Part 14: Spinal Fusion Coding — Spinal Fusion Series Summary
Kim Carrier RHIT, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P
Director of Coding Quality Assurance
AHIMA Approved ICD-10-CM/PCS Trainer
We have finished with the step-by-step coding tidbits on coding of spinal fusions.
Spinal Fusion Series Summary
Most common diagnosis associated with the need for spinal fusion:
- Degenerative disc disease/degeneration
- Spinal stenosis/neurogenic claudication
- Herniated disc/slipped disc/ruptured disc
- Radiculopathy/pinched spinal nerve
- Pseudoarthrosis (requiring re-fusion)
- Injury resulting in damage to the initial fusion
- Complications of the initial area fused
In ICD-10-PCS, initial and refusions are coded to the same root operation “fusion”
Determining the level(s) fused and number of vertebrae:
- There are five regions of the spine: cervical (7), thoracic (12), lumbar (5), sacrum (5 or 6) and coccyx (4)
- Two adjacent vertebrae separated by an interspace is called a vertebral joint
- When multiple vertebral joints are involved in the spinal fusion, a separate procedure is coded for each vertebral joint that uses a different device and/or qualifier
Identifying the spinal column being fused:
- Anterior column (refers to the spine that is at the front of the body)
- Posterior column (refers to the spine that is at the back of the body)
- Both columns fused? Be sure and report ICD-10-PCS codes for both the anterior and posterior column spinal fusion
- Anterior and posterior columns may be fused via one incision without the need to turn the patient
What approach is being used for the spinal fusion?
- Is the surgeon going through the front of the body/abdominal area/flank or front of the neck?
- For anterior approach the patient will be in the supine position (face up) and the incision will be in the abdomen (or side), sternocleidomastoid, front of the neck (or side)
- For posterior approach the patient will be in the prone position (face down) and the incision will be in the back
- Combined approaches are sometimes used. When this occurs the operative note should describe turning the patient over. The patient will have an incision in the front (anterior) and in the back (posterior)
Types of bone graft used:
- Autograft—comes from the patient’s own bone
- Allograft—this is bone that comes from a cadaver or bone graft substitute/tissue bank
- A combination of autograft and allograft/bone graft substitute are often used at the same site to render the site immobile. There is a hierarchy to follow when combinations of devices are sued on the same vertebral joint. You can find this in the OCG for PCS 2019 Page, 7
Was instrumentation or devices used?
- While reading the operative note, look for terms such as rods, plates, screws, cages, hooks or cable to see if any instrumentation was used to stabilize the spine
- For the root operation of “fusion” to be coded during spinal fusion with instrumentation or devices used, bone graft or bone graft substitute must also be used. Insertion of instrumentation and/or devices alone does not constitute a spinal fusion
Was discectomy performed during spinal fusion?
- A discectomy is surgical removal of any herniated or damaged disc in yours spine
- Look for diagnoses such as radiculopathy, leg pain, arm pain, or myelopathy to name a few
- Discectomy is coded in ICD-10-PCS as an excision or a resection. Excisional discectomy is partial removal of the disc (removal of free fragments, removed the displaced disc, excised the disc or partial discectomy). Resection discectomy is total removal of the disc (total, complete, thorough or radical removal of the disc)
- Discectomy performed during spinal fusion is separately reportable
Was decompression done during spinal fusion?
- Look for terms such as release, laminectomy, or decompression in the operative note
- Determine if the spinal nerve root was released or the spinal cord
- If both, spinal nerves and spinal cord are released, both should be coded (only report once per spinal column level/region)
- Diagnoses that typically require decompression to be performed at the time of spinal fusion are spinal stenosis, claudication, radiculopathy and myelopathy
Can coders report the removal of hardware from a previous spinal fusion or is it included in the new fusion/refusion ICD-10-PCS code?
- YES! Removal of hardware from a previous spinal fusion should be coded in addition to the spinal fusion. The removal of the hardware has a separate objective than the fusion
- ICD-10-PCS codes would be assigned for each spinal column level/region that hardware is removed from. The new spinal fusion will include any new hardware that is used
Computer assisted navigation:
- Used very often during spinal fusion to enhance the accuracy of screw placement in posterior fusions and reduces the patient and staff’s exposure to radiation and reduces procedure time
- Look for terms in the operative note such as “O-arm” and “Stealth navigation” as these are the two most common used
Intra-operative peripheral neuro monitoring:
- This is used to reduce the number of postoperative neurological complications and replaces the neurological examination while the patient is under anesthesia
- Look for EMG, SSEP, and MEP in the operative note
Is harvesting of the autograft for spinal fusion coded separately or included in the spinal fusion code?
- YES—if the bone is removed at a different body site than the spinal fusion
- NO—if the bone is removed at the site of the spinal fusion
ICD-10-PCS Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting 2019
Coding Clinic, Second Quarter 2014: Page 6-7
Coding Clinic, Third Quarter 2013: Page 25
Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, First Quarter 2018: Page 8 & 22
Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, First Quarter 2017: Page 21
Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, Second Quarter 2017: Page 23
Coding Clinic, Third Quarter 2014: Page 30 & 36
Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, Fourth Quarter 2017: Page 70
Coding Clinic, Second Quarter 2015: Page 14
Coding Clinic, First Quarter 2015: Page 26
Coding Clinic, Second Quarter 2016: Page 6-7, 16
Coding Clinic, Second Quarter 1990: Page 27
Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, Fourth Quarter 2017: Pages 18 & 70
Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, First Quarter 2019: Pages 19, 28-30
Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, Second Quarter 2018: Pages 14-15, 22
Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, Third Quarter 2018: Pages 18 & 19, 30
Coding Clinic, First Quarter 2013: Pages 21, 25-29
Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, First Quarter 2016: Page 17
Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, Third Quarter 2017: Page 24
The information contained in this coding advice is valid at the time of posting. Viewers are encouraged to research subsequent official guidance in the areas associated with the topic as they can change rapidly.
One common element in many value-based programs is risk adjustment using Hierarchical Condition Categories (HCCs) to create a Risk Adjustment Factor (RAF) score. This method ranks diagnoses into categories that represent conditions with similar cost patterns.
Why are so many AKI records being denied? It’s hard to give one answer for why so many AKI records are being denied lately, but most appear to be due to the multiple sets of criteria available for use in determining if a patient has AKI, as well as physician documentation. As stated in Part 3 of this series, there are three main criteria/classifications used to diagnose AKI.
In previous parts of this series we looked at the definitions of AKI/ARF, causes, coding and sequencing, and the common clinical indicators that patients present with that are diagnosed with this condition. In Part 4, we will look at the documentation that should be present to report the diagnosis without fear of denial, as well as when a query is needed to clarify the diagnosis.
If the facility does a COVID-19 test, and test is negative, do I need a diagnosis code. The answer is yes, you will report a Z-code. The Z-code depends on the record documentation and circumstances of testing. For any patient receiving a COVID-19 test, if negative, there MUST e a Z-code to describe why the test was taken. (Test negative for COVID-19 and MD does not override negative results).
In the first parts of this series we looked at definitions of AKI/ARF, causes, coding and sequencing. In Part 3, we will look at what clinical indicators would possibly be present to support the diagnosis of AKI/ARF.
The FY2021 IPPS Proposed Rule is out and here are some highlights from it regarding ICD-10 Code proposals. We will know if these changes are permanent after the public comment period is over on July 10, 2020 and CMS prepares the Final Rule, usually out by August 1.
As discussed in Part 1 of this series, AKI/ARF is a common diagnosis that coders see daily. In Part 2, we are going to focus on the different types/specificity of AKI/ARF. We’ll learn what they mean, as well as how to code the diagnosis.
This is part 1 in a series focused on coding of acute kidney injury (AKI) and/or acute renal failure (ARF). AKI/ARF is reported often, but is also one of the most common diagnosis found in denials.
With the proliferation of COVID-19 cases, we thought we would put together a quick reference listing of some of the common scenarios that coders have asked about. As with all coding, coders should follow Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting and the COVD-19 Frequently Asked Questions document by the AHA.
Effective March 1, Medicare will pay physicians for telehealth services at the same rate as in-person visits for all diagnoses, not just services related to COVID-19. This great for providers whose patients are reluctant to visit the office.
The biggest reasons why some hospital systems are moving to single path coding is to eliminate duplicative processes and to optimize productivity. In addition, costs are reduced when only one coder “touches” the record and completes both types of coding.
Effective with 4/1/2020 discharges, ICD-10-CM code U07.0 is used to report vaping -related disorders. ICD-10-CM code U07.0 (vaping related disorder) should be used when documentation supports that the patient has a lung-related disorder from vaping. This code is found in the new ICD-10-CM Chapter 22. U07.0 will be in listed in the ICD-10-CM manual under a new section: Provisional assignment of new disease of uncertain etiology or emergency use.
The US government and public-health officials are urging consumers to utilize telemedicine for remote treatment, fill prescriptions and get medical attention during the new coronavirus pandemic. The goal is to keep people with symptoms at home and to practice social distancing if their condition doesn’t warrant more intensive hospital care.
Coronavirus: Tips for working from home. Companies around the world have told their employees to stay home and work remotely. Whether you’re a new to this concept or a work from home veteran, here’s some tips to staying productive from our #HIAfamily.
This is the final part of a three part series in which we address how coders can better interact with Clinical Documentation Improvement (CDI) professionals. In this part, we provide an actual example of an effective communication response to CDI.
This is part two of a three part series in which we address how coders can better interact with Clinical Documentation Improvement (CDI) professionals. In this part, we discuss mismatches and how to best go about resolving them. In part three we will provide a case example of best practice interaction.
This is part one of a three part series in which we address how coders can better interact with Clinical Documentation Integrity (CDI) professionals. Many times these departments are separate and the remote environment makes it difficult to interact efficiently between the two departments. In part one, we will discuss the history and objectives of CDI so the coder has a better understanding of CDI’s role.
One reason that coders should report chronic conditions (including history and status codes) on outpatient records is the HCC’s—Hierarchical Condition Categories. The quick and easy explanation of what HCC’s are is each HCC is mapped to certain ICD-10-CM codes or code ranges. HCC coding is designed to estimate future health care costs for patients.
For Part 5 of this 5-part series, we will look at Chapter 4 within ICD-10-CM—E00-E89—Endocrine, Nutritional, and Metabolic Diseases. There is no possible way to include every guideline or coding reference for this chapter, but here are some of the most common issues.
For Part 4 of this 5-part series, we will look at Chapter 10 within ICD-10-CM—J00-J99—Diseases of the Respiratory System. There is no possible way to include every guideline or coding reference for this chapter, but here are some of the most common issues.
For Part 3 of this 5 part series, we will look at Chapter 9 within ICD-10-CM—I00-I99—Diseases of the Circulatory System. This chapter contains so many of the everyday diagnoses that we code such as hypertension, heart disease and stroke.
For Part 2 of this 5-part series, we will look at Chapter 1 within ICD-10-CM—A00-B99—Certain Infectious and Parasitic Diseases. There is no possible way to include every guideline or coding reference for this chapter, but here are some of the most common issues.
For Part 1 of this 5-part series, we will look at Chapter 21 within ICD-10-CM—Z00-Z99—Factors influencing health status and contact with health services. There is no possible way to include every guideline or coding reference for this chapter, but I’ll do my best to touch on some off the most common issues.
In response to the recent occurrences of vaping related disorders and in consultation with the World Health Organization (WHO) Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, the WHO Family of International Classifications (WHOFIC) Network Classification and Statistics Advisory Committee (CSAC) was convened to discuss a diagnosis code for vaping related illness for immediate use.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is in process of developing a new code for the COVID-19 (coronavirus) that will be released October 1, 2020. In the meantime, the CDC has provided advice on coding the COVID-19 coronavirus.
We’re finally at the #1 most common DRG with recommendations by HIA for 2019. Just to recap, HIA reviewed over 50,000 inpatient records in 2019. Most have probably already guessed what the correct DRG would be with the most recommendations. There are just some diagnoses and DRG’s that will always be a thorn in the side for coders. #1 DRG with the most recommendations during HIA reviews : DRG 871—Septicemia or severe sepsis w/o mechanical ventilation >96 hours with MCC
We’re now at the second most common DRG with recommendations by HIA for 2019. Just to recap, HIA reviewed over 50,000 inpatient records in 2019. We are counting down to # 1. #2 DRG with the most recommendations during HIA reviews: DRG 872—Septicemia or severe sepsis w/o mechanical ventilation >96 hours w/o MCC.
In 2019, HIA reviewed over 50,000 inpatient records. Wow! That is a lot of records. Even with this large number of records, the DRG’s with recommendations are still the ones that coders typically see during audits. #3 DRG 190—Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with MCC.
In 2019, HIA reviewed over 50,000 inpatient records. Wow! That is a lot of records. Even with this large number of records, the DRG’s with recommendations are still the ones that coders typically see during audits. #4 is DRG 193—Simple pneumonia & pleurisy with MCC.