Part 3 – New 2019 CPT Codes: Cardiovascular System
RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS‑P, CIRCC
Executive Director Of Education
AHIMA‑Approved ICD‑10‑CM/PCS Trainer and Ambassador
This is Part 3 of a five part series on the new 2019 CPT codes. In this series we will explore the CPT changes for FY2019 and include examples to help the coder understand the new codes. There are 9 new cardiovascular CPT codes added with 2 deletions and 3 revisions.
Permanent Leadless Pacemaker
Two new codes, 33274, Transcatheter insertion or replacement of permanent leadless pacemaker, right ventricular, including imaging guidance (e.g., fluoroscopy, venous ultrasound, ventriculography, femoral venography) and device evaluation (e.g., interrogation or programming), when performed and 33275, Transcatheter removal of permanent leadless pacemaker, right ventricular replace category III codes 0387T, 0388T from last year. A permanent leadless pacemaker is delivered via a catheter through the femoral vein and positioned inside of the right ventricle of the heart. For a description of the device, review the information on this website: https://medicalxpress.com/news/2017-05-world-smallest-leadless-pacemaker-yields.html
Cardiac Rhythm Monitor
Two new codes, 33285, Insertion, subcutaneous cardiac rhythm monitor including programming. (Also known as cardiac event monitor or (ILR) insertable loop recorder) and 33286 Removal, subcutaneous cardiac rhythm monitor were created for this device. It is a small 1 2/3 inch long device that is subcutaneously placed in a pocket via parasternal incision. This device continuously records electrocardiographic rhythm triggered by irregular heart rates for up to three years. More info can be found here: https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/implantable-loop-recorder/pyc-20384986
Pulmonary Artery Pressure Monitor
Code 33289, Transcatheter implantation of wireless pulmonary artery pressure sensor for long term hemodynamic monitoring including deployment and calibration of the sensor, right heart catheterization, selective pulmonary catheterization, radiological S&I and pulmonary artery angiography when performed was created for this subcutaneously placed device. Like the cardiac monitor, it is placed in a pocket via a small parasternal incision. It continuously records the pulmonary artery pressure and heart rate. It is used mainly in class III heart failure patients. CardioMEMS is one such device.
Replace Aortic Valve by Translocation of Pulmonary Valve
Code 33440 Replacement aortic valve, by translocation of autologous pulmonary valve and transventricular aortic annulus enlargement of the left ventricular outflow tract with valved conduit replacement of pulmonary valve (Ross-Konno procedure). In layman’s terms it means that they will take out the diseased aortic valve and replace with patient’s own pulmonary valve. Patient will then get a pig valve in the place of the pulmonary valve. The reason for trading valves is because the pulmonary valve get less ‘traffic’ and is better able to handle the pig valve in its place rather than the high traffic aortic valve.
Aortic Arch Hemiarch Graft
Add on code +33866 Aortic hemiarch graft including isolation and control of the arch vessels, beveled open distal aortic anastomosis extending under one or more of the arch vessels, and total circulatory arrest or isolated cerebral perfusion (List separately in addition to primary procedure). Aortic hemiarch graft may be necessary in addition to ascending aortic graft. It requires total circulatory arrest or isolated cerebral perfusion, incision into the transverse arch under one or more of the arch vessels such as innominate, left common carotid, or left subclavian; and extension of the ascending, aortic graft under the aortic arch without a cross clamp (an open anastomosis). For more information, see https://www.emoryhealthcare.org/centers-programs/aortic-center/types-of-aortic-repairs/ascendingaorta.html
Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheter (PICC)
Revised and new codes were added to accommodate PICC insertion without guidance or with guidance. The codes are: 36568, 36569, Insertion of PICC without port or pump, added “without imaging guidance” (PICCs placed with magnetic or other guidance that is not imaging)
- 36572, Insertion of PICC without port or pump, including all imaging guidance, image documentation, and all associated radiological S&I required to perform the insertion, younger than 5 years of age
- 36573, Age 5 years or older
▲ 36584, Replacement, complete, of PICC without port or pump, through same venous access, added “including all imaging guidance image documentation, and all associated radiological S&I required to perform the replacement.
The imaging guidance is usually fluoroscopy or ultrasound. Midline catheters are NOT central catheters and should be reported with 36400, 36405, 36406 or 36410, the venipuncture codes.
Coronary Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)
Add on code +0523T Intraprocedural coronary fractional flow reserve (FFR) with 3D functional mapping of color-coded FFR values for the coronary tree, derived from coronary angiogram data, for real-time review and interpretation of possible arteriosclerotic stenosis(es) intervention. (List separately in addition to primary procedure) has been added. This study provides real time color values of the coronary tree to help assist the cardiologist in assessing the coronary vessels.
Femoral-Popliteal Stent Grafts
New code 0505T, Endovenous femoral-popliteal arterial revascularization, with transcatheter placement of intravascular stent graft(s) and closure by any method, including percutaneous or open vascular access, ultrasound guidance for vascular access when performed all catherization(s) and intraprocedural roadmapping and imaging guidance necessary to complete the intervention, when performed, with crossing of the occlusive lesion in an extraluminal fashion, was added for this new type of stent grafting.
This stent graft treats femoropopliteal artery stenosis/occlusion and aneurysms. Usually a crossing device is used. Note that the graft must go INTO the adjacent vein, usually the femoral vein. If not, it is NOT 0505T. See this website for a good photo of this type of graft: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20180222005540/en/PQ-Bypass-Announces-Patient-Treated-Landmark-DETOUR
Wireless Cardiac Stimulation
There are several new codes for wireless cardiac stimulation:
- 0515T Insertion of wireless cardiac stimulator for left ventricular pacing, including device interrogation and programming, imaging S&I, complete system (includes electrode and generator-transistor and battery) (EBR WiSE CRT system)
- 0516T electrode only
- 0517T pulse generator (battery and/or transmitter)only
- 0518T Removal of only pulse generator component(s) (battery and/or transmitter) of wireless cardiac stimulator for left ventricular pacing
- 0519T Removal and replacement of only pulse generator component(s) (battery and/or transmitter) of wireless cardiac stimulator for left ventricular pacing
- 0520T pulse generator component(s) (battery and/or transmitter) including placement of a new electrode
- 0521T Interrogation of device in person analysis, review, report, record, etc.
- 0522T Programming device evaluation in person
Note that these codes involve LEFT VENTRICULAR pacing instead of the right side. The left side is a better target for delivery of electric pulses in helping pace the heart, which is why this procedure was created.
Please refer to these websites for more information: medgadget.com/2015/10/wise-wireless-technology-left-ventricle-pacing-without-coronary-sinus-leads-approved-eu-video.html
Endovascular Chemical Ablation
There is one new code, 0524T, Endovenous catheter directed chemical ablation with balloon isolation of incompetent extremity vein, open or percutaneous, including all vascular access, catheter manipulation, diagnostic imaging, imaging guidance, and monitoring. This differs from mechanical occlusion chemical ablation (36473, 36474) in that it uses a balloon, inflated, to isolate the incompetent vein from the other veins in the deep system when delivering the embolizing or sclerosing agents.
Intracardiac Ischemia Monitoring
Several new codes were created:
- 0525T Insertion or replacement of intracardiac ischemia monitoring system, including testing of the lead and monitor, initial system programming and imaging S&I, complete system
- 0526T electrode only
- 0527T implantable monitor only
- 0528T Programming device evaluation in person of intracardiac ischemia monitoring system with iterative adjustment of values, analysis, etc.
- 0529T Interrogation device evaluation in person of intracardiac ischemia monitoring system with analysis, review and report
- 0530T Removal of complete intracardiac ischemia monitoring system
- 0531T Removal of electrode only
- 0532T Removal of implantable monitor only
This device is used to detect and alert patients during a major ischemic coronary event such as a STEMI or NSTEMI. The device can detect and alert patients of both symptomatic and asymptomatic ischemic coronary events.
The information contained in this post is valid at the time of posting. Viewers are encouraged to research subsequent official guidance in the areas associated with the topic as they can change rapidly.
Back in April, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) published a report detailing its findings from a review of two groups of high-risk diagnosis codes, acute stroke and major depressive disorder. The objective was to determine whether selected diagnosis codes submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for use in CMS’s risk adjustment program complied with Federal requirements.
There seems to be differences of opinions on the issue of a 40w0day gestation Can you clarify if P08.21 should be assigned for 40w0day infant or if it would not be assigned unless the infant’s gestation age was 40w1day or greater?
Coders may find situations where a patient is documented as meeting SIRS or sepsis criteria, or has some clinical indicators reflective of possible sepsis, but the physician never documents sepsis as a diagnosis. Should the coder always query for sepsis in these instances?
In this example, would it be appropriate to code the complication code T82.03XA, Leakage of heart valve prosthesis, initial encounter as the principal diagnosis over the HFpEF (heart failure exacerbation) code?
We interviewed our most productive coders and reviewers, asking them what steps they take to find a rhythm that works for them. This week, we talked with Kerry Atkins, CDIP, CCS‑P, COC, CPC, CPCO, CPMA, CEMC, COBGC, RMB, Physician Services Consultant at HIA, about the steps she takes to find her routine.
A higher CMI corresponds to increased consumption of resources and increased cost of patient care, resulting in increased reimbursement to the facility from government and private payers, like CMS. We know that documentation directly impacts coding.
With the implementation of ICD-10-PCS more codes were developed in order to accurately report procedures. Spinal fusion coding is still a problematic coding issue and at times, even a coder’s nightmare. Coders often report only the code for the fusion thinking that one code would include all of the other procedures that are performed.
Answer: I would code 0HPT0NZ for removal of tissue expander from right breast, open and change 0HPT0JZ, removal of synthetic substitute from right breast, open, for removal of the acellular dermal matrix to 0HPT0KZ, Removal of nonautologous tissue substitute from right breast, open approach.
There are certain conditions that have instructional notes in the ICD-10-CM tabular/coding conventions that guide the coder in sequencing. This is especially true when the condition has a common manifestation or underlying conditions of a chronic disease. If there is a “code first” note in the tabular, the coder should follow this instruction and sequence the underlying etiology or chronic condition first followed by the manifestation as an additional diagnosis.
When it comes to coding and documentation, finding your own rhythm can lead to positive results. For our series, Find Your Routine, we interviewed our most productive coders and reviewers and asked them what steps they take to find a rhythm that works for them. This week, we talked with Meghan Schumacher, CPC, CPMA, Provider Coding Consultant at Health Information Associates, Inc., about the steps she takes to find her routine.
Last year, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) performed an investigation that found, “between 2014 and 2016, Medicare Advantage organizations overturned 75% of their preauthorization and payment denials upon appeal,” which is why, at HIA, we always advise our clients to engage in the appeals process.
There may be instances where a coder will suspect the patient has acute kidney injury (AKI), but the physician has failed to document the diagnosis. In another scenario, the physician may have made the diagnosis, but there is a question of clinical validity. In either case, a query would be justified.
Changes to CC/MCC designations included in the proposal could have a potentially dramatic effect on casemix. The presence of a major complication or comorbidity (MCC) or complication or comorbidity (CC) generally is representative of a patient that requires more resources.
How many times have you heard “it only takes one code to get the claim paid”? With the emphasis on the severity of illness and the move toward value-based reimbursement in today’s healthcare climate, it is more important than ever for coders to report all applicable diagnoses. There are three important pieces: what the provider documents, how to the coder interprets that documentation and codes it, and then how it is extrapolated.
The reimbursement landscape is already a complicated one – and the highly-complex claims denials process only adds fuel to the fire. A denied claim is one that has been determined by a payor to be in appropriate. Once a coding specialist amends the errors on a rejected claim, they can resubmit it for consideration. The time-intensive process has a significant impact on the cash flow for any setting in the healthcare environment. They are also very costly to appeal.
When a practitioner documents a diagnosis that does not appear to be supported by the clinical indicators in the health record, a coder has four choices: (1) Code the diagnosis; (2) Ignore the diagnosis; (3) Generate a query to confirm clinical validation of a diagnosis; (4) Follow the facility’s escalation policy for clinical validation.
A California-based healthcare services provider and several of its affiliates have agreed to pay $30 million to resolve allegations they submitted inaccurate information about the health status of beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare Advantage Plans, according to the Department of Justice.
Happy National Volunteer Week! This week we celebrate the impact volunteer work has on building stronger communities. We know that our staff have a positive impact while they’re on the job, and we are proud to share a few ways our #PeopleBehindTheNumbers are taking time to volunteer in their own local communities.
Scrutiny of coding compliance in the growing ambulatory surgical center (ASC) market has increased in recent years from both Medicare and private payers. This will only increase as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) moves towards value-based care.
Patients being admitted for acute renal failure due to dehydration have been happening for many, many years now. Typically what happens is a patient gets dehydrated for one reason or another. Once dehydration sets in, it can quickly start to affect many body organs. This can lead to acute renal/kidney failure/injury.
In December 2018, a Pennsylvania for-profit hospital and health system, and its CEO agreed to pay a total of $12.5 million to settle allegations they submitted false claims to Medicare and other federal health care programs for orthopedic surgeries. The settlement resolves allegations that top executives exploited a loophole – AKA modifier 59 – that allowed them to double bill federal healthcare payers for surgeries and ignored coding consultants who advised them that they were improperly billing.
When it comes to coding and documentation, finding your own rhythm can lead to positive results. For our series, Find Your Routine, we interviewed our most productive coders and asked them what steps they take to find a rhythm that works for them. This week, we talked with Zahra Ghahremani, CCS, Coding Specialist at Health Information Associates, about the steps she takes to find her routine.
All queries require at least two elements – clinical indicators and a query question. Coders can also include multiple choice options for response or leave the query open-ended for a free text response. The order in which these elements are listed in a query is open to coder or facility preference.
One area that coders struggle with is when to report a separate condition code when an already assigned combination code includes the condition. For example, if an obstetric patient is admitted and delivers, and the physician documents “obstetric patient delivered with anemia,” should both code O99.02 Anemia complicating childbirth and D64.9, Anemia, unspecified be coded or should only O99.02 be assigned?
When it comes to coding and documentation, finding your own rhythm can lead to positive results. For our series, Find Your Routine, we interviewed our most productive coders and asked them what steps they take to find a rhythm that works for them. This week, we talked with Donna Cowan, RHIT, CCS, Coding Specialist at Health Information Associates, about the steps she takes to find her routine.
The key to choosing reasonable options for a query response is to remember that the query must stand alone. Any clinical indicators supporting the options must be included in the query itself. In this week’s Query Tip, we provide examples of two queries in which the options for response are not reasonable based on clinical indicators used by coder.
Last week, we looked at tidbits for reporting the ICD-10-CM codes for pregnancy/obstetric records. Now we will look at some for the ICD-10-PCS reporting of these records. In reporting the appropriate ICD-10-PCS codes a coder must know what is included in the terminology of products of conception (POC).
Chances are, we all know someone affected by heart disease and stroke, because about 2,300 Americans die of cardiovascular disease each day, an average of 1 death every 38 seconds. But together we can change that.
There was a time when coding delivery records was considered simple. Many times, these types of records were given to the newer coders. However, as coding becomes more complex, this is no longer the case. With the implementation of ICD-10-CM came more codes for very detailed and specific issues that occur during pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium.