic respiratory failure, COPD, diabetic neuropathy and obesity.
- Assign J96.11, Chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia as PDX. This is the underlying reason for and deconditioning and the underlying reason is coded as the principal diagnosis.
- Coding Clinic 4Q 2012 pages 90-98 states that when a patient is admitted to LTC nursing home for “deconditioning” coders should code the symptoms of deconditioning such as gait disturbance, weakness, etc.
- CC 4Q 2013: patient transferred to rehab unit for OT and PT following prolonged stay at a LTCH where patient was weaned from mechanical vent. Patient received rehab due to deconditioning and debility. The provider documented that the patient presented with complex medical problems that included chronic hypoxic respiratory failure, COPD, diabetic neuropathy and obesity.
So which is correct?
The rehabilitation principal diagnosis would be congestive heart failure. Refer to the following Coding Clinics for additional guidance.
- When an injury is reason for rehabilitation
- Coding Clinic 4Q 2013 pages 90-98 and 128-129
- If a patient is transferred to LTC (or rehab) following hospital stay for treatment of fracture or injury such as pelvic and clavicular fracture, assign the S32.9XXD with 7th character of D, subsequent encounter.
- Review Coding Clinic 3Q 2015 page 36
- Discusses IRF-PAI vs UB04 coding
- Review Coding Clinic 1Q 2015 page 21
- Rehabilitation services are not considered active treatment and the encounter should be reported with the appropriate 7th character for “subsequent encounter.”
Another common question is on OCG II PDX K. admissions/encounters for rehabilitation. When the purpose for the admission/encounter is rehabilitation, sequence first the code for the condition for which the service is being performed. For example, for an admission/encounter for rehabilitation for right-sided dominant hemiplegia following a cerebrovascular infarction, report code I69.351, Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, as the first-listed or principal diagnosis.
If the condition for which the rehabilitation service is no longer present, report the appropriate aftercare code as the first-listed or principal diagnosis. For example, if a patient with severe degenerative osteoarthritis of the hip, underwent hip replacement and the current encounter/admission is for rehabilitation, report code Z47.1, Aftercare following joint replacement surgery, as the first-listed or principal diagnosis. (See Section I.C.21.c.7, Factors influencing health states and contact with health services, Aftercare.)
Rehabilitation procedure examples; click to enlarge
In some cases adding the rehabilitation ICD-10-PCS code when paired with a diagnosis code that is included within MDC 23 will change your DRG to 945/946. Many diagnosis codes assigned for rehab patients do not end up in MDC 23.
Here’s a scenario:
Patient admitted to rehab with S02.119D, Unspecified fracture of occiput, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, is included in MDC 8. Adding a procedure code such as F0706GZ (Therapeutic Exercise Treatment of Neurological System – Head and Neck using aerobic endurance and conditioning equipment) would NOT lead to DRG 945/946.
However, assigning Z51.89, Encounter for other specified aftercare or Z44.9, Encounter for fitting and adjustment of other external prosthetic devices with this procedure will lead to DRG 945/946.
The information contained in this coding advice is valid at the time of posting. Readers are encouraged to research subsequent official guidance in the areas associated with the topic as they can change rapidly.
Popular Posts
Part 14: Spinal Fusion Coding — Spinal Fusion Series Summary
We have finished with the step-by-step coding tidbits on coding of spinal fusions. If you were not able to catch Parts 1-13 of this series focused on spinal fusions, please visit hiacode.com/topics/series/spinal-fusion-coding/.
Part 13: Spinal Fusion Coding — Harvesting of Autograft for Spinal Fusion
In Part 12, we focused on intra-operative peripheral neuro monitoring used during spinal fusion surgery. In Part 13, we are going to focus on harvesting of autograft and is it coded. Remember in Part 6, we learned that autograft is bone from the patient.
Part 12: Spinal Fusion Coding — Intra-Operative Peripheral Neuro Monitoring
In Part 11, we focused on identifying the computer assisted navigation used during spinal fusion surgery. In Part 12, we are going to focus on intra-operative peripheral neuro monitoring.
Part 11: Spinal Fusion Coding — Computer Assisted Navigation
In Part 10, we focused on identifying whether or not hardware from a previous spinal fusion is coded. In Part 11, we are going to discuss computer assisted navigation.
Part 10: Spinal Fusion Coding — Removing Hardware from Previous Fusion
In Part 9, we focused on identifying if decompression was also performed and if so, on which body part. In Part 10, we are going to focus on identifying if hardware was removed from a previous fusion site.
Subscribe to our weekly newsletter
Latest News
Part 14: Spinal Fusion Coding — Spinal Fusion Series Summary
We have finished with the step-by-step coding tidbits on coding of spinal fusions. If you were not able to catch Parts 1-13 of this series focused on spinal fusions, please visit hiacode.com/topics/series/spinal-fusion-coding/.
Part 13: Spinal Fusion Coding — Harvesting of Autograft for Spinal Fusion
In Part 12, we focused on intra-operative peripheral neuro monitoring used during spinal fusion surgery. In Part 13, we are going to focus on harvesting of autograft and is it coded. Remember in Part 6, we learned that autograft is bone from the patient.
Part 12: Spinal Fusion Coding — Intra-Operative Peripheral Neuro Monitoring
In Part 11, we focused on identifying the computer assisted navigation used during spinal fusion surgery. In Part 12, we are going to focus on intra-operative peripheral neuro monitoring.
Part 11: Spinal Fusion Coding — Computer Assisted Navigation
In Part 10, we focused on identifying whether or not hardware from a previous spinal fusion is coded. In Part 11, we are going to discuss computer assisted navigation.
Part 10: Spinal Fusion Coding — Removing Hardware from Previous Fusion
In Part 9, we focused on identifying if decompression was also performed and if so, on which body part. In Part 10, we are going to focus on identifying if hardware was removed from a previous fusion site.
Part 9: Spinal Fusion Coding — Was A Decompression Done During Spinal Fusion?
In Part 8, we focused on identifying if a discectomy was performed, and if so, if it was a partial or a total discectomy. In Part 9, we are going to focus on identifying if a decompression was performed, and if so, was it of the spinal cord, spinal nerves or both?
Part 8: Spinal Fusion Coding — Discectomy During Spinal Fusion
In Part 7, we focused on identifying any instrumentation that may be used during a spinal fusion. In Part 8, we are going to focus on identifying if a discectomy is performed and if this is an excision or a resection of the disc.
Part 7: Spinal Fusion Coding — Identify Any Instrumentation or Device Used
In Part 6, we focused on identifying the type of bone graft product used for the spinal fusion. In Part 7, we are going to focus on identifying any instrumentation or device used.
Part 6: Spinal Fusion Coding — Identify the Type of Bone Graft Used for Fusion
In Part 5, we focused on identifying the approach being used for the spinal fusion. In Part 6, we are going to focus on identifying the type of bone graft used for the spinal fusion.
Part 5: Spinal Fusion Coding — Identifying the Approach Being Used for Fusion
In Part 4, we focused on determining the spinal column being fused. In Part 5, we are going to focus on identifying what approach is being used to complete the spinal fusion (anterior, posterior or both).
HIA Launches Buddy Up Program for New Hires
This past year, HIA implemented “Buddy Up,” a program designed to help the new hire have a smooth transition into their new HIA roles with the assistance of a “buddy.” What is a Buddy? The Buddy is simply a peer who can guide the new hire in order to make them feel more comfortable. We are very proud of this program and have many success stories that we would like to share. Take a look at the wonderful feedback we have received below.
Part 4: Spinal Fusion Coding — Identifying the Column Being Fused
In Part 3, we focused on determining the level of the fusion(s) and how to determine the number of vertebrae fused. In Part 4, we are going to focus on identifying which column is being fused (anterior, posterior or both).
Part 3: Spinal Fusion Coding — Determine the Level(s) or Region of Fusion and Number of Vertebrae Fused
In Part 1, we learned the diagnoses associated with the need for spinal fusions, and in Part 2 the need to identify if the fusion is an initial or refusion of the vertebrae. In Part 3, we are going to focus on determining the level(s) of fusion, as well as the number of vertebrae fused.
Part 2: Spinal Fusion Coding — Initial Fusion or Refusion
In Part 2, we are going to look at the differences between initial fusion and a refusion. In ICD-9, there were specific codes to show if the fusion was an initial fusion, or if it was a refusion. In ICD-10-PCS, initial fusions and refusion procedures are coded to the same root operation “fusion.”
Part 1: Spinal Fusion Coding — Diagnoses Responsible
This is Part 1 of a 14 part series focusing on education for spinal fusions. Spinal fusion coding is a tough job for coders. There are so many diseases/disorders that result in the need for spinal fusion, and even more choices in reporting the ICD-10-PCS codes.
What’s the Best Defense? A Good Offense
The official definition from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) states that a Medicare overpayment is a payment that exceeds amounts properly payable under Medicare statutes and regulations. When Medicare identifies an overpayment, the amount becomes a debt you owe the Federal government.
Query Tip: Writing a Query Question – Simple and Concise is the Key
The question asked in a physician query may be the most important element of the document. Query questions need to be as simple and concise as possible. The physician should have no doubt what the coder is asking.
Coding Tip: Coding Complications of Transplanted Organs
Coding complications of transplanted organs has always been a coding dilemma. With the implementation of ICD-10-CM that didn’t change. However, coders have multiple directives to help in determining what a complication of the transplant is vs. non-transplant conditions and diseases.
Find Your Routine: Take Advantage of Educational Opportunities
We interviewed our most productive coders, reviewers and members of our education team, asking them what steps they take to find a rhythm that works for them. This week, we talked with Beth Martilik, MA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, Assistant Director of Education, about the steps she takes to find her routine.
Coding Tip: Atrial Fibrillation
With the implementation of ICD-10-CM came more codes for reporting many different conditions and diseases, and atrial fibrillation is one of those. For many years there was only one code available for reporting this condition, even when the physician further specified the type of atrial fibrillation that the patient had. In ICD-10-CM, there are four codes to report atrial fibrillation.
Coder Q&A with Pat Macc: Mucoid Casts and Mucus Plugs
We have a case where the physician removes mucoid casts found during bronchoscopy. We have also seen mucus plugs removed during bronchoscopy. The MD performs bronchial washings then removes a large amount of tenacious and thick mucoid casts via bronchoscopy. Is this coded drainage, extirpation or excision? What body part is used?
Query Tip: How to Be More Efficient
The key to making the query process more efficient is to look for words or documentation while reviewing the record that may signal a potential query opportunity and to note the finding at that time. By the time a coder reaches the end of a record, documentation may have been found to eliminate the need for the query.
Coder Q&A with Pat Macc: Metastatic Cancer
Question: This patient is noted to have “Lymphangitic carcinomatosis of lungs with mediastinal lymph nodes.” How would I code the diagnosis? Would I code metastatic cancer to the lung (C78.01) or metastatic cancer to the lymph nodes (C77.1)?
Coder Q&A with Pat Macc: Collapse of an Endograft
This would be considered a “mechanical” complication of the stent graft since the MD states it is a fracture of the endograft and it is folded over on itself. I would change T82.898A TO T82.598A for Other mechanical complication of other cardiac and vascular devices and implants, initial encounter. I did not use “displacement” because the surgeon did not state that the graft was displaced, only that it collapsed upon itself causing obstruction.
Find Your Routine: Be Flexible, Not Frustrated
We interviewed our most productive coders and reviewers, asking them what steps they take to find a rhythm that works for them. This week, we talked with Valerie Abney, CDIP, RHIT, CCS, about the steps she takes to find her routine.
Coding Tip: Periprosthetic Fracture Reporting and Sequencing
Osteoporosis alone is responsible for over a million fractures every year. Stress fractures are not as common but they do occur. There are more than 1 million total joint replacements in the U.S. each year, so there was a need to create codes for injuries that occur around or near the prosthesis. These are called “periprosthetic” fractures.
OIG Takes Notice of Coding Errors
Back in April, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) published a report detailing its findings from a review of two groups of high-risk diagnosis codes, acute stroke and major depressive disorder. The objective was to determine whether selected diagnosis codes submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for use in CMS’s risk adjustment program complied with Federal requirements.
Coder Q&A with Pat Macc: Coding for Newborn
There seems to be differences of opinions on the issue of a 40w0day gestation Can you clarify if P08.21 should be assigned for 40w0day infant or if it would not be assigned unless the infant’s gestation age was 40w1day or greater?
Query Tip: When to Query for Sepsis
Coders may find situations where a patient is documented as meeting SIRS or sepsis criteria, or has some clinical indicators reflective of possible sepsis, but the physician never documents sepsis as a diagnosis. Should the coder always query for sepsis in these instances?