Part 3: Sepsis Series | Severe Sepsis Documentation and Reporting
Kim Carrier RHIT, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P
Director of Coding Quality Assurance
AHIMA Approved ICD-10-CM/PCS Trainer
In Part 2, we focused on sepsis sequencing. In Part 3, we are going to focus on documentation needed to report the diagnosis of severe sepsis.
What is Severe Sepsis?
Severe sepsis occurs when sepsis progresses and signs of organ dysfunction/failure develop. One site stated that approximately 30% of patients with severe sepsis do not survive. Patients may develop one organ dysfunction/failure, multi-system organ failure and/or septic shock. Septic shock is severe cardiovascular dysfunction with extremely low blood pressure and hypoperfusion that does not respond to intravenous fluids. If severe sepsis is not documented correctly in the medical record, it is very difficult for coders to know how to report. A physician query may be necessary to clarify that the organ dysfunction in the record is related to the sepsis, if not documented clearly.
Cryptic septic shock is another type of shock being documented. These patients have severe lactic acidosis (4.0 mM/L or greater) and clinical signs of shock. The blood pressure may be normal in patients with cryptic septic shock. ALL patients should have a serum lactate measured that present with signs of sepsis. This elevated value may alert the physician of cryptic shock.
What Documentation is Needed to Report Severe Sepsis?
For coders, if the physician has documented severe sepsis, linked an acute organ dysfunction/failure to sepsis or the ICD-10-CM Index to Diseases directs the coder to the code for severe sepsis, it may be coded.
There are two codes for severe sepsis in ICD-10-CM that are reported in addition to the code for sepsis and any organ dysfunction/failure codes
- R65.20—Severe sepsis without septic shock
- R65.21—Severe sepsis with septic shock
Neither of these two codes are acceptable as the PDX. The ICD-10-CM Index does have instructional notes to code first the underlying infection. There are also instructional notes to use additional code to identify specific organ dysfunction. There are several organ dysfunctions listed it the ICD-10-CM Index, but this list is not an exhaustive list. A query may be necessary to clarify if the documentation is describing organ dysfunction or if the organ dysfunction is related to the diagnosis of sepsis.
- Patient presents with altered mental status from the nursing home. She is noted in the ED to have fever, tachycardia, hypotension, elevated lactic acid, and O2 sat of 76% or room air. The patient was intubated and placed on mechanical ventilation. Labs were drawn and patient had chest x-ray that showed pneumonia in both lungs. She was admitted with the diagnosis of pneumonia with acute respiratory failure and sepsis. She was worked up and found to also have an indwelling Foley catheter that appeared to have been in place for a long time. This was removed and cultured. The labs came back to show that the patient had E. coli on the catheter tip as well as E. coli in the urine specimen that had been sent to the lab. IV antibiotics were adjusted to cover the urinary tract infection. The patient required vasopressors for hypotension that didn’t respond to intravenous fluids. Despite the IV antibiotics, fluids and IV vasopressors the patient expired. The final diagnoses were: 1. Bilateral pneumonia, most likely due to aspiration pneumonia; 2. E. coli urinary tract infection due to indwelling Foley; 3. Acute respiratory failure due to pneumonia; 4. E coli sepsis due to both aspiration pneumonia and urinary tract infection with septic shock. In this case, the PDX would be reported as A41.51 (Sepsis due to E. coli). SDX codes T83.511A (Infection and inflammatory reaction due to indwelling urethral catheter, initial encounter), J69.0 (Pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit), R65.21 (Severe sepsis with septic shock), J96.00 (Acute respiratory failure, unspecified whether with hypoxia or hypercapnia) and N39.0 (Urinary tract infection, site not specified). There were actually two possible selections for PDX. Sepsis is documented to be due to both aspiration pneumonia and UTI secondary to indwelling Foley catheter. Treatment seems to be equal with IV antibiotics, fluids and vasopressors. In this case, we went with A41.51 (Sepsis due to E. coli) as the PDX since it was one of the possible choices and it is the most resource intense DRG. Rarely will there be more than one diagnosis that meets the definition of PDX, but when there is, without further sequencing direction, either may be sequenced first.
- Patient presents from nursing home where he was found unresponsive with high fever and tachycardia of 122. After admission, the lab work did show that the patient had WBC of 26,000 and chest x-ray showed pneumonia. At the nursing home, the patient is known to be very alert on most days. IV antibiotics were started and the patient rapidly began to improve and by day 4 the altered mental status had cleared, lungs sounded much better and WBC had improved to 10,000. During the workup, the patient was found to have encephalopathy due to sepsis. Patient’s mental status was at baseline on day 5 and the patient was discharged back to the nursing home. Final diagnoses for this patient were 1. Sepsis on admission, due to pneumonia; 2. Pneumonia; 3. Encephalopathy due to sepsis and pneumonia; and 4. Fever and WBC due to sepsis. In this case, A41.9 (Sepsis, unspecified organism) would be reported as the PDX. J18.9 (Pneumonia, unspecified organism), G93.41 (Metabolic encephalopathy) and R65.20 (Severe sepsis without septic shock) would be reported as additional SDX codes. No codes were assigned for the symptoms of fever and elevated WBC since these were documented as due to sepsis. Since these are common symptoms/clinical indicators in patients with sepsis, no additional code is needed. Severe sepsis was also coded (R65.20) since the patient did have documented septic encephalopathy. Encephalopathy is listed as one of the organ dysfunctions in the instructional notes within ICD-10-CM at R65.-.
- Severe sepsis is associated with at least one acute organ dysfunction/failure
- There are two codes for severe sepsis which indicate whether septic shock is present or not
- Approximately 30% of people diagnosed with severe sepsis will expire
- Organ dysfunction/failure must be specifically linked to the diagnosis of sepsis
- If the physician documents “severe sepsis” it is to be coded
- If the ICD-10-CM leads to coder to severe sepsis it should be coded
- The list of organ failures/dysfunctions listed in the ICD-10-CM index at R65.21 is not an exhaustive list
- The “with” guideline in the OCG (Section 1.A.15) does not apply to sepsis and organ dysfunction (the link must be made by the physician)
- When multiple conditions are responsible for the diagnosis of sepsis and the Alphabetic Index, Tabular List or other Chapter specific guideline are not present, either of the conditions may be sequenced first.
Be on the lookout for Part 4 of this series on sepsis. In Part 4 we will discuss clinical indicators needed to report the diagnosis of sepsis as well as when to query the physician for support of the diagnosis.
ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting FY 2020
Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, Third Quarter 2019: Page 17
Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, Fourth Quarter 2017: Page 98-100
Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, Third Quarter 2016: Page 14
Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, Second Quarter 2017: Page 8-9
The information contained in this coding advice is valid at the time of posting. Viewers are encouraged to research subsequent official guidance in the areas associated with the topic as they can change rapidly.
In the previous three parts of this four-part series, we discussed the new ICD-10-CM diagnosis code changes, ICD-10-PCS procedure code changes and FY2021 IPPS changes. In this last Part 4 of the series, we will review the NTAP procedure codes and reimbursement add-on payments for FY2021.
In the previous two parts of this four part series, we discussed the new ICD-10-CM diagnosis code changes and ICD-10-PC procedure code changes. In this session we will review the major IPPS changes for FY2021.
This is Part 2 of a 4 part series on the FY2021 ICD-10 Code and IPPS changes. In this part, the ICD-10-PCS procedure codes are presented. For FY2021 ICD-10-PCS there are 78,115 total codes (FY2020 total was 77,571); 556 new codes (734 new last year in FY2020)…
This is Part 1 of a 4 part series on the FY2021 changes to ICD-10 and the IPPS. In this part, we discuss some of the new ICD-10-CM diagnosis changes. Here is the breakdown: 72,616 total ICD-10-CM codes for FY2021; 490 new codes (2020 had 273 new codes); 58 deleted codes (2020 had 21 deleted codes); 47 revised codes (2020 had 30 revised codes)
Acute pulmonary edema is the rapid accumulation of fluid within the tissue and space around the air sacs of the lung (lung interstitium). When this fluid collects in the air sacs in the lungs it is difficult to breathe. Acute pulmonary edema occurs suddenly and is life threatening.
“Client S” is a small, not-for-profit, 40 bed micro-hospital in the Southeast. HIA performed a 65-record review this year for Client S and found an opportunity with 15 of them. 9 had an increased reimbursement with a total of $43,228 found.
The coma scale codes (R40.2-) can be used in conjunction with traumatic brain injury codes, acute cerebrovascular disease or sequelae of cerebrovascular disease codes. These codes are primarily for use by trauma registries, but they may be used in any setting where this information is collected. The coma scale may also be used to assess the status of the central nervous system for other non-trauma conditions, such as monitoring patients in the intensive care unit regardless of medical condition.
In the past, there had been an Excludes1 note at I46.- Cardiac arrest that excluded R57.0, Cardiac shock. HIA had also received a letter from AHA on a case in the past that had stated that only I46.- Cardiac arrest would be coded if both were documented. In addition, the Third Quarter Coding Clinic page 26 had a similar case that asked if both could be coded, and AHA had instructed that only I46.9, cardiac arrest, cause unspecified would be coded if both were documented and that the CDC would be looking at possible revision to the Excludes1 note.
A higher CMI corresponds to increased consumption of resources and increased cost of patient care, resulting in increased reimbursement to the facility from government and private payers, like CMS. We know that documentation directly impacts coding.
Lately we have seen several cases where the endarterectomy was assigned along with the coronary artery bypass (CABG) procedure when being performed on the same vessel to facilitate the CABG. A coronary artery endarterectomy is not always performed during a CABG procedure, so when it is performed it becomes confusing as to whether to code it separately or not.
Assign code Z20.828, “Contact with and (suspected) exposure to other viral communicable diseases” for all patients who are tested for COVID-19 and the results are negative, regardless of symptoms, no symptoms, exposure or not as we are in a pandemic.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced new procedure codes for treatments of COVID-19 – effective as of August 1, 2020. Among the new codes are Section X New Technology codes for the introduction or infusion of therapeutics including Remdesivir, Sarilumab, Tocilizumab, transfusion of convalescent plasma, as well as introduction of any other or new therapeutic substances for the treatment of COVID-19.
One common element in many value-based programs is risk adjustment using Hierarchical Condition Categories (HCCs) to create a Risk Adjustment Factor (RAF) score. This method ranks diagnoses into categories that represent conditions with similar cost patterns.
Why are so many AKI records being denied? It’s hard to give one answer for why so many AKI records are being denied lately, but most appear to be due to the multiple sets of criteria available for use in determining if a patient has AKI, as well as physician documentation. As stated in Part 3 of this series, there are three main criteria/classifications used to diagnose AKI.
In previous parts of this series we looked at the definitions of AKI/ARF, causes, coding and sequencing, and the common clinical indicators that patients present with that are diagnosed with this condition. In Part 4, we will look at the documentation that should be present to report the diagnosis without fear of denial, as well as when a query is needed to clarify the diagnosis.
If the facility does a COVID-19 test, and test is negative, do I need a diagnosis code. The answer is yes, you will report a Z-code. The Z-code depends on the record documentation and circumstances of testing. For any patient receiving a COVID-19 test, if negative, there MUST e a Z-code to describe why the test was taken. (Test negative for COVID-19 and MD does not override negative results).
In the first parts of this series we looked at definitions of AKI/ARF, causes, coding and sequencing. In Part 3, we will look at what clinical indicators would possibly be present to support the diagnosis of AKI/ARF.
The FY2021 IPPS Proposed Rule is out and here are some highlights from it regarding ICD-10 Code proposals. We will know if these changes are permanent after the public comment period is over on July 10, 2020 and CMS prepares the Final Rule, usually out by August 1.
As discussed in Part 1 of this series, AKI/ARF is a common diagnosis that coders see daily. In Part 2, we are going to focus on the different types/specificity of AKI/ARF. We’ll learn what they mean, as well as how to code the diagnosis.
This is part 1 in a series focused on coding of acute kidney injury (AKI) and/or acute renal failure (ARF). AKI/ARF is reported often, but is also one of the most common diagnosis found in denials.
With the proliferation of COVID-19 cases, we thought we would put together a quick reference listing of some of the common scenarios that coders have asked about. As with all coding, coders should follow Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting and the COVD-19 Frequently Asked Questions document by the AHA.
Effective March 1, Medicare will pay physicians for telehealth services at the same rate as in-person visits for all diagnoses, not just services related to COVID-19. This great for providers whose patients are reluctant to visit the office.
The biggest reasons why some hospital systems are moving to single path coding is to eliminate duplicative processes and to optimize productivity. In addition, costs are reduced when only one coder “touches” the record and completes both types of coding.
The US government and public-health officials are urging consumers to utilize telemedicine for remote treatment, fill prescriptions and get medical attention during the new coronavirus pandemic. The goal is to keep people with symptoms at home and to practice social distancing if their condition doesn’t warrant more intensive hospital care.
Coronavirus: Tips for working from home. Companies around the world have told their employees to stay home and work remotely. Whether you’re a new to this concept or a work from home veteran, here’s some tips to staying productive from our #HIAfamily.
This is the final part of a three part series in which we address how coders can better interact with Clinical Documentation Improvement (CDI) professionals. In this part, we provide an actual example of an effective communication response to CDI.
This is part two of a three part series in which we address how coders can better interact with Clinical Documentation Improvement (CDI) professionals. In this part, we discuss mismatches and how to best go about resolving them. In part three we will provide a case example of best practice interaction.
This is part one of a three part series in which we address how coders can better interact with Clinical Documentation Integrity (CDI) professionals. Many times these departments are separate and the remote environment makes it difficult to interact efficiently between the two departments. In part one, we will discuss the history and objectives of CDI so the coder has a better understanding of CDI’s role.
One reason that coders should report chronic conditions (including history and status codes) on outpatient records is the HCC’s—Hierarchical Condition Categories. The quick and easy explanation of what HCC’s are is each HCC is mapped to certain ICD-10-CM codes or code ranges. HCC coding is designed to estimate future health care costs for patients.