Part 3: Top 5 ICD-10-CM Chapters 2019 | Acute Care Reviews
Kim Carrier RHIT, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P
Director of Coding Quality Assurance
AHIMA Approved ICD-10-CM/PCS Trainer
In 2019, HIA reviewed over 725,600 ICD-10-CM codes from many different facilities including review on our own coders. Yesterday we looked at the ICD-10-CM Chapter 1 and today we will focus on the third area with the most coding opportunities found during HIA reviews.
- Z00-Z99—Factors influencing health status and contact with health services
- A00-B99—Certain Infectious and Parasitic Diseases
- I00-I99—Disease of the Circulatory System
- J00-J99—Diseases of the Respiratory System
- E00-E89—Endocrine, Nutritional, and Metabolic Diseases
For Part 3 of this 5 part series, we will look at Chapter 9 within ICD-10-CM—I00-I99—Diseases of the Circulatory System. This chapter contains so many of the everyday diagnoses that we code such as hypertension, heart disease and stroke. Some of the most common recommendations made by HIA in 2019 for this Chapter was:
- Sequencing of the PDX
- Not reporting combination codes correctly
- Failing to follow the “with” guideline in ICD-10-CM
- Not following the timeframe for acute myocardial infarctions
- Reporting type 2 AMI as the PDX instead of the underlying cause
- Missed complications and major complications
- Missed ICD-10-PCS codes
- Coding cardiac catheterization without pressure measurements documented
- Clarifying the validity of documented diagnoses such as acute heart failure without aggressive treatment
In addition to the Official Coding Guidelines for ICD-10-CM for FY 2020, Pages 46-52 that address specific chapter 9 guidelines to follow for reporting diseases of the cardiovascular system, there are multiple AHA Coding Clinics that discuss some of these in detail. Here are a few of these:
- ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, Second Quarter 2019 Pages: 5, 22-23, 32-33
- ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, First Quarter 2017 Pages: 44-47
- ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, Second Quarter 2018 Pages: 9-10
- ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, Fourth Quarter 2016 Pages: 26-28, 84-86, 140
- ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, First Quarter 2013 Pages: 24-26
- ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, Fourth Quarter 2017 Pages: 12-16, 84-86
- ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, Fourth Quarter 2012 Pages: 90-98, 102-103
- ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, Second Quarter 2017 Pages: 11-12
- ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, Second Quarter 2015 Pages: 16-17
- ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, Third Quarter 2018 Pages: 5-6
- ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, Third Quarter 2016 Pages: 22-23
- ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, Fourth Quarter 2018 Pages: 88-89
- ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, Fourth Quarter 2019 Pages: 6-7
- ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, Second Quarter 2019 Pages: 3-6, 8
- ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, Fourth Quarter 2014 Pages: 21-22
- ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, First Quarter 2019 Pages: 16, 33-34
- ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, First Quarter 2016 Pages: 39-40
Coding Tips for Chapter 9: I00-I99—Disease of the Circulatory System
- Read and follow all instructional notes within ICD-10-CM Tabular
- ICD-10-CM presumes a causal relationship between hypertension and heart and/or kidney involvement unless the provider documents that the conditions are unrelated
- ICD-10-CM assumes rheumatic origin when valve disease affects multiple valves and the valvular heart disease is not described as non-rheumatic
- Follow the “with” in the Alphabetic Index
- ICD-10-CM presumes a causal relationship when a patient has both atherosclerosis and angina pectoris (unless other cause is identified)
- When a patient presents with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and coronary artery disease, the AMI is sequenced first
- The documentation of “intraoperative” or “postprocedural” may be only specifying a timeframe of when a condition occurred and a query may be needed to clarify if this is a true complication
- If a type 1 non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) evolves to Type 1 ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), assign the STEMI code
- If a type 1 STEMI converts to NSTEMI due to thrombolytic therapy, it is still coded as STEMI
- Timeframe for AMI’s in ICD-10-CM is 4 weeks (this was 8 weeks in ICD-9)
- Type 2 myocardial infarctions are coded with the underlying cause sequenced first
- Non-traumatic myocardial injury is coded to I51.89 (other ill-defined heart disease)
- The provider must link the diagnoses of heart failure and diastolic/systolic dysfunction
- The term “decompensated” indicates that there has been a flare up of a chronic condition
- Assign only one code if more than one type of atrial fibrillation is documented
- Verify the number of stents used when patient is undergoing percutaneous coronary artery stenting
Be on the lookout for Part 4 of this series. In that part, we will look at J00-J99—Diseases of the Respiratory System.
References listed above.
The information contained in this coding advice is valid at the time of posting. Viewers are encouraged to research subsequent official guidance in the areas associated with the topic as they can change rapidly.
Practices have not seen many revisions to the Evaluation and Management (E/M) office / outpatient visit guidelines in three decades – until now. As of January 1, there are new E/M coding guidelines. We’ll get to those in a bit, but first let’s look at why they changed.
Pseudoseizures are a form of non-epileptic seizure. These are difficult to diagnose and oftentimes extremely difficult for the patient to comprehend. The term “pseudoseizures” is an older term that is still used today to describe psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES).
With the implementation of ICD-10-CM came different codes and coding rules for many diagnoses. One of these is the coding of bowel obstruction when the patient presents for this condition that is caused by another condition.
This is Part 5 of a five part series on the new 2021 CPT codes. For the remaining areas we will just briefly summarize the section. Due to the intricate nature of these sections in CPT, it is recommended that the coder read the entire section notes associated with the new codes.
This is Part 4 of a five part series on the new 2021 CPT codes. In this series we will explore the CPT changes in the urinary, nervous, ocular and auditory systems. There are 2 new urinary/male reproductive system codes with no revisions or deletions; 3 new female reproductive codes with 2 deletions, 0 new with 4 deleted nervous system codes with 5 revisions; 5 new eye category III codes; and finally a 2 new auditory codes with one deletion.
This is Part 3 of a five part series on the new 2021 CPT codes. In this series we will explore the cardiovascular system CPT changes. There are 5 new cardiovascular CPT codes added with 0 deletions and 4 revisions.
This is Part 2 of a five part series on the new 2021 CPT codes. In this series we will explore the CPT changes for FY2021 and include some examples to help the coder understand the new codes. There are 0 new musculoskeletal CPT codes added with 0 deletions and 2 major revisions along with an extensive update to arthroscopic loose body removal requirements. For the respiratory system, there were 2 new codes, one code deletion and no revisions.
This is Part 1 of a five part series on the new 2021 CPT codes. In this series we will explore the CPT changes for FY2021 and include examples to help the coder understand the new codes. For 2021 in general, there were 199 new CPT codes added, 54 deleted and 69 revised.
In January, new CPT codes were released. There were 248 new CPT codes added, 71 deleted and 75 revised. Most of the surgery section changes were in the musculoskeletal and cardiovascular subsections. These included procedures such as skin grafting, breast biopsies, deep drug delivery systems, tricuspid valve repairs, aortic grafts and repair of iliac artery.
We have seen many updates and changes to COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) since the pandemic started. On January 1, 2021 we will see even more changes as outlined in this post. Also the CMS MS-DRG grouper will be updated to version 38.1 to accommodate the changes.
In the previous three parts of this four-part series, we discussed the new ICD-10-CM diagnosis code changes, ICD-10-PCS procedure code changes and FY2021 IPPS changes. In this last Part 4 of the series, we will review the NTAP procedure codes and reimbursement add-on payments for FY2021.
In the previous two parts of this four part series, we discussed the new ICD-10-CM diagnosis code changes and ICD-10-PC procedure code changes. In this session we will review the major IPPS changes for FY2021.
This is Part 2 of a 4 part series on the FY2021 ICD-10 Code and IPPS changes. In this part, the ICD-10-PCS procedure codes are presented. For FY2021 ICD-10-PCS there are 78,115 total codes (FY2020 total was 77,571); 556 new codes (734 new last year in FY2020)…
This is Part 1 of a 4 part series on the FY2021 changes to ICD-10 and the IPPS. In this part, we discuss some of the new ICD-10-CM diagnosis changes. Here is the breakdown: 72,616 total ICD-10-CM codes for FY2021; 490 new codes (2020 had 273 new codes); 58 deleted codes (2020 had 21 deleted codes); 47 revised codes (2020 had 30 revised codes)
Acute pulmonary edema is the rapid accumulation of fluid within the tissue and space around the air sacs of the lung (lung interstitium). When this fluid collects in the air sacs in the lungs it is difficult to breathe. Acute pulmonary edema occurs suddenly and is life threatening.
“Client S” is a small, not-for-profit, 40 bed micro-hospital in the Southeast. HIA performed a 65-record review this year for Client S and found an opportunity with 15 of them. 9 had an increased reimbursement with a total of $43,228 found.
The coma scale codes (R40.2-) can be used in conjunction with traumatic brain injury codes, acute cerebrovascular disease or sequelae of cerebrovascular disease codes. These codes are primarily for use by trauma registries, but they may be used in any setting where this information is collected. The coma scale may also be used to assess the status of the central nervous system for other non-trauma conditions, such as monitoring patients in the intensive care unit regardless of medical condition.
In the past, there had been an Excludes1 note at I46.- Cardiac arrest that excluded R57.0, Cardiac shock. HIA had also received a letter from AHA on a case in the past that had stated that only I46.- Cardiac arrest would be coded if both were documented. In addition, the Third Quarter Coding Clinic page 26 had a similar case that asked if both could be coded, and AHA had instructed that only I46.9, cardiac arrest, cause unspecified would be coded if both were documented and that the CDC would be looking at possible revision to the Excludes1 note.
A higher CMI corresponds to increased consumption of resources and increased cost of patient care, resulting in increased reimbursement to the facility from government and private payers, like CMS. We know that documentation directly impacts coding.
Lately we have seen several cases where the endarterectomy was assigned along with the coronary artery bypass (CABG) procedure when being performed on the same vessel to facilitate the CABG. A coronary artery endarterectomy is not always performed during a CABG procedure, so when it is performed it becomes confusing as to whether to code it separately or not.
Assign code Z20.828, “Contact with and (suspected) exposure to other viral communicable diseases” for all patients who are tested for COVID-19 and the results are negative, regardless of symptoms, no symptoms, exposure or not as we are in a pandemic.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced new procedure codes for treatments of COVID-19 – effective as of August 1, 2020. Among the new codes are Section X New Technology codes for the introduction or infusion of therapeutics including Remdesivir, Sarilumab, Tocilizumab, transfusion of convalescent plasma, as well as introduction of any other or new therapeutic substances for the treatment of COVID-19.
One common element in many value-based programs is risk adjustment using Hierarchical Condition Categories (HCCs) to create a Risk Adjustment Factor (RAF) score. This method ranks diagnoses into categories that represent conditions with similar cost patterns.
In previous parts of this series we looked at the definitions of AKI/ARF, causes, coding and sequencing, and the common clinical indicators that patients present with that are diagnosed with this condition. In Part 4, we will look at the documentation that should be present to report the diagnosis without fear of denial, as well as when a query is needed to clarify the diagnosis.
If the facility does a COVID-19 test, and test is negative, do I need a diagnosis code. The answer is yes, you will report a Z-code. The Z-code depends on the record documentation and circumstances of testing. For any patient receiving a COVID-19 test, if negative, there MUST e a Z-code to describe why the test was taken. (Test negative for COVID-19 and MD does not override negative results).
In the first parts of this series we looked at definitions of AKI/ARF, causes, coding and sequencing. In Part 3, we will look at what clinical indicators would possibly be present to support the diagnosis of AKI/ARF.
The FY2021 IPPS Proposed Rule is out and here are some highlights from it regarding ICD-10 Code proposals. We will know if these changes are permanent after the public comment period is over on July 10, 2020 and CMS prepares the Final Rule, usually out by August 1.
As discussed in Part 1 of this series, AKI/ARF is a common diagnosis that coders see daily. In Part 2, we are going to focus on the different types/specificity of AKI/ARF. We’ll learn what they mean, as well as how to code the diagnosis.
This is part 1 in a series focused on coding of acute kidney injury (AKI) and/or acute renal failure (ARF). AKI/ARF is reported often, but is also one of the most common diagnosis found in denials.