Coding Tip: FY2022 IPPS Final Rule and Unspecified Laterality Diagnosis Codes
RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS‑P, CIRCC
Executive Director Of Education
AHIMA‑Approved ICD‑10‑CM/PCS Trainer and Ambassador
Did you get a chance to read the FY2022 IPPS Final Rule? There is an interesting topic that was discussed regarding unspecified ICD-10-CM laterality diagnosis codes, to be exact. In this coding tip we discuss that subject and possible ramifications of it in the coding world.
Unspecified ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Codes History
Throughout the history of ICD-CM, there have been unspecified diagnosis codes. This is because many times there is not sufficient information in the patient record or clinical information for the physician to make specific diagnoses. An ICD-10-CM code is considered unspecified if either of the terms “unspecified” or “NOS” are used in the code description. Coders are forced to use unspecified codes when further information is not documented. Way back in 2015, right around the time ICD-10 was implemented, there was talk of the elimination or the denial of the use of unspecified diagnosis codes on claims. There was quite a bit of uproar as requiring specific diagnosis codes and the querying that would be needed to accomplish this would have been overly burdensome for hospitals and providers right at the time of ICD-10 implementation. While diagnosis code specificity has always been the goal, providers were granted a reprieve in order to facilitate implementation of ICD-10. For the first 12 months of ICD-10-CM use, the CMS promised that Medicare review contractors would not deny claims “based solely on the specificity of the ICD-10-CM diagnosis code, as long as the physician/practitioner used a valid code from the right family.” Referred to as the “grace period,” this flexibility was intended to help providers implement the ICD-10-CM code set and was never intended to be permanent. In fact, this CMS-granted grace period expired on October 1, 2016. Some third party payors started denying unspecified codes, but this has been intermittent depending on the payor.
Even our Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting state:
- Conventions for the ICD-10-CM
- Other and Unspecified codes
- “Unspecified” codes
Codes titled “unspecified” are for use when the information in the medical record is insufficient to assign a more specific code. For those categories for which an unspecified code is not provided, the “other specified” code may represent both other and unspecified.
Unspecified Laterality ICD-10-CM Codes and FY2022 IPPS Changes
In the FY2022 Proposed Rule, CMS requested public comments on a potential change to the severity level designations for “unspecified” ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes that CMS was considering adopting for FY 2022. In connection with that request, they were also requesting public comments on the potential creation of a new MCE code edit involving these “unspecified” codes for FY 2022. Specifically, this MCE code edit could be triggered when an “unspecified” diagnosis code currently designated as either a CC or MCC, that includes other codes available in that code subcategory that further specify the anatomic site, is entered. We refer the reader to table 6P.3a which is on the CMS website listed in the below link for the list of unspecified diagnosis codes that would be subject to this edit. Currently there are 3,490 unspecified codes.
This MCE edit would signal to the provider that a more specific code is available to report. CMS believes this edit aligns with documentation improvement efforts and leverages the specificity within ICD-10.
In response to the FY2022 Proposed Rule comment period, “A number of commenters recommended (or urged) CMS to delay any possible change to the designation of these codes for at least two years to give hospitals and their physicians time to prepare.”
So in the FY2022 Final Rule, CMS stated it is not changing severity levels, at least not yet. However what they DID finalize was this:
“After consideration of the public comments received, we are finalizing the implementation of a new code edit for “unspecified” codes, where there are other codes available in that code subcategory that further specify the anatomic site. As noted previously, the severity level of the unspecified diagnosis codes is unaffected and therefore this edit does not affect the payment the provider is eligible to receive.”
“We also note that, in consideration of commenters’ concerns that more time is needed to educate providers, the implementation date for this new edit is April 1, 2022. As such, we are finalizing the new edit for FY 2022, effective with discharges on and after April 1, 2022.” We are finalizing a new “Unspecified Code Edit: to read as follows:
- Unspecified Code Edit: Unspecified codes exist in the ICD-10-CM classification for circumstances when documentation in the medical record does not provide the level of detail needed to support reporting a more specific code. However, in the inpatient setting, there should generally be very limited and rare circumstances for which the laterality (right, left, bilateral) of a condition is unable to be documented and reported.
The list of codes subject to this edit are identified in Table 6P.3a associated with this final rule.
When a code from the list displayed in Table 6P.3a is entered on the claim, the edit will be triggered. It is the provider’s responsibility to determine if a more specific code from that subcategory is available in the medical record documentation by a clinical provider. If, upon review, additional information to identify the laterality from the available medical record documentation by any other clinical provider is unable to be obtained or there is documentation in the record that the physician is clinically unable to determine the laterality because of the nature of the disease/condition, then the provider must enter that information into the remarks section. Specifically, the provider may enter “UNABLE TO DET LAT 1” to identify that they are unable to obtain additional information to specify laterality or they may enter “UNABLE TO DET LAT 2” to identify that the physician is clinically unable to determine laterality.” If not entered, the claim will be returned.
Unspecified ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Code Rate and What Hospitals Can Do
Hospitals and other providers may want to take a look at their unspecified diagnosis code rate before implementation of the above edit with discharges beginning April 1, 2022. The unspecified diagnosis code rate is calculated by dividing the number of unspecified diagnosis codes by the total number of diagnosis codes assigned. Health information management professionals should be tracking and trending unspecified diagnosis code rates across the continuum of care. This can also be drilled down to unspecified laterality codes. Keep in mind that this is not really an error rate per se, but is an indicator of the quality of medical record documentation. Early on in FY2016 when ICD-10 was implemented, HIA conducted numerous medical record reviews to determine the level of unspecified code use and made recommendations as to how our clients could improve specified code use through provider education. Hospitals and other providers may want to perform similar audits before the April 1, 2022 implementation date. A review of the clinical documentation associated with these codes may reveal clinical details needed to assign a more specific diagnosis code.
Final Rule: https://www.cms.gov/medicare/acute-inpatient-pps/fy-2022-ipps-final-rule-home-page
FY2022 Final Rule Tables: https://www.cms.gov/medicare/acute-inpatient-pps/fy-2022-ipps-final-rule-home-page#Tables
The information contained in this post is valid at the time of posting. Viewers are encouraged to research subsequent official guidance in the areas associated with the topic as they can change rapidly.
In Part 4 of the series, we will review the NTAP procedure codes and reimbursement add-on payments. Prepare yourself as this is rather lengthy due to continuation of NTAP that would normally expire.
Coders are instructed, at this time, to follow the AHA Frequently Asked Questions Regarding ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding for COVID-19. Lately, we have seen missing PCS codes for the new technology drugs that were introduced on August 1, 2020 and thereafter.
With the creation and implementation of ICD-10-CM, multiple codes are available to describe the type of pulmonary emboli that occur.
Hypercoagulable states are blood disorders that increase the risk of deep vein thrombosis or embolic disease. The state is either inherited or acquired. About 80% of patients with blood clots have been found to have either an inherited or acquired clotting disorder. These blood clots can be lethal and some require life-long therapy. Hypercoagulable state is also known as thrombophilia.
Encephalopathy is a general term and means brain disease, brain damage or malfunction. Physicians often use encephalopathy and altered mental status interchangeably. When coders see this documentation in the healthcare records, they typically need to query the physician for clarification of the diagnosis.
Spinal procedure coding can be daunting for coders. The spine itself can be quite complicated anatomically and the procedures done to address spinal conditions can be even more complicated!
In June CMS released the final ICD-10-PCS codes for FY2022, which begins October 1, 2021. We are giving you a sneak peek at the changes. HIA will have a full educational module on these changes available later this summer.
CMS released the IPPS proposed rule on 4/27/21 outlining the proposed changes to the Inpatient Prospective Payment System for FY2022, which begins October 1, 2021. Later this year, sometime in August, CMS will release the Final Rule. Currently CMS is reviewing responses to their proposed rule and will address them in the final rule.
A medical coding audit is a process that includes internal or external reviews of medical coding and billing accuracy, procedures or policies in place, and any other component that affects the medical record documentation. Medical coding audits…
Anticoagulants and antiplatelets are used for the prevention and treatment of blood clots that occur in blood vessels. Oftentimes, anticoagulants and antiplatelets are referred to as “blood thinners,” but they don’t actually thin the blood at all. These drugs slow down the body’s process of making clots. Their main function is to keep the patient’s blood from clotting or turning into solid clumps of cells. These drugs do this by interfering with either fibrin or platelets in the blood.
Carotid artery disease is a vague category that can incorporate many different carotid artery issues. Some physicians may feel that they are being clear the patient has plaque, stenosis, or occlusion of the artery, but in ICD-10-CM the specificity must be included in the documentation.
10 ICD-10 Codes for Superheroes. Superman: T78.2XXA Anaphylactic reaction; substance: kryptonite. Batman: F44.81 Dissociative identity disorder. Robin: F60.7 dependent personality. The Hulk: L30.4 Erythema intertrigo. Wonder Woman: T24.032A Burn of unspecified degree of left lower leg. Black Panther S93.401A Sprain…
Practices have not seen many revisions to the Evaluation and Management (E/M) office / outpatient visit guidelines in three decades – until now. As of January 1, there are new E/M coding guidelines. We’ll get to those in a bit, but first let’s look at why they changed.
Pseudoseizures are a form of non-epileptic seizure. These are difficult to diagnose and oftentimes extremely difficult for the patient to comprehend. The term “pseudoseizures” is an older term that is still used today to describe psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES).
With the implementation of ICD-10-CM came different codes and coding rules for many diagnoses. One of these is the coding of bowel obstruction when the patient presents for this condition that is caused by another condition.
This is Part 5 of a five part series on the new 2021 CPT codes. For the remaining areas we will just briefly summarize the section. Due to the intricate nature of these sections in CPT, it is recommended that the coder read the entire section notes associated with the new codes.
This is Part 4 of a five part series on the new 2021 CPT codes. In this series we will explore the CPT changes in the urinary, nervous, ocular and auditory systems. There are 2 new urinary/male reproductive system codes with no revisions or deletions; 3 new female reproductive codes with 2 deletions, 0 new with 4 deleted nervous system codes with 5 revisions; 5 new eye category III codes; and finally a 2 new auditory codes with one deletion.
This is Part 3 of a five part series on the new 2021 CPT codes. In this series we will explore the cardiovascular system CPT changes. There are 5 new cardiovascular CPT codes added with 0 deletions and 4 revisions.
This is Part 2 of a five part series on the new 2021 CPT codes. In this series we will explore the CPT changes for FY2021 and include some examples to help the coder understand the new codes. There are 0 new musculoskeletal CPT codes added with 0 deletions and 2 major revisions along with an extensive update to arthroscopic loose body removal requirements. For the respiratory system, there were 2 new codes, one code deletion and no revisions.
This is Part 1 of a five part series on the new 2021 CPT codes. In this series we will explore the CPT changes for FY2021 and include examples to help the coder understand the new codes. For 2021 in general, there were 199 new CPT codes added, 54 deleted and 69 revised.
We have seen many updates and changes to COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) since the pandemic started. On January 1, 2021 we will see even more changes as outlined in this post. Also the CMS MS-DRG grouper will be updated to version 38.1 to accommodate the changes.
In the previous three parts of this four-part series, we discussed the new ICD-10-CM diagnosis code changes, ICD-10-PCS procedure code changes and FY2021 IPPS changes. In this last Part 4 of the series, we will review the NTAP procedure codes and reimbursement add-on payments for FY2021.
In the previous two parts of this four part series, we discussed the new ICD-10-CM diagnosis code changes and ICD-10-PC procedure code changes. In this session we will review the major IPPS changes for FY2021.
This is Part 2 of a 4 part series on the FY2021 ICD-10 Code and IPPS changes. In this part, the ICD-10-PCS procedure codes are presented. For FY2021 ICD-10-PCS there are 78,115 total codes (FY2020 total was 77,571); 556 new codes (734 new last year in FY2020)…
This is Part 1 of a 4 part series on the FY2021 changes to ICD-10 and the IPPS. In this part, we discuss some of the new ICD-10-CM diagnosis changes. Here is the breakdown: 72,616 total ICD-10-CM codes for FY2021; 490 new codes (2020 had 273 new codes); 58 deleted codes (2020 had 21 deleted codes); 47 revised codes (2020 had 30 revised codes)
Acute pulmonary edema is the rapid accumulation of fluid within the tissue and space around the air sacs of the lung (lung interstitium). When this fluid collects in the air sacs in the lungs it is difficult to breathe. Acute pulmonary edema occurs suddenly and is life threatening.