Query Question is Key

Jun 22, 2018

The key to a quality physician query is the question. The question provides direction for the choice of clinical indicators and options for response.  So why do so many coders have trouble writing the question? My theory is that coders overthink the question rather than keeping it simple and to the point.

The best way to get a physician to answer a query is with a question that makes sense and eliminates guessing as to what is being asked.

Some helpful hints:

Ask the question “What do I need to know?” and write down the response.  Usually this will need very little editing in order to be used as the query question.

  • Discharge summary states that the patient was treated for cystitis.  The patient is a nursing home patient with a long term Foley catheter.  What does the coder need to know?? – was the cystitis due to the Foley?  With just a little editing, the coder could ask:  “Can you clarify if the cystitis is related to the presence of the catheter?” 

Write the question in the form of a question, not a statement.

  • “Please specify if the cystitis is related to the presence of the catheter,” is considered directive and leading, plus it is not a question.

Be as clear, concise, and simple as possible.

  • “Can you clarify if the E. coli sepsis found on this admission was in any way related to the pedicle screws placed during the L3-S1 spinal fusion performed on the posterior column six months ago?”  This question will probably cause the physician’s eyes to “glaze over.”  A simpler and more concise question would be “Can you confirm any relationship between the sepsis and hardware from previous spinal fusion?”

Do not introduce a new diagnosis in the question.

  • Patient is admitted with several clinical indicators of sepsis, but the diagnosis is never given in the record documentation.  Final diagnosis on the discharge summary is bacteremia.  What does the coder need to know?? – is this sepsis?  Since sepsis was never documented in the record, the question cannot be “Did the patient have sepsis?” because that would be leading.  A better choice might be:  “Can the bacteremia be further clarified?”  Sepsis could then be listed as an option for response.  

Do not include the options for response in the question.

  • A question such as “Can you confirm if TIA was ruled in, ruled out, or unable to determine?” may seem confusing to the physicianIt is simpler and more concise written as:  “Can you confirm the diagnosis of TIA?”  The options for response would then be listed separately.

The information contained in this query advice is valid at the time of posting. Viewers are encouraged to research subsequent official guidance in the areas associated with the topic as they can change rapidly.

Leave a Comment

    Category

    Related blogs from Industry News

    ICD-10-PCS Root Operation Selection For Treatment ...

    Coding for treatment of cerebral aneurysms ma...

    Aromatase Inhibitor Use Reporting - Z79.811

    With the implementation of ICD-10-CM came mor...

    Coding and Reporting of Signs and Symptoms

    It is difficult for coders to know when to re...

    Apr 08, 2024

    Health Information Associates to Showcase Expertis...

    Health Information Associates (HIA), known fo...