Part 2: Top 5 ICD-10-CM Chapters 2019 | Acute Care Reviews
Kim Carrier RHIT, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P
Director of Coding Quality Assurance
AHIMA Approved ICD-10-CM/PCS Trainer
In 2019, HIA reviewed over 725,600 ICD-10-CM codes from many different facilities including reviews on our own coders. Yesterday we looked at the ICD-10-CM Chapter 21 and today we will focus on the second area with the most coding opportunities found during HIA reviews.
- Z00-Z99—Factors influencing health status and contact with health services
- A00-B99—Certain Infectious and Parasitic Diseases
- I00-I99—Disease of the Circulatory System
- J00-J99—Diseases of the Respiratory System
- E00-E89—Endocrine, Nutritional, and Metabolic Diseases
For Part 2 of this 5-part series, we will look at Chapter 1 within ICD-10-CM—A00-B99—Certain Infectious and Parasitic Diseases. There is no possible way to include every guideline or coding reference for this chapter, but here are some of the most common issues.
Chapter 1: A00-B99—Certain Infectious and Parasitic Diseases:
Chapter 1 in ICD-10-CM has 22 sections. In looking through the recommendations made, it looks like sequencing of sepsis and specificity are the most common recommendations, followed by additions and deletions. However, there is more to this chapter than sepsis. Below are a few areas where coding opportunities were identified during HIA client and internal quality reviews.
- Sequencing of sepsis or determining if sepsis was present on admission or if there are clinical indicators to support this diagnosis
- Sepsis is due to a postprocedural infection or device
- Sepsis being ruled out in the body of the record
- HIV being reported instead of asymptomatic HIV status
- Missed query opportunities
- Confusion with sequencing code of hepatitis, cirrhosis and encephalopathy
In addition to the Official Coding Guidelines for ICD-10-CM for FY 2020, Pages 24-29 that address specific chapter guidelines to follow for reporting infectious and parasitic disease, there are multiple AHA Coding Clinics that discuss some of these in detail. Here are a few of these:
- ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, Fourth Quarter 2017 Pages: 4, 109
- ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, First Quarter 2017 Pages:41, 51
- ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, Third Quarter 2016 Page: 9-14
- ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, First Quarter 2019 Pages: 8-11, 14
- ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, Fourth Quarter 2018 Pages: 16-18 & 89-90
- ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, First Quarter 2016 Pages: 12-13 & 39-40
- ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, First Quarter 2018 Pages: 4-5, 16
- ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, Fourth Quarter 2014 Page: 46
- ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, Second Quarter 2014 Page: 13
Coding Tips for Chapter 1: A00-B99—Certain Infectious and Parasitic Diseases:
- Use additional codes to identify resistance to antimicrobial drugs
- Follow all instructional notes within ICD-10-CM for sequencing and to determine if additional codes would be reported
- Code only confirmed cases of HIV infection/illness
- B20 (HIV infection) should be reported first when patient is admitted for HIV-related conditions
- Z21 (asymptomatic HIV infection status) is reported when documentation states “HIV positive,” “known HIV,” “HIV test positive,” or similar terminology
- Once a patient has developed an HIV-related illness, B20 would always be reported on all subsequent admissions/visits
- In pregnant patients with HIV, codes from Chapter 15—Pregnancy, Childbirth, and the Puerperium (O00-O9A) always take sequencing priority
- Severe sepsis should only be coded when severe sepsis is documented by the physician or there is an associated organ system dysfunction in addition to diagnosis of sepsis
- If the organ failure/dysfunction is not specifically documented to be associated with the diagnosis of sepsis a query would be needed before reporting the diagnosis of severe sepsis
- Urosepsis has no default code in ICD-10-CM and is not synonymous with the term sepsis
- If patient admitted with sepsis due to localized infection, the underlying systemic infection (sepsis) should be assigned first followed by a code for the localized infection as a secondary diagnosis
- Verify that the documentation does not support or suggest that the diagnosis of sepsis is due to a device or post procedure infection
- If sepsis is present with a noninfectious condition, such as trauma, and this condition meets the definition for principal diagnosis, the code for the noninfectious condition should be sequenced first followed by the code for the resulting infection
- If sepsis meets the definition of PDX, it should be sequenced before the associated non-infectious condition. If both the associated non-infectious condition and the infection meet the definition of PDX either may be sequenced as PDX
- Code only confirmed cases of Zika virus
- ICD-10-CM code A41.89 (other specified sepsis) is used to report the diagnosis of viral sepsis
- Do not assign additional bacteria code if the code for sepsis specifies the bacteria—Example: Sepsis due to Escherichia coli UTI. Since the code for E. coli sepsis clearly identifies the bacteria responsible for both conditions, reporting B96.20 (unspecified E. coli) is redundant
Most of the tips above are for sepsis but there are many more diagnosis in this chapter of ICD-10-CM. Sepsis is just a tough area for coders and was our number 1 change for all of 2019.
Be on the lookout for Part 3 of this series. In that part, we will look at I00-I99—diseases of the Circulatory System.
References listed above.
The information contained in this coding advice is valid at the time of posting. Viewers are encouraged to research subsequent official guidance in the areas associated with the topic as they can change rapidly.
One common element in many value-based programs is risk adjustment using Hierarchical Condition Categories (HCCs) to create a Risk Adjustment Factor (RAF) score. This method ranks diagnoses into categories that represent conditions with similar cost patterns.
Why are so many AKI records being denied? It’s hard to give one answer for why so many AKI records are being denied lately, but most appear to be due to the multiple sets of criteria available for use in determining if a patient has AKI, as well as physician documentation. As stated in Part 3 of this series, there are three main criteria/classifications used to diagnose AKI.
In previous parts of this series we looked at the definitions of AKI/ARF, causes, coding and sequencing, and the common clinical indicators that patients present with that are diagnosed with this condition. In Part 4, we will look at the documentation that should be present to report the diagnosis without fear of denial, as well as when a query is needed to clarify the diagnosis.
If the facility does a COVID-19 test, and test is negative, do I need a diagnosis code. The answer is yes, you will report a Z-code. The Z-code depends on the record documentation and circumstances of testing. For any patient receiving a COVID-19 test, if negative, there MUST e a Z-code to describe why the test was taken. (Test negative for COVID-19 and MD does not override negative results).
In the first parts of this series we looked at definitions of AKI/ARF, causes, coding and sequencing. In Part 3, we will look at what clinical indicators would possibly be present to support the diagnosis of AKI/ARF.
The FY2021 IPPS Proposed Rule is out and here are some highlights from it regarding ICD-10 Code proposals. We will know if these changes are permanent after the public comment period is over on July 10, 2020 and CMS prepares the Final Rule, usually out by August 1.
As discussed in Part 1 of this series, AKI/ARF is a common diagnosis that coders see daily. In Part 2, we are going to focus on the different types/specificity of AKI/ARF. We’ll learn what they mean, as well as how to code the diagnosis.
This is part 1 in a series focused on coding of acute kidney injury (AKI) and/or acute renal failure (ARF). AKI/ARF is reported often, but is also one of the most common diagnosis found in denials.
With the proliferation of COVID-19 cases, we thought we would put together a quick reference listing of some of the common scenarios that coders have asked about. As with all coding, coders should follow Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting and the COVD-19 Frequently Asked Questions document by the AHA.
Effective March 1, Medicare will pay physicians for telehealth services at the same rate as in-person visits for all diagnoses, not just services related to COVID-19. This great for providers whose patients are reluctant to visit the office.
The biggest reasons why some hospital systems are moving to single path coding is to eliminate duplicative processes and to optimize productivity. In addition, costs are reduced when only one coder “touches” the record and completes both types of coding.
Effective with 4/1/2020 discharges, ICD-10-CM code U07.0 is used to report vaping -related disorders. ICD-10-CM code U07.0 (vaping related disorder) should be used when documentation supports that the patient has a lung-related disorder from vaping. This code is found in the new ICD-10-CM Chapter 22. U07.0 will be in listed in the ICD-10-CM manual under a new section: Provisional assignment of new disease of uncertain etiology or emergency use.
The US government and public-health officials are urging consumers to utilize telemedicine for remote treatment, fill prescriptions and get medical attention during the new coronavirus pandemic. The goal is to keep people with symptoms at home and to practice social distancing if their condition doesn’t warrant more intensive hospital care.
Coronavirus: Tips for working from home. Companies around the world have told their employees to stay home and work remotely. Whether you’re a new to this concept or a work from home veteran, here’s some tips to staying productive from our #HIAfamily.
This is the final part of a three part series in which we address how coders can better interact with Clinical Documentation Improvement (CDI) professionals. In this part, we provide an actual example of an effective communication response to CDI.
This is part two of a three part series in which we address how coders can better interact with Clinical Documentation Improvement (CDI) professionals. In this part, we discuss mismatches and how to best go about resolving them. In part three we will provide a case example of best practice interaction.
This is part one of a three part series in which we address how coders can better interact with Clinical Documentation Integrity (CDI) professionals. Many times these departments are separate and the remote environment makes it difficult to interact efficiently between the two departments. In part one, we will discuss the history and objectives of CDI so the coder has a better understanding of CDI’s role.
One reason that coders should report chronic conditions (including history and status codes) on outpatient records is the HCC’s—Hierarchical Condition Categories. The quick and easy explanation of what HCC’s are is each HCC is mapped to certain ICD-10-CM codes or code ranges. HCC coding is designed to estimate future health care costs for patients.
For Part 5 of this 5-part series, we will look at Chapter 4 within ICD-10-CM—E00-E89—Endocrine, Nutritional, and Metabolic Diseases. There is no possible way to include every guideline or coding reference for this chapter, but here are some of the most common issues.
For Part 4 of this 5-part series, we will look at Chapter 10 within ICD-10-CM—J00-J99—Diseases of the Respiratory System. There is no possible way to include every guideline or coding reference for this chapter, but here are some of the most common issues.
For Part 3 of this 5 part series, we will look at Chapter 9 within ICD-10-CM—I00-I99—Diseases of the Circulatory System. This chapter contains so many of the everyday diagnoses that we code such as hypertension, heart disease and stroke.
For Part 1 of this 5-part series, we will look at Chapter 21 within ICD-10-CM—Z00-Z99—Factors influencing health status and contact with health services. There is no possible way to include every guideline or coding reference for this chapter, but I’ll do my best to touch on some off the most common issues.
The HIM world has been buzzing recently with discussion of “Social Determinants of Health” and coded data. What does this mean for coders and the HIM field?
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is in process of developing a new code for the COVID-19 (coronavirus) that will be released October 1, 2020. In the meantime, the CDC has provided advice on coding the COVID-19 coronavirus.
We’re finally at the #1 most common DRG with recommendations by HIA for 2019. Just to recap, HIA reviewed over 50,000 inpatient records in 2019. Most have probably already guessed what the correct DRG would be with the most recommendations. There are just some diagnoses and DRG’s that will always be a thorn in the side for coders. #1 DRG with the most recommendations during HIA reviews : DRG 871—Septicemia or severe sepsis w/o mechanical ventilation >96 hours with MCC
We’re now at the second most common DRG with recommendations by HIA for 2019. Just to recap, HIA reviewed over 50,000 inpatient records in 2019. We are counting down to # 1. #2 DRG with the most recommendations during HIA reviews: DRG 872—Septicemia or severe sepsis w/o mechanical ventilation >96 hours w/o MCC.
In 2019, HIA reviewed over 50,000 inpatient records. Wow! That is a lot of records. Even with this large number of records, the DRG’s with recommendations are still the ones that coders typically see during audits. #3 DRG 190—Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with MCC.
In 2019, HIA reviewed over 50,000 inpatient records. Wow! That is a lot of records. Even with this large number of records, the DRG’s with recommendations are still the ones that coders typically see during audits. #4 is DRG 193—Simple pneumonia & pleurisy with MCC.
In 2019, HIA reviewed over 50,000 inpatient records. Wow! That is a lot of records. Even with this large number of records, the DRG’s with recommendations are still the ones that coders typically see during audits. #5 DRG with the most recommendations during HIA reviews : DRG 853—Infectious & Parasitic diseases with O.R. procedure with MCC