Part 14: Spinal Fusion Coding — Spinal Fusion Series Summary
Kim Carrier RHIT, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P
Director of Coding Quality Assurance
AHIMA Approved ICD-10-CM/PCS Trainer
We have finished with the step-by-step coding tidbits on coding of spinal fusions.
Spinal Fusion Series Summary
Most common diagnosis associated with the need for spinal fusion:
- Degenerative disc disease/degeneration
- Spinal stenosis/neurogenic claudication
- Herniated disc/slipped disc/ruptured disc
- Radiculopathy/pinched spinal nerve
- Pseudoarthrosis (requiring re-fusion)
- Injury resulting in damage to the initial fusion
- Complications of the initial area fused
In ICD-10-PCS, initial and refusions are coded to the same root operation “fusion”
Determining the level(s) fused and number of vertebrae:
- There are five regions of the spine: cervical (7), thoracic (12), lumbar (5), sacrum (5 or 6) and coccyx (4)
- Two adjacent vertebrae separated by an interspace is called a vertebral joint
- When multiple vertebral joints are involved in the spinal fusion, a separate procedure is coded for each vertebral joint that uses a different device and/or qualifier
Identifying the spinal column being fused:
- Anterior column (refers to the spine that is at the front of the body)
- Posterior column (refers to the spine that is at the back of the body)
- Both columns fused? Be sure and report ICD-10-PCS codes for both the anterior and posterior column spinal fusion
- Anterior and posterior columns may be fused via one incision without the need to turn the patient
What approach is being used for the spinal fusion?
- Is the surgeon going through the front of the body/abdominal area/flank or front of the neck?
- For anterior approach the patient will be in the supine position (face up) and the incision will be in the abdomen (or side), sternocleidomastoid, front of the neck (or side)
- For posterior approach the patient will be in the prone position (face down) and the incision will be in the back
- Combined approaches are sometimes used. When this occurs the operative note should describe turning the patient over. The patient will have an incision in the front (anterior) and in the back (posterior)
Types of bone graft used:
- Autograft—comes from the patient’s own bone
- Allograft—this is bone that comes from a cadaver or bone graft substitute/tissue bank
- A combination of autograft and allograft/bone graft substitute are often used at the same site to render the site immobile. There is a hierarchy to follow when combinations of devices are sued on the same vertebral joint. You can find this in the OCG for PCS 2019 Page, 7
Was instrumentation or devices used?
- While reading the operative note, look for terms such as rods, plates, screws, cages, hooks or cable to see if any instrumentation was used to stabilize the spine
- For the root operation of “fusion” to be coded during spinal fusion with instrumentation or devices used, bone graft or bone graft substitute must also be used. Insertion of instrumentation and/or devices alone does not constitute a spinal fusion
Was discectomy performed during spinal fusion?
- A discectomy is surgical removal of any herniated or damaged disc in yours spine
- Look for diagnoses such as radiculopathy, leg pain, arm pain, or myelopathy to name a few
- Discectomy is coded in ICD-10-PCS as an excision or a resection. Excisional discectomy is partial removal of the disc (removal of free fragments, removed the displaced disc, excised the disc or partial discectomy). Resection discectomy is total removal of the disc (total, complete, thorough or radical removal of the disc)
- Discectomy performed during spinal fusion is separately reportable
Was decompression done during spinal fusion?
- Look for terms such as release, laminectomy, or decompression in the operative note
- Determine if the spinal nerve root was released or the spinal cord
- If both, spinal nerves and spinal cord are released, both should be coded (only report once per spinal column level/region)
- Diagnoses that typically require decompression to be performed at the time of spinal fusion are spinal stenosis, claudication, radiculopathy and myelopathy
Can coders report the removal of hardware from a previous spinal fusion or is it included in the new fusion/refusion ICD-10-PCS code?
- YES! Removal of hardware from a previous spinal fusion should be coded in addition to the spinal fusion. The removal of the hardware has a separate objective than the fusion
- ICD-10-PCS codes would be assigned for each spinal column level/region that hardware is removed from. The new spinal fusion will include any new hardware that is used
Computer assisted navigation:
- Used very often during spinal fusion to enhance the accuracy of screw placement in posterior fusions and reduces the patient and staff’s exposure to radiation and reduces procedure time
- Look for terms in the operative note such as “O-arm” and “Stealth navigation” as these are the two most common used
Intra-operative peripheral neuro monitoring:
- This is used to reduce the number of postoperative neurological complications and replaces the neurological examination while the patient is under anesthesia
- Look for EMG, SSEP, and MEP in the operative note
Is harvesting of the autograft for spinal fusion coded separately or included in the spinal fusion code?
- YES—if the bone is removed at a different body site than the spinal fusion
- NO—if the bone is removed at the site of the spinal fusion
ICD-10-PCS Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting 2019
Coding Clinic, Second Quarter 2014: Page 6-7
Coding Clinic, Third Quarter 2013: Page 25
Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, First Quarter 2018: Page 8 & 22
Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, First Quarter 2017: Page 21
Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, Second Quarter 2017: Page 23
Coding Clinic, Third Quarter 2014: Page 30 & 36
Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, Fourth Quarter 2017: Page 70
Coding Clinic, Second Quarter 2015: Page 14
Coding Clinic, First Quarter 2015: Page 26
Coding Clinic, Second Quarter 2016: Page 6-7, 16
Coding Clinic, Second Quarter 1990: Page 27
Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, Fourth Quarter 2017: Pages 18 & 70
Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, First Quarter 2019: Pages 19, 28-30
Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, Second Quarter 2018: Pages 14-15, 22
Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, Third Quarter 2018: Pages 18 & 19, 30
Coding Clinic, First Quarter 2013: Pages 21, 25-29
Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, First Quarter 2016: Page 17
Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, Third Quarter 2017: Page 24
The information contained in this coding advice is valid at the time of posting. Viewers are encouraged to research subsequent official guidance in the areas associated with the topic as they can change rapidly.
In Part 12, we focused on intra-operative peripheral neuro monitoring used during spinal fusion surgery. In Part 13, we are going to focus on harvesting of autograft and is it coded. Remember in Part 6, we learned that autograft is bone from the patient.
In Part 11, we focused on identifying the computer assisted navigation used during spinal fusion surgery. In Part 12, we are going to focus on intra-operative peripheral neuro monitoring.
In Part 10, we focused on identifying whether or not hardware from a previous spinal fusion is coded. In Part 11, we are going to discuss computer assisted navigation.
In Part 9, we focused on identifying if decompression was also performed and if so, on which body part. In Part 10, we are going to focus on identifying if hardware was removed from a previous fusion site.
In Part 8, we focused on identifying if a discectomy was performed, and if so, if it was a partial or a total discectomy. In Part 9, we are going to focus on identifying if a decompression was performed, and if so, was it of the spinal cord, spinal nerves or both?
In Part 7, we focused on identifying any instrumentation that may be used during a spinal fusion. In Part 8, we are going to focus on identifying if a discectomy is performed and if this is an excision or a resection of the disc.
In Part 6, we focused on identifying the type of bone graft product used for the spinal fusion. In Part 7, we are going to focus on identifying any instrumentation or device used.
In Part 5, we focused on identifying the approach being used for the spinal fusion. In Part 6, we are going to focus on identifying the type of bone graft used for the spinal fusion.
In Part 4, we focused on determining the spinal column being fused. In Part 5, we are going to focus on identifying what approach is being used to complete the spinal fusion (anterior, posterior or both).
This past year, HIA implemented “Buddy Up,” a program designed to help the new hire have a smooth transition into their new HIA roles with the assistance of a “buddy.” What is a Buddy? The Buddy is simply a peer who can guide the new hire in order to make them feel more comfortable. We are very proud of this program and have many success stories that we would like to share. Take a look at the wonderful feedback we have received below.
In Part 3, we focused on determining the level of the fusion(s) and how to determine the number of vertebrae fused. In Part 4, we are going to focus on identifying which column is being fused (anterior, posterior or both).
Part 3: Spinal Fusion Coding — Determine the Level(s) or Region of Fusion and Number of Vertebrae Fused
In Part 1, we learned the diagnoses associated with the need for spinal fusions, and in Part 2 the need to identify if the fusion is an initial or refusion of the vertebrae. In Part 3, we are going to focus on determining the level(s) of fusion, as well as the number of vertebrae fused.
In Part 2, we are going to look at the differences between initial fusion and a refusion. In ICD-9, there were specific codes to show if the fusion was an initial fusion, or if it was a refusion. In ICD-10-PCS, initial fusions and refusion procedures are coded to the same root operation “fusion.”
This is Part 1 of a 14 part series focusing on education for spinal fusions. Spinal fusion coding is a tough job for coders. There are so many diseases/disorders that result in the need for spinal fusion, and even more choices in reporting the ICD-10-PCS codes.
The official definition from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) states that a Medicare overpayment is a payment that exceeds amounts properly payable under Medicare statutes and regulations. When Medicare identifies an overpayment, the amount becomes a debt you owe the Federal government.
The question asked in a physician query may be the most important element of the document. Query questions need to be as simple and concise as possible. The physician should have no doubt what the coder is asking.
Coding complications of transplanted organs has always been a coding dilemma. With the implementation of ICD-10-CM that didn’t change. However, coders have multiple directives to help in determining what a complication of the transplant is vs. non-transplant conditions and diseases.
We interviewed our most productive coders, reviewers and members of our education team, asking them what steps they take to find a rhythm that works for them. This week, we talked with Beth Martilik, MA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, Assistant Director of Education, about the steps she takes to find her routine.
With the implementation of ICD-10-CM came more codes for reporting many different conditions and diseases, and atrial fibrillation is one of those. For many years there was only one code available for reporting this condition, even when the physician further specified the type of atrial fibrillation that the patient had. In ICD-10-CM, there are four codes to report atrial fibrillation.
We have a case where the physician removes mucoid casts found during bronchoscopy. We have also seen mucus plugs removed during bronchoscopy. The MD performs bronchial washings then removes a large amount of tenacious and thick mucoid casts via bronchoscopy. Is this coded drainage, extirpation or excision? What body part is used?
The key to making the query process more efficient is to look for words or documentation while reviewing the record that may signal a potential query opportunity and to note the finding at that time. By the time a coder reaches the end of a record, documentation may have been found to eliminate the need for the query.
Question: This patient is noted to have “Lymphangitic carcinomatosis of lungs with mediastinal lymph nodes.” How would I code the diagnosis? Would I code metastatic cancer to the lung (C78.01) or metastatic cancer to the lymph nodes (C77.1)?
Coding these can be challenging for coders when trying to decipher the operative notes and terms that are used. The physicians are still using the terms excision and resection interchangeably and review of the entire operative note is required to select the appropriate root operation. Remember, it is the coder’s responsibility to determine the root operation based on the details from the physician in the operative report.
We interviewed our most productive coders and reviewers, asking them what steps they take to find a rhythm that works for them. This week, we talked with Valerie Abney, CDIP, RHIT, CCS, about the steps she takes to find her routine.
Osteoporosis alone is responsible for over a million fractures every year. Stress fractures are not as common but they do occur. There are more than 1 million total joint replacements in the U.S. each year, so there was a need to create codes for injuries that occur around or near the prosthesis. These are called “periprosthetic” fractures.
Back in April, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) published a report detailing its findings from a review of two groups of high-risk diagnosis codes, acute stroke and major depressive disorder. The objective was to determine whether selected diagnosis codes submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for use in CMS’s risk adjustment program complied with Federal requirements.
There seems to be differences of opinions on the issue of a 40w0day gestation Can you clarify if P08.21 should be assigned for 40w0day infant or if it would not be assigned unless the infant’s gestation age was 40w1day or greater?
Coders may find situations where a patient is documented as meeting SIRS or sepsis criteria, or has some clinical indicators reflective of possible sepsis, but the physician never documents sepsis as a diagnosis. Should the coder always query for sepsis in these instances?
In this example, would it be appropriate to code the complication code T82.03XA, Leakage of heart valve prosthesis, initial encounter as the principal diagnosis over the HFpEF (heart failure exacerbation) code?