Falling Case Mix Have You Confused?
The ICD-10-CM/PCS code changes – effective October 1, 2018 to September 31, 2019 – could be the culprit.
Comparatively speaking, there are far less changes this year than in years past. The release includes:
- 279 new codes
- 51 deleted codes
- 143 revised codes
But don’t let the smaller amount of changes fool you. During many of our recent reviews, our findings show a big impact when it comes to case mix.
For example, Encephalopathy. Here’s how:
Case 1: Patient admitted for subtrochanteric femur fracture. The patient had operative repair of the fracture with an ORIF. Postop the patient had some confusion the provider documented “acute encephalopathy post op. Likely due to post-anesthesia.”
The coder reported the appropriate principal diagnosis and procedure code but assigned G9340, Encephalopathy unspecified, as a secondary diagnosis. Prior to October 1, 2018 unspecified encephalopathy would have been considered an MCC. The DRG would have been 480, Hip & Femur Procedures Except Major Joint W MCC, CMS weight 3.0304. Post 10/1/2018 unspecified encephalopathy is no longer considered an MCC, but toxic encephalopathy is. Documentation in the record suggests that the encephalopathy may have been caused by the anesthesia. A query to the provider to document the cause/type of the encephalopathy could impact the DRG.
- Pre 10/1/2018 – DRG 480, Hip & Femur Procedures Except Major Joint with MCC, Wt. 3.0304
- Using $5500 as the base rate $16,667.20
- Post 10/1/2018 – DRG 481, Hip & Femur Procedures Except Major Joint with CC, Wt. 2.0623
- Using $5500 as the base rate $11,342.65
- Resulting in a decrease of 0.9681 to the case weight and a reduction of $5,324.55 to reimbursement
Better documentation for the cause/type of encephalopathy could potentially support DRG 480 post 10/1/2018.
Case 2: Patient admitted for hyponatremia and encephalopathy. Documentation on the H&P stated the encephalopathy was metabolic. The coder assigned the appropriate code for hyponatremia as the principal diagnosis. The coder assigned G9340, Encephalopathy unspecified, as a secondary diagnosis.
Documentation in the H&P did support a more specific code for Encephalopathy and code G9341, Metabolic Encephalopathy, could have been reported. The more specific code for Metabolic Encephalopathy is still considered an MCC post 10/01/2018. Unspecified encephalopathy is not.
- Pre 10/1/2018 – DRG 640, Misc Disorders of Nutrition, Metabolism with MCCC, Wt. 1.1902
- Using $5500 as the base rate $6,546.10
- Post 10/1/2018 – DRG 641, Misc Disorders of Nutrition, Metabolism Without MCC, Wt. 0.7519
- Using $5500 as the base rate $4,135.45
- Resulting in a decrease of 0.4383 to the case weight and a reduction of $2,410.65 to reimbursement
Documentation in the record supported a more specific encephalopathy code. The documentation could have been better or documented more during the encounter. However, reporting the more specific code would support DRG 640 post 10/1/2018.
Educate Your Staff with HIAlearn
HIA can provide your coding staff with a comprehensive understanding of these changes via HIAlearn.
Our learning management system provides your staff with on demand access and the flexibility you need to set a training schedule that meets individual needs.
- ICD-10-PCS New Codes FY2019: This two and one half (2.5) hour session, with accompanying aptitude quiz, focuses on the additions/deletions/revisions to ICD-10-PCS, including guideline changes. This session is approved for 2 AHIMA CEUs.
- ICD-10-CM New Codes FY2019: This two and one half (2.5) hour session, with accompanying aptitude quiz, focuses on additions/deletions/revisions for ICD-10-CM for FY2018, including guideline changes. This session is approved for 3 AHIMA CEUs and/or 2.5 AAPC CEUs.
- FY2019 IPPS Changes: This approximately one and one half (1.5) hour session focuses on changes in MS-DRG assignment, reimbursement updates and MCE edits to the IPPS for FY2018. This session is approved for 1.5 AHIMA CEUs.
Our extensive Action Plan Library provides targeted and interactive sessions in an easily digestible format, including one on “Encephalopathy, Altered Mental Status, Dementia and Delirium Coding.”
The Code Hard Truth: Every Code Counts
Complete and accurate documentation + Complete and accurate coding = Complete and accurate reimbursement.
Many of our client partners have reached out to validate that their coding staff has a good understanding of the ICD-10-CM/PCS and IPPS changes with a comprehensive review.
In the past, there had been an Excludes1 note at I46.- Cardiac arrest that excluded R57.0, Cardiac shock. HIA had also received a letter from AHA on a case in the past that had stated that only I46.- Cardiac arrest would be coded if both were documented. In addition, the Third Quarter Coding Clinic page 26 had a similar case that asked if both could be coded, and AHA had instructed that only I46.9, cardiac arrest, cause unspecified would be coded if both were documented and that the CDC would be looking at possible revision to the Excludes1 note.
A higher CMI corresponds to increased consumption of resources and increased cost of patient care, resulting in increased reimbursement to the facility from government and private payers, like CMS. We know that documentation directly impacts coding.
Lately we have seen several cases where the endarterectomy was assigned along with the coronary artery bypass (CABG) procedure when being performed on the same vessel to facilitate the CABG. A coronary artery endarterectomy is not always performed during a CABG procedure, so when it is performed it becomes confusing as to whether to code it separately or not.
Assign code Z20.828, “Contact with and (suspected) exposure to other viral communicable diseases” for all patients who are tested for COVID-19 and the results are negative, regardless of symptoms, no symptoms, exposure or not as we are in a pandemic.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced new procedure codes for treatments of COVID-19 – effective as of August 1, 2020. Among the new codes are Section X New Technology codes for the introduction or infusion of therapeutics including Remdesivir, Sarilumab, Tocilizumab, transfusion of convalescent plasma, as well as introduction of any other or new therapeutic substances for the treatment of COVID-19.
One common element in many value-based programs is risk adjustment using Hierarchical Condition Categories (HCCs) to create a Risk Adjustment Factor (RAF) score. This method ranks diagnoses into categories that represent conditions with similar cost patterns.
Why are so many AKI records being denied? It’s hard to give one answer for why so many AKI records are being denied lately, but most appear to be due to the multiple sets of criteria available for use in determining if a patient has AKI, as well as physician documentation. As stated in Part 3 of this series, there are three main criteria/classifications used to diagnose AKI.
In previous parts of this series we looked at the definitions of AKI/ARF, causes, coding and sequencing, and the common clinical indicators that patients present with that are diagnosed with this condition. In Part 4, we will look at the documentation that should be present to report the diagnosis without fear of denial, as well as when a query is needed to clarify the diagnosis.
If the facility does a COVID-19 test, and test is negative, do I need a diagnosis code. The answer is yes, you will report a Z-code. The Z-code depends on the record documentation and circumstances of testing. For any patient receiving a COVID-19 test, if negative, there MUST e a Z-code to describe why the test was taken. (Test negative for COVID-19 and MD does not override negative results).
In the first parts of this series we looked at definitions of AKI/ARF, causes, coding and sequencing. In Part 3, we will look at what clinical indicators would possibly be present to support the diagnosis of AKI/ARF.
The FY2021 IPPS Proposed Rule is out and here are some highlights from it regarding ICD-10 Code proposals. We will know if these changes are permanent after the public comment period is over on July 10, 2020 and CMS prepares the Final Rule, usually out by August 1.
As discussed in Part 1 of this series, AKI/ARF is a common diagnosis that coders see daily. In Part 2, we are going to focus on the different types/specificity of AKI/ARF. We’ll learn what they mean, as well as how to code the diagnosis.
This is part 1 in a series focused on coding of acute kidney injury (AKI) and/or acute renal failure (ARF). AKI/ARF is reported often, but is also one of the most common diagnosis found in denials.
With the proliferation of COVID-19 cases, we thought we would put together a quick reference listing of some of the common scenarios that coders have asked about. As with all coding, coders should follow Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting and the COVD-19 Frequently Asked Questions document by the AHA.
Effective March 1, Medicare will pay physicians for telehealth services at the same rate as in-person visits for all diagnoses, not just services related to COVID-19. This great for providers whose patients are reluctant to visit the office.
The biggest reasons why some hospital systems are moving to single path coding is to eliminate duplicative processes and to optimize productivity. In addition, costs are reduced when only one coder “touches” the record and completes both types of coding.
Effective with 4/1/2020 discharges, ICD-10-CM code U07.0 is used to report vaping -related disorders. ICD-10-CM code U07.0 (vaping related disorder) should be used when documentation supports that the patient has a lung-related disorder from vaping. This code is found in the new ICD-10-CM Chapter 22. U07.0 will be in listed in the ICD-10-CM manual under a new section: Provisional assignment of new disease of uncertain etiology or emergency use.
The US government and public-health officials are urging consumers to utilize telemedicine for remote treatment, fill prescriptions and get medical attention during the new coronavirus pandemic. The goal is to keep people with symptoms at home and to practice social distancing if their condition doesn’t warrant more intensive hospital care.
Coronavirus: Tips for working from home. Companies around the world have told their employees to stay home and work remotely. Whether you’re a new to this concept or a work from home veteran, here’s some tips to staying productive from our #HIAfamily.
This is the final part of a three part series in which we address how coders can better interact with Clinical Documentation Improvement (CDI) professionals. In this part, we provide an actual example of an effective communication response to CDI.
This is part two of a three part series in which we address how coders can better interact with Clinical Documentation Improvement (CDI) professionals. In this part, we discuss mismatches and how to best go about resolving them. In part three we will provide a case example of best practice interaction.
This is part one of a three part series in which we address how coders can better interact with Clinical Documentation Integrity (CDI) professionals. Many times these departments are separate and the remote environment makes it difficult to interact efficiently between the two departments. In part one, we will discuss the history and objectives of CDI so the coder has a better understanding of CDI’s role.
One reason that coders should report chronic conditions (including history and status codes) on outpatient records is the HCC’s—Hierarchical Condition Categories. The quick and easy explanation of what HCC’s are is each HCC is mapped to certain ICD-10-CM codes or code ranges. HCC coding is designed to estimate future health care costs for patients.
For Part 4 of this 5-part series, we will look at Chapter 10 within ICD-10-CM—J00-J99—Diseases of the Respiratory System. There is no possible way to include every guideline or coding reference for this chapter, but here are some of the most common issues.
For Part 3 of this 5 part series, we will look at Chapter 9 within ICD-10-CM—I00-I99—Diseases of the Circulatory System. This chapter contains so many of the everyday diagnoses that we code such as hypertension, heart disease and stroke.
For Part 2 of this 5-part series, we will look at Chapter 1 within ICD-10-CM—A00-B99—Certain Infectious and Parasitic Diseases. There is no possible way to include every guideline or coding reference for this chapter, but here are some of the most common issues.
For Part 1 of this 5-part series, we will look at Chapter 21 within ICD-10-CM—Z00-Z99—Factors influencing health status and contact with health services. There is no possible way to include every guideline or coding reference for this chapter, but I’ll do my best to touch on some off the most common issues.
The HIM world has been buzzing recently with discussion of “Social Determinants of Health” and coded data. What does this mean for coders and the HIM field?
In response to the recent occurrences of vaping related disorders and in consultation with the World Health Organization (WHO) Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, the WHO Family of International Classifications (WHOFIC) Network Classification and Statistics Advisory Committee (CSAC) was convened to discuss a diagnosis code for vaping related illness for immediate use.