Coding Tip: Importance of Reporting Glasgow Coma Scale
This Coding Tip was updated on 3/15/2019
Kim Carrier RHIT, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P
Director of Coding Quality Assurance
AHIMA Approved ICD-10-CM/PCS Trainer
Prior to October 1, 2016, the coma scale was only reported in conjunction with traumatic brain injuries, acute cerebrovascular disease or sequelae of cerebrovascular disease codes. Coders should now be reporting the GCS when documented on any case where there is monitoring of the central nervous system regardless of the medical condition requiring the monitoring, except when the patient is receiving sedation for medically induced coma or medications intended to sedate.
The documentation of the coma scale may be documented by other clinicians involved in the care of the patient (EMT, nursing) and not only by the physician. The physician must have documented the associated diagnosis (why the GCS is being addressed) such as encephalopathy, stroke, overdose, etc.
When reporting the GCS, a code from each category is needed to complete the scale. At a minimum, report the initial score documented on presentation to your facility. This may be from EMT or from the ED. Only report the total score when there is no documentation in the record indicating the individual scores.
The 7th character indicates when the scale was recorded and should match for all three codes when reporting the individual scores.
Did you know that some of the GCS are MCC’s when grouped with certain diagnoses? R40.2214 (coma scale, best verbal response, none, 24 hours or more after hospital admission) is an MCC for a patient with an overdose, pneumonia, encephalopathy, and intestinal disorders along with many/most other selections of PDX. These codes can also impact the SOI/ROM when reported.
Please check with the facility that you are coding for to determine how they want these captured. Some facilities are capturing them only on arrival and others are capturing multiple times while some are only capturing the total number. It is important that these are reported appropriately since they do impact the DRG and SOI/ROM on some cases.
In the case were a patient is given medications intended to sedate the patient, if it is unclear, the coder may need to inquire with the facility or the physician regarding certain drugs. The intent of the GCS codes are to capture the patient’s coma status that is not manipulated by sedating medications.
Here’s a couple of examples of when reporting the GCS would impact the DRG and/or SOI/ROM:
- Patient is found in their nursing home with labored breathing and ambulance is called. The patient is found to have a possible pneumonia and transported to the ED. The patient is confused and unable to respond to any questions and is nonverbal in the ambulance and does not open their eyes. Motor response is documented as abnormal by EMT. On discharge the patient is diagnosed with pneumonia (J18.9) and sent back to the nursing home. The coder should also assign R40.2211 (Coma scale, best verbal response, none, in the field [EMT or ambulance]), R40.2111 (Coma scale, eyes open, never, in the field [EMT or ambulance]), and R40.2331 (Coma scale, best motor response, abnormal, in the field [EMT or ambulance]). These codes result in MS-DRG 193 (Simple Pneumonia and Pleurisy with MCC.) The APR-DRG is 139 (Other pneumonia) with an SOI as 3-Major and ROM as 4-Extreme. If the GCS codes are taken away and only the total is reported (which was 3-R40.2431) the result is MS-DRG 195 (Simple Pneumonia and Pleurisy without CC/MCC) and APR DRG 139, Other Pneumonia with an SOI as 1-Minor and ROM as 1-Minor.
- Patient is brought into the ED with possible OD of heroin. The patient is found on presentation to the ED to be nonverbal, does not open eyes and has no motor responses. The patient is admitted to ICU and monitored and responds to treatment. The OD is determined to be accidental as the patient denies any suicidal intent or thoughts. Patient is discharged with accidental heroin OD. The coder should assign T40.1X1A (Poisoning by heroin, accidental (unintentional), initial encounter) as well as R40.2312 (Coma scale, best motor response, none, at arrival to emergency department), R40.2112 (Coma scale, eyes open, never at arrival to emergency department) and R40.2212 (Coma scale, best verbal response, none, at arrival to emergency department). These codes result in MS-DRG 917 (Poisoning and Toxic Effects of Drugs with MCC). The APR-DRG is 816 (Toxic effects of non-medicinal substances) with an SOI as 3-Major and ROM as 4-Extreme. If the individual GCS codes are taken away and only the total score reported R40.2212 the result is MS-DRG 918 (Poisoning and Toxic Effects of Drugs without MCC). APR-DRG is 816, Toxic effects of non-medicinal substances and an SOI as 1-Minor and ROM as 1-Minor.
AHA Coding Clinic, Fourth Quarter 2018 Page: 70
AHA Coding Clinic, Fourth Quarter 2017 Page: 95
ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting FY 2019
The information contained in this coding advice is valid at the time of posting. Viewers are encouraged to research subsequent official guidance in the areas associated with the topic as they can change rapidly.
One common element in many value-based programs is risk adjustment using Hierarchical Condition Categories (HCCs) to create a Risk Adjustment Factor (RAF) score. This method ranks diagnoses into categories that represent conditions with similar cost patterns.
Why are so many AKI records being denied? It’s hard to give one answer for why so many AKI records are being denied lately, but most appear to be due to the multiple sets of criteria available for use in determining if a patient has AKI, as well as physician documentation. As stated in Part 3 of this series, there are three main criteria/classifications used to diagnose AKI.
In previous parts of this series we looked at the definitions of AKI/ARF, causes, coding and sequencing, and the common clinical indicators that patients present with that are diagnosed with this condition. In Part 4, we will look at the documentation that should be present to report the diagnosis without fear of denial, as well as when a query is needed to clarify the diagnosis.
If the facility does a COVID-19 test, and test is negative, do I need a diagnosis code. The answer is yes, you will report a Z-code. The Z-code depends on the record documentation and circumstances of testing. For any patient receiving a COVID-19 test, if negative, there MUST e a Z-code to describe why the test was taken. (Test negative for COVID-19 and MD does not override negative results).
In the first parts of this series we looked at definitions of AKI/ARF, causes, coding and sequencing. In Part 3, we will look at what clinical indicators would possibly be present to support the diagnosis of AKI/ARF.
The FY2021 IPPS Proposed Rule is out and here are some highlights from it regarding ICD-10 Code proposals. We will know if these changes are permanent after the public comment period is over on July 10, 2020 and CMS prepares the Final Rule, usually out by August 1.
As discussed in Part 1 of this series, AKI/ARF is a common diagnosis that coders see daily. In Part 2, we are going to focus on the different types/specificity of AKI/ARF. We’ll learn what they mean, as well as how to code the diagnosis.
This is part 1 in a series focused on coding of acute kidney injury (AKI) and/or acute renal failure (ARF). AKI/ARF is reported often, but is also one of the most common diagnosis found in denials.
With the proliferation of COVID-19 cases, we thought we would put together a quick reference listing of some of the common scenarios that coders have asked about. As with all coding, coders should follow Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting and the COVD-19 Frequently Asked Questions document by the AHA.
Effective March 1, Medicare will pay physicians for telehealth services at the same rate as in-person visits for all diagnoses, not just services related to COVID-19. This great for providers whose patients are reluctant to visit the office.
The biggest reasons why some hospital systems are moving to single path coding is to eliminate duplicative processes and to optimize productivity. In addition, costs are reduced when only one coder “touches” the record and completes both types of coding.
Effective with 4/1/2020 discharges, ICD-10-CM code U07.0 is used to report vaping -related disorders. ICD-10-CM code U07.0 (vaping related disorder) should be used when documentation supports that the patient has a lung-related disorder from vaping. This code is found in the new ICD-10-CM Chapter 22. U07.0 will be in listed in the ICD-10-CM manual under a new section: Provisional assignment of new disease of uncertain etiology or emergency use.
The US government and public-health officials are urging consumers to utilize telemedicine for remote treatment, fill prescriptions and get medical attention during the new coronavirus pandemic. The goal is to keep people with symptoms at home and to practice social distancing if their condition doesn’t warrant more intensive hospital care.
Coronavirus: Tips for working from home. Companies around the world have told their employees to stay home and work remotely. Whether you’re a new to this concept or a work from home veteran, here’s some tips to staying productive from our #HIAfamily.
This is the final part of a three part series in which we address how coders can better interact with Clinical Documentation Improvement (CDI) professionals. In this part, we provide an actual example of an effective communication response to CDI.
This is part two of a three part series in which we address how coders can better interact with Clinical Documentation Improvement (CDI) professionals. In this part, we discuss mismatches and how to best go about resolving them. In part three we will provide a case example of best practice interaction.
This is part one of a three part series in which we address how coders can better interact with Clinical Documentation Integrity (CDI) professionals. Many times these departments are separate and the remote environment makes it difficult to interact efficiently between the two departments. In part one, we will discuss the history and objectives of CDI so the coder has a better understanding of CDI’s role.
One reason that coders should report chronic conditions (including history and status codes) on outpatient records is the HCC’s—Hierarchical Condition Categories. The quick and easy explanation of what HCC’s are is each HCC is mapped to certain ICD-10-CM codes or code ranges. HCC coding is designed to estimate future health care costs for patients.
For Part 5 of this 5-part series, we will look at Chapter 4 within ICD-10-CM—E00-E89—Endocrine, Nutritional, and Metabolic Diseases. There is no possible way to include every guideline or coding reference for this chapter, but here are some of the most common issues.
For Part 4 of this 5-part series, we will look at Chapter 10 within ICD-10-CM—J00-J99—Diseases of the Respiratory System. There is no possible way to include every guideline or coding reference for this chapter, but here are some of the most common issues.
For Part 3 of this 5 part series, we will look at Chapter 9 within ICD-10-CM—I00-I99—Diseases of the Circulatory System. This chapter contains so many of the everyday diagnoses that we code such as hypertension, heart disease and stroke.
For Part 2 of this 5-part series, we will look at Chapter 1 within ICD-10-CM—A00-B99—Certain Infectious and Parasitic Diseases. There is no possible way to include every guideline or coding reference for this chapter, but here are some of the most common issues.
For Part 1 of this 5-part series, we will look at Chapter 21 within ICD-10-CM—Z00-Z99—Factors influencing health status and contact with health services. There is no possible way to include every guideline or coding reference for this chapter, but I’ll do my best to touch on some off the most common issues.
In response to the recent occurrences of vaping related disorders and in consultation with the World Health Organization (WHO) Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, the WHO Family of International Classifications (WHOFIC) Network Classification and Statistics Advisory Committee (CSAC) was convened to discuss a diagnosis code for vaping related illness for immediate use.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is in process of developing a new code for the COVID-19 (coronavirus) that will be released October 1, 2020. In the meantime, the CDC has provided advice on coding the COVID-19 coronavirus.
We’re finally at the #1 most common DRG with recommendations by HIA for 2019. Just to recap, HIA reviewed over 50,000 inpatient records in 2019. Most have probably already guessed what the correct DRG would be with the most recommendations. There are just some diagnoses and DRG’s that will always be a thorn in the side for coders. #1 DRG with the most recommendations during HIA reviews : DRG 871—Septicemia or severe sepsis w/o mechanical ventilation >96 hours with MCC
We’re now at the second most common DRG with recommendations by HIA for 2019. Just to recap, HIA reviewed over 50,000 inpatient records in 2019. We are counting down to # 1. #2 DRG with the most recommendations during HIA reviews: DRG 872—Septicemia or severe sepsis w/o mechanical ventilation >96 hours w/o MCC.
In 2019, HIA reviewed over 50,000 inpatient records. Wow! That is a lot of records. Even with this large number of records, the DRG’s with recommendations are still the ones that coders typically see during audits. #3 DRG 190—Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with MCC.
In 2019, HIA reviewed over 50,000 inpatient records. Wow! That is a lot of records. Even with this large number of records, the DRG’s with recommendations are still the ones that coders typically see during audits. #4 is DRG 193—Simple pneumonia & pleurisy with MCC.