Coding Tip: Spinal Procedures Reported in Addition to the Fusion
Kim Carrier RHIT, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P
Director of Coding Quality Assurance
AHIMA Approved ICD-10-CM/PCS Trainer
With the implementation of ICD-10-PCS more codes were developed in order to accurately report procedures. Spinal fusion coding is still a problematic coding issue and at times, even a coder’s nightmare. Coders often report only the code for the fusion thinking that one code would include all of the other procedures that are performed. Let’s take a look at a couple of the most common missed procedures associated with spinal fusions coding.
Decompression of the spinal cord/nerve
Coding decompression procedures separately will depend on the documentation by the physician of what body part is being decompressed/released and if there is a distinct surgical objective. If the laminectomy (many times called a decompression) is only performed to reach the site of the planned spinal fusion, then no additional code would be reported. This is true even if the decompression is at the same level as the fusion. The operative note should indicate what is being released/decompressed (spinal cord/nerve). Look for terms such as stenosis, compression, decompression, myelopathy, and radiculopathy to name a few. These are terms that may be hints that a decompression was needed and completed to address a specific diagnosis.
The root operation used to report the decompression is “release.” The definition of release in ICD-10-PCS is “freeing a body part from an abnormal physical constraint by cutting or by use of force.” This means that the restraining tissue may be removed but none of the body part being compressed is taken out. In the case of spinal cord/nerve root compression, the body part that is being freed is the spinal cord or the nerve roots. Whatever is compressing these can be removed to release the compression. The release of spinal cord is only coded once since the spinal cord is classified as a single body part (per spinal level such as cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and lumbosacral). The specific ICD-10-PCS code will depend on the level of the spine the procedure is being performed on.
Discectomy—Excision or Resection
This is performed to remove herniated intervertebral disk in the spine. When a disk is herniated, it may cause pain and numbness due to the material compressing the spinal nerves and/or spinal cord. Most often, the surgeon will only remove a portion of the disk material that is causing the compression or “pinching the nerve.” This would be coded with the root operation “excision.” The definition of excision in ICD-10-PCS is “cutting out or off, without replacement, a portion of a body part.” If the surgeon does remove the entire disk, this is coded with the root operation “resection.” The definition of resection in ICD-10-PCS is “cutting out or off, without replacement, all of a body part.” The discectomy is most often coded in addition to the spinal fusion as there is almost always a separate and distinct diagnosis that requires the discectomy to be performed. The operative note should clearly state what the discectomy is being performed for, and if there is partial or total removal of the disc.
Other Less Common Procedures Missed
- Removal of internal fixation devices
- Computer assisted procedure—Stealth Navigation System
- Monitoring of peripheral nervous electrical activity, intraoperatively
- Removal of previous interbody fusion device
There are so many references available on coding of spinal fusions and associated procedures listed below, and this isn’t even all of them that are available. If in doubt, take time to research these. There are also action plans available that are an excellent reference for coding of spinal fusions.
ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, Fourth Quarter ICD-10 2015 Pages: 16-17
ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, First Quarter ICD-10 2019 Pages: 28-30
ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, Third Quarter ICD-10 2019 Page: 30
ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, Second Quarter ICD-10 2017 Pages: 23-24
ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, Second Quarter ICD-10 2015 Pages: 21-22, 34
ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, Second Quarter ICD-10 2016 Pages: 16-17
ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, Fourth Quarter ICD-10 2017 Pages: 76-77
ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, Second Quarter ICD-10 2014 Pages: 6-8
ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, First Quarter ICD-10 2013 Pages: 29-30
ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, Third Quarter ICD-10 2018 Page: 30
The information contained in this coding advice is valid at the time of posting. Viewers are encouraged to research subsequent official guidance in the areas associated with the topic as they can change rapidly.
In Part 5, we focused on identifying the approach being used for the spinal fusion. In Part 6, we are going to focus on identifying the type of bone graft used for the spinal fusion.
In Part 4, we focused on determining the spinal column being fused. In Part 5, we are going to focus on identifying what approach is being used to complete the spinal fusion (anterior, posterior or both).
This past year, HIA implemented “Buddy Up,” a program designed to help the new hire have a smooth transition into their new HIA roles with the assistance of a “buddy.” What is a Buddy? The Buddy is simply a peer who can guide the new hire in order to make them feel more comfortable. We are very proud of this program and have many success stories that we would like to share. Take a look at the wonderful feedback we have received below.
In Part 3, we focused on determining the level of the fusion(s) and how to determine the number of vertebrae fused. In Part 4, we are going to focus on identifying which column is being fused (anterior, posterior or both).
Part 3: Spinal Fusion Coding — Determine the Level(s) or Region of Fusion and Number of Vertebrae Fused
In Part 1, we learned the diagnoses associated with the need for spinal fusions, and in Part 2 the need to identify if the fusion is an initial or refusion of the vertebrae. In Part 3, we are going to focus on determining the level(s) of fusion, as well as the number of vertebrae fused.
In Part 2, we are going to look at the differences between initial fusion and a refusion. In ICD-9, there were specific codes to show if the fusion was an initial fusion, or if it was a refusion. In ICD-10-PCS, initial fusions and refusion procedures are coded to the same root operation “fusion.”
This is Part 1 of a 14 part series focusing on education for spinal fusions. Spinal fusion coding is a tough job for coders. There are so many diseases/disorders that result in the need for spinal fusion, and even more choices in reporting the ICD-10-PCS codes.
The official definition from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) states that a Medicare overpayment is a payment that exceeds amounts properly payable under Medicare statutes and regulations. When Medicare identifies an overpayment, the amount becomes a debt you owe the Federal government.
The question asked in a physician query may be the most important element of the document. Query questions need to be as simple and concise as possible. The physician should have no doubt what the coder is asking.
Coding complications of transplanted organs has always been a coding dilemma. With the implementation of ICD-10-CM that didn’t change. However, coders have multiple directives to help in determining what a complication of the transplant is vs. non-transplant conditions and diseases.
We interviewed our most productive coders, reviewers and members of our education team, asking them what steps they take to find a rhythm that works for them. This week, we talked with Beth Martilik, MA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, Assistant Director of Education, about the steps she takes to find her routine.
With the implementation of ICD-10-CM came more codes for reporting many different conditions and diseases, and atrial fibrillation is one of those. For many years there was only one code available for reporting this condition, even when the physician further specified the type of atrial fibrillation that the patient had. In ICD-10-CM, there are four codes to report atrial fibrillation.
We have a case where the physician removes mucoid casts found during bronchoscopy. We have also seen mucus plugs removed during bronchoscopy. The MD performs bronchial washings then removes a large amount of tenacious and thick mucoid casts via bronchoscopy. Is this coded drainage, extirpation or excision? What body part is used?
The key to making the query process more efficient is to look for words or documentation while reviewing the record that may signal a potential query opportunity and to note the finding at that time. By the time a coder reaches the end of a record, documentation may have been found to eliminate the need for the query.
Question: This patient is noted to have “Lymphangitic carcinomatosis of lungs with mediastinal lymph nodes.” How would I code the diagnosis? Would I code metastatic cancer to the lung (C78.01) or metastatic cancer to the lymph nodes (C77.1)?
Coding these can be challenging for coders when trying to decipher the operative notes and terms that are used. The physicians are still using the terms excision and resection interchangeably and review of the entire operative note is required to select the appropriate root operation. Remember, it is the coder’s responsibility to determine the root operation based on the details from the physician in the operative report.
This would be considered a “mechanical” complication of the stent graft since the MD states it is a fracture of the endograft and it is folded over on itself. I would change T82.898A TO T82.598A for Other mechanical complication of other cardiac and vascular devices and implants, initial encounter. I did not use “displacement” because the surgeon did not state that the graft was displaced, only that it collapsed upon itself causing obstruction.
We interviewed our most productive coders and reviewers, asking them what steps they take to find a rhythm that works for them. This week, we talked with Valerie Abney, CDIP, RHIT, CCS, about the steps she takes to find her routine.
Osteoporosis alone is responsible for over a million fractures every year. Stress fractures are not as common but they do occur. There are more than 1 million total joint replacements in the U.S. each year, so there was a need to create codes for injuries that occur around or near the prosthesis. These are called “periprosthetic” fractures.
Back in April, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) published a report detailing its findings from a review of two groups of high-risk diagnosis codes, acute stroke and major depressive disorder. The objective was to determine whether selected diagnosis codes submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for use in CMS’s risk adjustment program complied with Federal requirements.
There seems to be differences of opinions on the issue of a 40w0day gestation Can you clarify if P08.21 should be assigned for 40w0day infant or if it would not be assigned unless the infant’s gestation age was 40w1day or greater?
Coders may find situations where a patient is documented as meeting SIRS or sepsis criteria, or has some clinical indicators reflective of possible sepsis, but the physician never documents sepsis as a diagnosis. Should the coder always query for sepsis in these instances?
In this example, would it be appropriate to code the complication code T82.03XA, Leakage of heart valve prosthesis, initial encounter as the principal diagnosis over the HFpEF (heart failure exacerbation) code?
A higher CMI corresponds to increased consumption of resources and increased cost of patient care, resulting in increased reimbursement to the facility from government and private payers, like CMS. We know that documentation directly impacts coding.
Answer: I would code 0HPT0NZ for removal of tissue expander from right breast, open and change 0HPT0JZ, removal of synthetic substitute from right breast, open, for removal of the acellular dermal matrix to 0HPT0KZ, Removal of nonautologous tissue substitute from right breast, open approach.
There are certain conditions that have instructional notes in the ICD-10-CM tabular/coding conventions that guide the coder in sequencing. This is especially true when the condition has a common manifestation or underlying conditions of a chronic disease. If there is a “code first” note in the tabular, the coder should follow this instruction and sequence the underlying etiology or chronic condition first followed by the manifestation as an additional diagnosis.
When it comes to coding and documentation, finding your own rhythm can lead to positive results. For our series, Find Your Routine, we interviewed our most productive coders and reviewers and asked them what steps they take to find a rhythm that works for them. This week, we talked with Meghan Schumacher, CPC, CPMA, Provider Coding Consultant at Health Information Associates, Inc., about the steps she takes to find her routine.
Last year, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) performed an investigation that found, “between 2014 and 2016, Medicare Advantage organizations overturned 75% of their preauthorization and payment denials upon appeal,” which is why, at HIA, we always advise our clients to engage in the appeals process.
There may be instances where a coder will suspect the patient has acute kidney injury (AKI), but the physician has failed to document the diagnosis. In another scenario, the physician may have made the diagnosis, but there is a question of clinical validity. In either case, a query would be justified.