Falling Case Mix Have You Confused?
The ICD-10-CM/PCS code changes – effective October 1, 2018 to September 31, 2019 – could be the culprit.
Comparatively speaking, there are far less changes this year than in years past. The release includes:
- 279 new codes
- 51 deleted codes
- 143 revised codes
But don’t let the smaller amount of changes fool you. During many of our recent reviews, our findings show a big impact when it comes to case mix.
For example, Encephalopathy. Here’s how:
Case 1: Patient admitted for subtrochanteric femur fracture. The patient had operative repair of the fracture with an ORIF. Postop the patient had some confusion the provider documented “acute encephalopathy post op. Likely due to post-anesthesia.”
The coder reported the appropriate principal diagnosis and procedure code but assigned G9340, Encephalopathy unspecified, as a secondary diagnosis. Prior to October 1, 2018 unspecified encephalopathy would have been considered an MCC. The DRG would have been 480, Hip & Femur Procedures Except Major Joint W MCC, CMS weight 3.0304. Post 10/1/2018 unspecified encephalopathy is no longer considered an MCC, but toxic encephalopathy is. Documentation in the record suggests that the encephalopathy may have been caused by the anesthesia. A query to the provider to document the cause/type of the encephalopathy could impact the DRG.
- Pre 10/1/2018 – DRG 480, Hip & Femur Procedures Except Major Joint with MCC, Wt. 3.0304
- Using $5500 as the base rate $16,667.20
- Post 10/1/2018 – DRG 481, Hip & Femur Procedures Except Major Joint with CC, Wt. 2.0623
- Using $5500 as the base rate $11,342.65
- Resulting in a decrease of 0.9681 to the case weight and a reduction of $5,324.55 to reimbursement
Better documentation for the cause/type of encephalopathy could potentially support DRG 480 post 10/1/2018.
Case 2: Patient admitted for hyponatremia and encephalopathy. Documentation on the H&P stated the encephalopathy was metabolic. The coder assigned the appropriate code for hyponatremia as the principal diagnosis. The coder assigned G9340, Encephalopathy unspecified, as a secondary diagnosis.
Documentation in the H&P did support a more specific code for Encephalopathy and code G9341, Metabolic Encephalopathy, could have been reported. The more specific code for Metabolic Encephalopathy is still considered an MCC post 10/01/2018. Unspecified encephalopathy is not.
- Pre 10/1/2018 – DRG 640, Misc Disorders of Nutrition, Metabolism with MCCC, Wt. 1.1902
- Using $5500 as the base rate $6,546.10
- Post 10/1/2018 – DRG 641, Misc Disorders of Nutrition, Metabolism Without MCC, Wt. 0.7519
- Using $5500 as the base rate $4,135.45
- Resulting in a decrease of 0.4383 to the case weight and a reduction of $2,410.65 to reimbursement
Documentation in the record supported a more specific encephalopathy code. The documentation could have been better or documented more during the encounter. However, reporting the more specific code would support DRG 640 post 10/1/2018.
Educate Your Staff with HIAlearn
HIA can provide your coding staff with a comprehensive understanding of these changes via HIAlearn.
Our learning management system provides your staff with on demand access and the flexibility you need to set a training schedule that meets individual needs.
- ICD-10-PCS New Codes FY2019: This two and one half (2.5) hour session, with accompanying aptitude quiz, focuses on the additions/deletions/revisions to ICD-10-PCS, including guideline changes. This session is approved for 2 AHIMA CEUs.
- ICD-10-CM New Codes FY2019: This two and one half (2.5) hour session, with accompanying aptitude quiz, focuses on additions/deletions/revisions for ICD-10-CM for FY2018, including guideline changes. This session is approved for 3 AHIMA CEUs and/or 2.5 AAPC CEUs.
- FY2019 IPPS Changes: This approximately one and one half (1.5) hour session focuses on changes in MS-DRG assignment, reimbursement updates and MCE edits to the IPPS for FY2018. This session is approved for 1.5 AHIMA CEUs.
Our extensive Action Plan Library provides targeted and interactive sessions in an easily digestible format, including one on “Encephalopathy, Altered Mental Status, Dementia and Delirium Coding.”
The Code Hard Truth: Every Code Counts
Complete and accurate documentation + Complete and accurate coding = Complete and accurate reimbursement.
Many of our client partners have reached out to validate that their coding staff has a good understanding of the ICD-10-CM/PCS and IPPS changes with a comprehensive review.
In 2003, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) implemented Risk Adjustment Factors (RAF) and Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) coding to identify individuals with serious and/or chronic illnesses and assign them a risk factor score that is based on a combination of demographic information and reported diagnoses.
With the publication of the new ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting for FY 2019, we finally have an answer regarding reporting of BMI in pregnancy. The new guideline does state “do not assign BMI codes during pregnancy.”
Conflicting documentation occurs when health care providers call the same condition different things. When none of the documented conditions are clearly ruled out by the physician, coders may find it necessary to query for the most appropriate diagnosis.
In reviewing hundreds of contracts, the OIG found that insurers overturned 75% of their own denials upon appeal—approximately 216,000 denials each year. However, while the odds of winning an appeal are seemingly good, many providers simply don’t have the time or the internal staff and infrastructure needed to engage in the process.
When coding a record with documented bullying, this is coded as child or adult psychological abuse (initial/subsequent encounter or sequela) either as confirmed or suspected. The encounter and whether this is confirmed or suspected is needed in order to assign the appropriate diagnosis code.
It’s Halloween season! It’s time to overindulge on candy, fight over the best costume, become irrationally scared of things like the number 13, and have nightmares of your 6th birthday with that terrifying clown. As for us, we’re getting in the spirit with 13 spooky ICD- 10 codes! Beware – it’s scary out there.
Section “X” is a separate place within ICD-10-PCS for certain new technology procedures (such as new technology drugs). Section “X” does not introduce any new coding concepts or unusual guidelines for correct coding and maintains continuity with the other sections in ICD-10-PCS.
Coding Tip: New ICD-10-CM General Coding Guideline — Coding for Healthcare Encounters in Hurricane Aftermath
With the Hurricane season in full swing, this new guideline will be helpful in reporting the external cause codes when an injury occurs as a result of the hurricane, and also help in determining sequencing of the reported codes.
The refined Stroke 30-day mortality measure (MORT-30-STK) is a statistic defined as death occurring within 30 days of a diagnosed stroke. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) publicly reports a 30-day hospital-level stroke mortality measure on Hospital Compare as part of the Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) program.
“Lobar” pneumonia references a form of pneumonia that affects a specific lobe or lobes of the lung. This is a bacterial pneumonia and is most commonly community acquired. Antibiotics are almost always necessary to clear this type of pneumonia.
We have seen a lot of recommendations of late where the coders are coding hydronephrosis, UTI and ureteral stone separately or not with the correct code to include all conditions.
Coders have struggled for some time with the dilemma of when to assign the combination code of carotid stenosis, with cerebral infarction (i.e.I63.231) and when to assign separate codes for the specific cerebral infarction and carotid stenosis. (i.e. I66.01 and I65.21).
Queries in a Yes/No format are limited to use in the four specific circumstances. This format may not be used when only clinical indicators of a condition are present, but the diagnosis has not been documented in the health record.
Queries written in a multiple-choice format include a short list of options for physician response. These options must be relevant and supported by the clinical indicators included in the query.
Since the implementation of ICD-10-PCS in 2015, yearly changes have been made regarding the definition of, and guidelines associated with, the root operation Control. This has caused coding professionals much confusion in determining whether to assign a procedure to root operation Control, to assign another root operation, or to not assign a procedure code at all.
The policies in the IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule further advance the agency’s priority of creating a patient-centered healthcare system by achieving greater price transparency, interoperability, and significant burden reduction so that hospitals can operate with better…
In this current, ever-changing healthcare climate, health systems face many challenges. Facilities large and small must be dedicated to improving documentation and reducing complications, HACs, infection rates, and readmissions as they endeavor towards value-based care. Coding inaccuracies can really undermine…
It’s imperative, in today’s challenging healthcare environment, that organizations demand complete and accurate coding practices from their vendors if they want: Appropriate and timely reimbursement; Representative quality measures; Improved CMI; Reduction in payor denials and; Mitigation of compliance risks.
In addition to positive clinical indicators documented at the time of admission, any of these that occur within the few days after admission should also be included. This will support the fact that sepsis could have developed after admission. It is important that a POA query give equal attention to what supports POA yes, as well as POA no to avoid the appearance of a leading query.
This major proposed rule addresses changes to the Medicare physician fee schedule (PFS) and other Medicare Part B payment policies to ensure that our payment systems are updated to reflect changes in medical practice and the relative value of services, as well as changes in the statute.
For example, open the ICD-11 online link and click on “Browse the release version.” Then choose “Coding Tool” tab at the top. We chose “sepsis.” Sepsis without shock is coded to 1G40. Sepsis with septic shock is coded 1G41. A bit different than ICD-10!
Did you know that by coding hypertension with associated CKD correctly along with any surgical dialysis access creation on patients admitted with hypertension, will keep the case out of the AHRQ PQI #07: Hypertension Admission Rate quality measure?
From a coding perspective, the IABP is not classified as a device such as the VAD’s. The IABP is not coded as a device within ICD-10-PCS and is coded with the root operation of “Assistance.” The ICD-10-PCS code for insertion of an IABP for continuous pumping would be 5A02210, Extracorporeal or Systemic Assistance, Physiologic Systems, Assistance, Cardiac, Continuous, Output, Balloon Pump.
The key to a quality physician query is the question. The question provides direction for the choice of clinical indicators and options for response. So why do so many coders have trouble writing the question? My theory is that coders overthink the question rather than keeping it simple and to the point. The best way to get a physician to answer a query is with a question that makes sense and eliminates guessing as to what is being asked.
Locating ventilator times were difficult in the paper medical record, but has not become any easier with the implementation on the electronic health record (EHR.) Coders should be encouraged to review the record for exact ventilator times. As mentioned above, this could come down to minutes when selecting the correct ICD-10-PCS code.
Hamilton. If you haven’t seen it, you’ve heard of it. The Broadway mega-hit has been the toughest ticket on Broadway since its debut in 2015. For the uninitiated, Hamilton explores the life and triumphs of the previously obscure “ten-dollar founding father,” Alexander Hamilton, through rap, hip-hop, and musical theatre.
Procedure code assignment for excisional debridement has always been a focus area in coding audits. The biggest concern is whether or not the debridement is truly excisional in nature, and if the documentation truly supports an excisional debridement. HIA has written a previous Coding Tip on determining nonexcisional vs excisional debridement.
Beth Martilik, MA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS Assistant Director of Education AHIMA Approved ICD‑10 Trainer and Ambassador The ultimate goal of a physician query is to obtain clarity to physician documentation in the patient’s health record. In order to accomplish this goal,...