Part 2: Sepsis Series | Sequencing the Diagnosis of Sepsis
Kim Carrier RHIT, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P
Director of Coding Quality Assurance
AHIMA Approved ICD-10-CM/PCS Trainer
As discussed in Part 1 of this series, sepsis is a common diagnosis for coders, however is oftentimes difficult to know how to sequence the diagnosis in ICD-10-CM. In Part 2, we are going to focus on sequencing of sepsis when the diagnosis is clearly documented. Later in the series we will look at what to do when the diagnosis is not clearly documented.
Sepsis can be caused by many different infections, and some of those are in other chapters within ICD-10-CM and have special sequencing instructions. Without the diagnosis of sepsis falling into one of those chapters, coders should follow the ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting of sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock.
Sepsis Due to Localized Infection
When sepsis is present on admission and due to a localized infection (not a device or post procedural), the sepsis code is sequenced first followed by the code for the localized infection.
- Patient presents with fever, chills, elevated WBC, shortness of breath, cough and mental status changes. Upon admission the patient is documented with possible sepsis and chest x-ray confirmed pneumonia. Patient was treated with IV antibiotics with improvement and was able to be discharged on day four of admission. The final diagnosis is sepsis due to pneumonia. In this case, since the sepsis was present on admission and due to the underlying infection of pneumonia, the coder would sequence sepsis (A41.9-Sepsis unspecified organism) as the PDX and pneumonia (J18.9-Pneumonia, unspecified organism) as a SDX code. If the sepsis and/or pneumonia were further specified, coders would report the more specific codes.
- Patient presents with fever, chills, elevated WBC, shortness of breath, cough and mental status changes. Upon admission the patient is documented with confirmed pneumonia. Patient was treated with IV antibiotics without improvement and the patient developed sepsis. Antibiotics were changed and the patient improved and was able to be discharged on day four of admission. The final diagnosis is pneumonia with sepsis. In this case, since the sepsis was not present on admission the localized infection of pneumonia (J18.9-Pneumonia, unspecified organism) is sequenced as the PDX followed by the diagnosis of sepsis (A41.9-Sepsis unspecified organism) as a SDX code. If it is not clear that the sepsis was or was not present on admission, a query should be sent for clarification.
- Patient is admitted with multiple symptoms that were suggestive of sepsis. After workup and treatment, the patient was discharged with a diagnosis of sepsis due to E. coli urinary tract infection (UTI). In this case, since the sepsis was present on admission and due to E. coli UTI, then A41.5-(Sepsis due to Escherichia coli) is the PDX followed by the diagnosis of UTI (N39.0-Urinary tract infection, site not specified) as a SDX code. Note, in this case no additional code was added for the E. coli bacteria causing the UTI, even though there is an instructional note, since the bacteria is clearly reported in code A41.51. Since the bacteria is responsible for both conditions, reporting the additional code for the bacteria would be redundant.
Sepsis Due to Post Procedural Infection
When sepsis is due to intraoperative or post procedural complications, a code from Chapter 19 within ICD-10-CM is sequenced first, followed by a code for the specific complication if applicable. The exceptions to this are when the infection/sepsis is obstetrical and a code from Chapter 15 within ICD-10-CM would be reported first.
- Patient presented with fever, chills, elevated WBC, and tachycardia with obvious left leg cellulitis due to previous removal of saphenous vein for CABG. This had been an issue for several days and was extremely red and swollen. The patient was admitted to r/o sepsis and to begin IV antibiotics. Culture of the draining left leg and blood cultures were sent to the laboratory for testing. This did show MRSA. The documentation does support that sepsis was ruled in. After six days of IV antibiotics the patient is ready for discharge. Discharge diagnosis is MRSA left leg superficial skin cellulitis due to previous surgery developing MRSA sepsis. In this case, you would report T81.41XA (Infection following a procedure, superficial incisional surgical site, initial encounter) as the PDX followed by T81.44XA (Sepsis following a procedure, initial encounter), A41.02 (Sepsis due to MRSA) and L03.116 (Cellulitis of lower limb) as additional SDX. Per the OCG FY 2020, T81.41XA is first and then additional codes for the sepsis.
- Patient presents with fever, chills, tachycardia and shortness of breath. She is noted to be 34 weeks pregnant. She is examined by OB in the ED and the baby appears to be fine but she does appear to have pneumonia of the right lung. Patient is admitted for IV antibiotics and monitoring of her pregnancy. After three days of IV antibiotics, she is well enough to discharge home and continue oral antibiotics for five more days. The final discharge diagnoses are: 1. Pneumonia in 34 weeks pregnant female; 2. Sepsis on admission due to pneumonia. In this case, O98.813 (Other maternal infectious and parasitic disease complicating pregnancy, third trimester) would be reported as the PDX. O99.513 (Disease of the respiratory system complicating pregnancy, third trimester), A41.9 (Sepsis, unspecified organism), J18.9 (Pneumonia, unspecified organism) and Z3A.34 (34 weeks gestation of pregnancy) would be reported as SDX codes. There are instructional notes within ICD-10-CM Index and OCG that state a code from Chapter 15: Pregnancy, Childbirth, and the Puerperium to sequence first, and codes from other chapters may be used in addition to specify the condition.
Sepsis Due to Device, Implant and Graft
Patients with devices, implants or grafts often develop sepsis due to the presence of the device. The link MUST be made by the physician. If this link is not made, or there is conflicting documentation, a query is necessary to clarify the cause and effect relationship. When looking in the ICD-10-CM alphabetic index, there are entries under Sepsis—due to for arterial graft to ventricular shunt. The most common graft/device/implant infections are found in hemodialysis, vascular, and urinary patients. This typically occurs due to skin organisms, but this is not always the cause. The coder must read the documentation carefully to help in determining the type of device, implant or graft that is infected.
- Patient presented from nursing home with fever, elevated WBC, tachycardia and altered mental status and was admitted with the diagnosis of sepsis. During the workup it was documented that the patient had an indwelling Foley catheter for reasons unknown to the physician. The catheter was removed and sent for culture as well as urine and blood cultures obtained prior to starting the patient on IV antibiotics. At the time of discharge, the patient is documented to have E. coli sepsis due to UTI, and E. coli UTI secondary to indwelling Foley. In this case, T83.511A (Infection and Inflammatory reaction due to indwelling urethral catheter, initial encounter) is reported as the PDX. A41.51 (Sepsis due to Escherichia coli), and N39.0 (Urinary tract infection, site not specified) would be reported as additional diagnoses. There are instructional notes under T83.51- to use additional code to identify infection. In the OCG, coders are instructed to report the complication code first, followed by the code for sepsis.
- Dialysis patient presents after staff noticed a fever, chills and altered mental status during their scheduled outpatient dialysis session. Work up did reveal extremely high WBC on labs after admission and the diagnosis of sepsis was made. Infectious disease saw the patient and recommended removal of the arteriovenous (AV) graft that the patient had been using for dialysis. The patient will remain on IV antibiotics for 6 weeks and then removal will be scheduled. The discharge diagnosis given is sepsis due to AV graft infection. In this case, the PDX will be T82.7XXA (Infection and Inflammatory reaction due to other cardiac and vascular devices, implants and grafts, initial encounter). An additional code of A41.9 (Sepsis, unspecified organism) would be reported since the infection did progress to sepsis. There are instructional notes under T82.7- to use additional code to identify infection.
- Patient presents to the ED with fever and not feeling well. Workup in the ED showed that the patient had tachycardia of 112, high fever, and not making sense when speaking. Patient was admitted with suspected sepsis due to central venous catheter that was being used for hemodialysis and also to r/o stroke. Workup did rule out the diagnosis of stroke but the patient was found to have positive blood cultures for Streptococcal pneumoniae. The plan was long term antibiotics and change of hemodialysis catheter. The patient was discharged with the diagnosis of sepsis due to infected hemodialysis central venous catheter. In this case, T80.211A (Bloodstream infection due to central venous catheter, initial episode) would be reported as the PDX, followed by A40.3 (Sepsis due to Streptococcus pneumoniae) as a SDX. There are instructional notes under T80.2- to use additional code to identify the infection.
There are so many different reasons that may cause a patient to have sepsis, and there is no way to list all of those in this coding tidbit. Use of the OCG and Coding Clinic advice are necessary when coding sepsis and complications that may be the reason the patient develops sepsis.
In Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, Third Quarter 2019, coders are instructed to use the general PDX selection guidelines when there are multiple causes documented that are causing sepsis. If the conditions that are responsible for the diagnosis of sepsis are equally treated, and meet the definition of PDX, and there are no other sequencing direction, any of the diagnoses may sequenced first.
Be on the lookout for Part 3 of this series, as we will discuss and learn about needed documentation and coding for severe sepsis.
ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting FY 2020
Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, Third Quarter 2019: Page 17
Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, First Quarter 2019: Page 13-14
Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, Fourth Quarter 2018: Pages 22-23, 89-90
Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, First Quarter 2018: Page 16
Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, First Quarter 2015: Pages 19-20
The information contained in this coding advice is valid at the time of posting. Viewers are encouraged to research subsequent official guidance in the areas associated with the topic as they can change rapidly.
In the previous three parts of this four-part series, we discussed the new ICD-10-CM diagnosis code changes, ICD-10-PCS procedure code changes and FY2021 IPPS changes. In this last Part 4 of the series, we will review the NTAP procedure codes and reimbursement add-on payments for FY2021.
In the previous two parts of this four part series, we discussed the new ICD-10-CM diagnosis code changes and ICD-10-PC procedure code changes. In this session we will review the major IPPS changes for FY2021.
This is Part 2 of a 4 part series on the FY2021 ICD-10 Code and IPPS changes. In this part, the ICD-10-PCS procedure codes are presented. For FY2021 ICD-10-PCS there are 78,115 total codes (FY2020 total was 77,571); 556 new codes (734 new last year in FY2020)…
This is Part 1 of a 4 part series on the FY2021 changes to ICD-10 and the IPPS. In this part, we discuss some of the new ICD-10-CM diagnosis changes. Here is the breakdown: 72,616 total ICD-10-CM codes for FY2021; 490 new codes (2020 had 273 new codes); 58 deleted codes (2020 had 21 deleted codes); 47 revised codes (2020 had 30 revised codes)
Acute pulmonary edema is the rapid accumulation of fluid within the tissue and space around the air sacs of the lung (lung interstitium). When this fluid collects in the air sacs in the lungs it is difficult to breathe. Acute pulmonary edema occurs suddenly and is life threatening.
“Client S” is a small, not-for-profit, 40 bed micro-hospital in the Southeast. HIA performed a 65-record review this year for Client S and found an opportunity with 15 of them. 9 had an increased reimbursement with a total of $43,228 found.
The coma scale codes (R40.2-) can be used in conjunction with traumatic brain injury codes, acute cerebrovascular disease or sequelae of cerebrovascular disease codes. These codes are primarily for use by trauma registries, but they may be used in any setting where this information is collected. The coma scale may also be used to assess the status of the central nervous system for other non-trauma conditions, such as monitoring patients in the intensive care unit regardless of medical condition.
In the past, there had been an Excludes1 note at I46.- Cardiac arrest that excluded R57.0, Cardiac shock. HIA had also received a letter from AHA on a case in the past that had stated that only I46.- Cardiac arrest would be coded if both were documented. In addition, the Third Quarter Coding Clinic page 26 had a similar case that asked if both could be coded, and AHA had instructed that only I46.9, cardiac arrest, cause unspecified would be coded if both were documented and that the CDC would be looking at possible revision to the Excludes1 note.
A higher CMI corresponds to increased consumption of resources and increased cost of patient care, resulting in increased reimbursement to the facility from government and private payers, like CMS. We know that documentation directly impacts coding.
Lately we have seen several cases where the endarterectomy was assigned along with the coronary artery bypass (CABG) procedure when being performed on the same vessel to facilitate the CABG. A coronary artery endarterectomy is not always performed during a CABG procedure, so when it is performed it becomes confusing as to whether to code it separately or not.
Assign code Z20.828, “Contact with and (suspected) exposure to other viral communicable diseases” for all patients who are tested for COVID-19 and the results are negative, regardless of symptoms, no symptoms, exposure or not as we are in a pandemic.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced new procedure codes for treatments of COVID-19 – effective as of August 1, 2020. Among the new codes are Section X New Technology codes for the introduction or infusion of therapeutics including Remdesivir, Sarilumab, Tocilizumab, transfusion of convalescent plasma, as well as introduction of any other or new therapeutic substances for the treatment of COVID-19.
One common element in many value-based programs is risk adjustment using Hierarchical Condition Categories (HCCs) to create a Risk Adjustment Factor (RAF) score. This method ranks diagnoses into categories that represent conditions with similar cost patterns.
Why are so many AKI records being denied? It’s hard to give one answer for why so many AKI records are being denied lately, but most appear to be due to the multiple sets of criteria available for use in determining if a patient has AKI, as well as physician documentation. As stated in Part 3 of this series, there are three main criteria/classifications used to diagnose AKI.
In previous parts of this series we looked at the definitions of AKI/ARF, causes, coding and sequencing, and the common clinical indicators that patients present with that are diagnosed with this condition. In Part 4, we will look at the documentation that should be present to report the diagnosis without fear of denial, as well as when a query is needed to clarify the diagnosis.
If the facility does a COVID-19 test, and test is negative, do I need a diagnosis code. The answer is yes, you will report a Z-code. The Z-code depends on the record documentation and circumstances of testing. For any patient receiving a COVID-19 test, if negative, there MUST e a Z-code to describe why the test was taken. (Test negative for COVID-19 and MD does not override negative results).
In the first parts of this series we looked at definitions of AKI/ARF, causes, coding and sequencing. In Part 3, we will look at what clinical indicators would possibly be present to support the diagnosis of AKI/ARF.
The FY2021 IPPS Proposed Rule is out and here are some highlights from it regarding ICD-10 Code proposals. We will know if these changes are permanent after the public comment period is over on July 10, 2020 and CMS prepares the Final Rule, usually out by August 1.
As discussed in Part 1 of this series, AKI/ARF is a common diagnosis that coders see daily. In Part 2, we are going to focus on the different types/specificity of AKI/ARF. We’ll learn what they mean, as well as how to code the diagnosis.
This is part 1 in a series focused on coding of acute kidney injury (AKI) and/or acute renal failure (ARF). AKI/ARF is reported often, but is also one of the most common diagnosis found in denials.
With the proliferation of COVID-19 cases, we thought we would put together a quick reference listing of some of the common scenarios that coders have asked about. As with all coding, coders should follow Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting and the COVD-19 Frequently Asked Questions document by the AHA.
Effective March 1, Medicare will pay physicians for telehealth services at the same rate as in-person visits for all diagnoses, not just services related to COVID-19. This great for providers whose patients are reluctant to visit the office.
The biggest reasons why some hospital systems are moving to single path coding is to eliminate duplicative processes and to optimize productivity. In addition, costs are reduced when only one coder “touches” the record and completes both types of coding.
The US government and public-health officials are urging consumers to utilize telemedicine for remote treatment, fill prescriptions and get medical attention during the new coronavirus pandemic. The goal is to keep people with symptoms at home and to practice social distancing if their condition doesn’t warrant more intensive hospital care.
Coronavirus: Tips for working from home. Companies around the world have told their employees to stay home and work remotely. Whether you’re a new to this concept or a work from home veteran, here’s some tips to staying productive from our #HIAfamily.
This is the final part of a three part series in which we address how coders can better interact with Clinical Documentation Improvement (CDI) professionals. In this part, we provide an actual example of an effective communication response to CDI.
This is part two of a three part series in which we address how coders can better interact with Clinical Documentation Improvement (CDI) professionals. In this part, we discuss mismatches and how to best go about resolving them. In part three we will provide a case example of best practice interaction.
This is part one of a three part series in which we address how coders can better interact with Clinical Documentation Integrity (CDI) professionals. Many times these departments are separate and the remote environment makes it difficult to interact efficiently between the two departments. In part one, we will discuss the history and objectives of CDI so the coder has a better understanding of CDI’s role.
One reason that coders should report chronic conditions (including history and status codes) on outpatient records is the HCC’s—Hierarchical Condition Categories. The quick and easy explanation of what HCC’s are is each HCC is mapped to certain ICD-10-CM codes or code ranges. HCC coding is designed to estimate future health care costs for patients.