Part 1: Most Common DRG’s with Recommendations – DRG 871
Kim Carrier RHIT, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P
Director of Coding Quality Assurance
AHIMA Approved ICD-10-CM/PCS Trainer
HIA reviewed almost 50,000 inpatient records and over half a million codes in 2021. I’m sure that coders could guess the DRG that had the most recommendations. There are some diagnoses and DRG’s that will always be a thorn in the side for coders. We will look at the top DRG’s with recommendations and see what can be done to prevent errors going forward. I’m sure everyone guessed or new it would be sepsis that was the #1 most common DRG with recommendations.
Reviewed DRG 871: 2690
DRG recommended changes: 232
Accuracy of DRG 871: 91.38%
#1: DRG 871—Septicemia or severe sepsis w/o mechanical ventilation >96 hours with MCC
Sepsis is and will most likely always be a troubled area for coders. There are multiple reasons for this and we will look at a few of these. There are many different criteria being used to validate the diagnosis of sepsis. Denials are usually due to a payer using a specific set of criteria to validate and the physician using another. Even though coders are to use the physician’s documentation to code from, coders also must make sure that the clinical picture of the patient is also consistent with the severe diagnosis of sepsis. However, the reasons for the DRG recommendations for sepsis in our reviews were not solely based on clinical criteria. Most were due to lack of or conflicting documentation within the record.
Reasons for Sepsis DRG recommendations:
- Principal diagnosis change. Well over ¾ of the recommendations were due to change in PDX. These changes were due to the incorrect PDX being selected. It was almost an even amount that required a query and those that did not. Oftentimes, the diagnosis would be ruled out in the body of the discharge summary or in another area in the record. Some of the changes were due to lack of clinical support for sepsis. In those cases a query was recommended to clarify the diagnosis of sepsis. Afterall, sepsis is a serious condition and it is likely not going to be fully treated in just a day or two. Most cases that required a query were due to the documentation not being clear within the record. If there’s any doubt that the condition existed or was present or not, a query is necessary. There should be no question of the diagnosis when the record is finalized.
- Missed procedure codes. These were either missed mechanical ventilation codes, inaccurate mechanical ventilation time reported, or another surgery that resulted in a surgical DRG. It is imperative that coders review the mechanical ventilation notes to get the exact times the patient was on the ventilator. Also, some recommendations were due to missed procedures such as debridements and I&D’s that were in the record.
- Addition/Deletion of MCC. Some of these recommendations were asking for specificity of a secondary diagnosis that resulted in addition and/or removal of an MCC. All MCC’s should be clear of needing queries at the time of coding finalization. When denials or audits are performed, these are errors since the clarification should be sought prior to completion of coding. It’s a good idea for coders to double check any code that is “driving” the DRG.
What can coders do to improve the accuracy of reporting DRG 871?
The most important thing that a coder can do is to make sure that there are no questions that could be raised regarding any diagnosis that is used to calculate the DRG. Ask yourself these questions when coding:
- Review and verify that the diagnosis of sepsis is accurate at the time of final coding
- Look for causes of sepsis and if there is a link to a device or other complication
- Is sepsis supported? Is a query necessary to clearly document the diagnosis?
- Is the diagnosis of sepsis dropped after admission without clearly ruling out the condition? Query when necessary.
- Is the diagnosis of sepsis documented after admission without clear documentation of the condition being present on admission?
- Are there any chapter specific guidelines that should be followed?
- Was the patient on mechanical ventilation? If so, double check the hours for appropriate reporting
- Does the discharge summary contradict or conflict with the rest of the medical record documentation? When this occurs, it is often necessary to query for clarification.
- Review the medical record for any and all procedures that were performed. If there is anything in the operative note that needs to be clarified that should be completed at the time of coding. Depth of debridement is a very common reason for change based on ICD-10-PCS codes as well as specificity in hours for mechanical ventilation.
- Review the medical record for any past or current conditions and complications. If the documentation is not clear, a query may be needed.
Coders should review the entire medical record to look for any conflicting documentation and clarify this prior to final coding. Clarification prior to final coding will decrease audit recommendations and denials. Remember, denials are costly to the facility with all the time that is spent trying to appeal (see the 5 part Sepsis Series published November 2019). The E-Book on this series can be downloaded on our website here: https://www.hiacode.com/blog/resources/
ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting FY 2022
ICD-10-PCS Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting FY 2022
The information contained in this coding advice is valid at the time of posting. Viewers are encouraged to research subsequent official guidance in the areas associated with the topic as they can change rapidly.
Wow, have you seen the proposed rule for FY2023 IPPS yet? There are 1,495 proposed coding changes to ICD-10-CM diagnoses codes alone! There are also some IPPS changes to note. As for ICD-10-PCS, there are not as many new codes, most significantly occlusion of prostate artery and knee joint replacement codes.
Coding denials are sent after the auditor has reviewed the record in question and the auditor does not agree with the DRG that was paid. This can be for either a diagnosis or a procedure code that they think does not meet reporting requirements.
Introducing HIA’s Cloud-Based Audit Software, Atom Audit, Streamlining Your Coding Auditor’s Workday and Transforming Data into Action
Our new coding audit platform is an easy-to-use and intuitive coding review application, with a customizable reporting dashboard, that enables auditors to efficiently and effectively manage the entire audit lifecycle.
As of April 1, 2022 discharges, the following changes in ICD-10 and IPPS will be implemented. For years the coding community did not see changes occurring in April of the fiscal year. HIM professionals were used to not even worrying about April changes. This year, we do have some significant code additions and a change in the IPPS CC/MCC edit. The ICD10MCE and Grouper Version will be 39.1.
DRG 640 (Miscellaneous disorders of nutrition, metabolism, fluids, and electrolytes with MCC) was the number 9 most common DRG with recommendations from HIA in 2021.
DRG 981 (Extensive O.R Procedures unrelated to principal diagnosis with MCC) was the number 8 most common DRG with recommendations from HIA in 2021.
DRG 291 (Heart failure with shock with MCC). This should be no surprise to coders that DRG 291 is in the top DRG’s with recommendation. It seems to always be in the top 5 and a focus for denials.
DRG 177 (Respiratory infections and inflammations with MCC) and 178 (Respiratory infections and inflammations with CC). This should be no surprise to coders that DRG 177 is in the top DRG’s with recommendation.
During a recent review of spinal fusion cases at a client, we found coding issues on the cases in which both an anterior interbody fusion, anterior open approach was done on one day and two days later, the patient was brought back for a posterior fusion, posterior open approach. Below are some of the recommendations we made along with education explanations.
This is Part 5 of a five part series on the new 2022 CPT codes. For the remaining areas we will just briefly summarize the section. Due to the intricate nature of these sections in CPT, it is recommended that the coder read the entire section notes associated with the new codes.
This is Part 4 of a 5 part series on the new 2022 CPT codes. In this one we will explore the nervous, ocular and auditory systems CPT changes.
This is Part 3 of a 5 part series on the new 2022 CPT codes. In this one we will explore the digestive, urinary and reproductive system CPT changes.
This is Part 1 of a five part series on the new 2022 CPT codes. In this series we include examples to help the coder understand the new codes.
10 ICD-10 Codes from the Christmas movie Home Alone. T20. 10XA for Harry, Burn of first degree of head, face, and neck, unspecified site, initial encounter. T20.56XA for Kevin and his aftershave incident, Corrosion of first degree of forehead and cheek, initial encounter.
Clinical trials are research studies performed in people that are aimed at evaluating a medical, surgical, or behavioral intervention. They are the primary way that researchers find out if a new treatment, like a new drug or diet or medical device (for example, a pacemaker) is safe and effective in people.
In Part 4 of the series, we will review the NTAP procedure codes and reimbursement add-on payments. Prepare yourself as this is rather lengthy due to continuation of NTAP that would normally expire.
Coders are instructed, at this time, to follow the AHA Frequently Asked Questions Regarding ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding for COVID-19. Lately, we have seen missing PCS codes for the new technology drugs that were introduced on August 1, 2020 and thereafter.
With the creation and implementation of ICD-10-CM, multiple codes are available to describe the type of pulmonary emboli that occur.