Common ICD-10 Coding Errors Found in Audits: Part 1
The following is the first installment in a six-part coding education series from our Executive Director of Education, Patricia Maccariella-Hafey, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CIRCC. In this series, Patricia reviews common ICD-10 CM and PCS coding errors discovered in audits and how they may impact reimbursement. Part one in our series takes a closer look at Excludes 1 Notes, Diagnoses and “With” Subterms, and COPD Exacerbation with Pneumonia.
1. Excludes1 Notes
According to the CDC, if two ICD-10-CM diagnoses are not related to each other, but they exist at the same time, they may both be reported together despite an Excludes1 note.
Originally, excludes1 advice stated that two codes could never be reported together. For example, review codes I25.10 for CAD of native vessels without angina and I25.810 for CAD of bypass grafts without angina. The tabular Excludes1 note at code I25.81- excludes code I25.10 CAD of native coronary artery w/o angina. This technically means that both cannot be reported together even though a patient could potentially have both.
Excludes1 Notes – Tabular 2017; click image to enlarge
We confirmed with the AHA that coders are to code both if present.
Another point of confusion is excludes1 notes and intestinal obstruction. For example, if a patient has stage IV colon cancer with bowel obstruction, can bowel obstruction be coded as principal or secondary diagnosis?
Per the notation at K56.6-, assign only the code for the carcinoma of the colon. No code would be assigned for any associated bowel obstruction. Impacts DRG as CC.
2. Diagnoses and “With” Subterms
The word “with” should be interpreted to mean “associated with” or “due to” when it appears in a code title, the Alphabetic Index, or an instructional note in the Tabular List. The classification presumes a causal relationship between the two conditions linked by these terms in the Alphabetic Index or Tabular List.
These conditions should be coded as related even in the absence of provider documentation explicitly linking them, unless the documentation clearly states the conditions are unrelated. For conditions not specifically linked by these relational terms in the classification, provider documentation must link the conditions in order to code them as related.
Diabetes examples with:
- arthropathy NEC E11.618
- cataract E11.36
- chronic kidney disease E11.22
- circulatory complication NEC E11.59
- skin complication NEC E11.628
- HIA has written to AHA to define what the term “skin complication” should be interpreted as. For example, if a patient has cellulitis of the right foot and diabetes, should the case be linked and E11.828 be coded along with L03.115 or is the link not assumed?
Hypertension in a patient with CHF:
- I11.0, Hypertensive heart disease with heart failure
- Use additional code to identify type of heart failure (I50.-)
- I11.0, Hypertensive heart disease with heart failure
3. COPD Exacerbation with Pneumonia
Per Coding Clinic 3Q2016 page 15, assign J44.0, COPD with acute lower respiratory infection first, followed by code for pneumonia such as J18.9, Pneumonia, NOS.
This issue causes DRG assignment problems in that a patient admitted for treatment of pneumonia, will not be assigned to a pneumonia DRG if the patient has COPD.
Acute lower respiratory infection does not include “influenza” per CC3Q2016 page 16 as “influenza involves both upper and lower respiratory infection.”
- J18.9, Pneumonia as PDX
- J44.0, COPD with acute upper respiratory infection
- DRG 194, Simple pneumonia and pleurisy with CC
- Relative Weight: 0.9469
- J44.0, COPD with acute upper respiratory infection
- J18.9, Pneumonia as PDX
- J44.0, COPD with acute upper respiratory infection as PDX
- J18.9, Pneumonia (MCC)
- DRG 190, COPD with MCC
- Relative Weight: 1.1481
- What if the patient has aspiration pneumonia, J69.0 and COPD?
- Recommendation per Coding Clinic 1Q 2017 page 24 is that the note under J44.0 does NOT apply to J69.0, Aspiration pneumonia. Assign J44.9, COPD unspecified and J69.0, aspiration pneumonia. Either condition can be sequenced as principal diagnosis depending on the circumstances of admission.
- J18.9, Pneumonia (MCC)
- J44.0, COPD with acute upper respiratory infection as PDX
Keep in mind that on October 1, 2017, the “Use additional code to identify infection” note will change to “code also to identify infection” which has no sequencing guidance. So the above directives would be moot.
The information contained in this coding advice is valid at the time of posting. Readers are encouraged to research subsequent official guidance in the areas associated with the topic as they can change rapidly.
Popular Posts
Part 14: Spinal Fusion Coding — Spinal Fusion Series Summary
We have finished with the step-by-step coding tidbits on coding of spinal fusions. If you were not able to catch Parts 1-13 of this series focused on spinal fusions, please visit hiacode.com/topics/series/spinal-fusion-coding/.
Part 13: Spinal Fusion Coding — Harvesting of Autograft for Spinal Fusion
In Part 12, we focused on intra-operative peripheral neuro monitoring used during spinal fusion surgery. In Part 13, we are going to focus on harvesting of autograft and is it coded. Remember in Part 6, we learned that autograft is bone from the patient.
Part 12: Spinal Fusion Coding — Intra-Operative Peripheral Neuro Monitoring
In Part 11, we focused on identifying the computer assisted navigation used during spinal fusion surgery. In Part 12, we are going to focus on intra-operative peripheral neuro monitoring.
Part 11: Spinal Fusion Coding — Computer Assisted Navigation
In Part 10, we focused on identifying whether or not hardware from a previous spinal fusion is coded. In Part 11, we are going to discuss computer assisted navigation.
Part 10: Spinal Fusion Coding — Removing Hardware from Previous Fusion
In Part 9, we focused on identifying if decompression was also performed and if so, on which body part. In Part 10, we are going to focus on identifying if hardware was removed from a previous fusion site.
Subscribe to our weekly newsletter
Latest News
Part 14: Spinal Fusion Coding — Spinal Fusion Series Summary
We have finished with the step-by-step coding tidbits on coding of spinal fusions. If you were not able to catch Parts 1-13 of this series focused on spinal fusions, please visit hiacode.com/topics/series/spinal-fusion-coding/.
Part 13: Spinal Fusion Coding — Harvesting of Autograft for Spinal Fusion
In Part 12, we focused on intra-operative peripheral neuro monitoring used during spinal fusion surgery. In Part 13, we are going to focus on harvesting of autograft and is it coded. Remember in Part 6, we learned that autograft is bone from the patient.
Part 12: Spinal Fusion Coding — Intra-Operative Peripheral Neuro Monitoring
In Part 11, we focused on identifying the computer assisted navigation used during spinal fusion surgery. In Part 12, we are going to focus on intra-operative peripheral neuro monitoring.
Part 11: Spinal Fusion Coding — Computer Assisted Navigation
In Part 10, we focused on identifying whether or not hardware from a previous spinal fusion is coded. In Part 11, we are going to discuss computer assisted navigation.
Part 10: Spinal Fusion Coding — Removing Hardware from Previous Fusion
In Part 9, we focused on identifying if decompression was also performed and if so, on which body part. In Part 10, we are going to focus on identifying if hardware was removed from a previous fusion site.
Part 9: Spinal Fusion Coding — Was A Decompression Done During Spinal Fusion?
In Part 8, we focused on identifying if a discectomy was performed, and if so, if it was a partial or a total discectomy. In Part 9, we are going to focus on identifying if a decompression was performed, and if so, was it of the spinal cord, spinal nerves or both?
Part 8: Spinal Fusion Coding — Discectomy During Spinal Fusion
In Part 7, we focused on identifying any instrumentation that may be used during a spinal fusion. In Part 8, we are going to focus on identifying if a discectomy is performed and if this is an excision or a resection of the disc.
Part 7: Spinal Fusion Coding — Identify Any Instrumentation or Device Used
In Part 6, we focused on identifying the type of bone graft product used for the spinal fusion. In Part 7, we are going to focus on identifying any instrumentation or device used.
Part 6: Spinal Fusion Coding — Identify the Type of Bone Graft Used for Fusion
In Part 5, we focused on identifying the approach being used for the spinal fusion. In Part 6, we are going to focus on identifying the type of bone graft used for the spinal fusion.
Part 5: Spinal Fusion Coding — Identifying the Approach Being Used for Fusion
In Part 4, we focused on determining the spinal column being fused. In Part 5, we are going to focus on identifying what approach is being used to complete the spinal fusion (anterior, posterior or both).
HIA Launches Buddy Up Program for New Hires
This past year, HIA implemented “Buddy Up,” a program designed to help the new hire have a smooth transition into their new HIA roles with the assistance of a “buddy.” What is a Buddy? The Buddy is simply a peer who can guide the new hire in order to make them feel more comfortable. We are very proud of this program and have many success stories that we would like to share. Take a look at the wonderful feedback we have received below.
Part 4: Spinal Fusion Coding — Identifying the Column Being Fused
In Part 3, we focused on determining the level of the fusion(s) and how to determine the number of vertebrae fused. In Part 4, we are going to focus on identifying which column is being fused (anterior, posterior or both).
Part 3: Spinal Fusion Coding — Determine the Level(s) or Region of Fusion and Number of Vertebrae Fused
In Part 1, we learned the diagnoses associated with the need for spinal fusions, and in Part 2 the need to identify if the fusion is an initial or refusion of the vertebrae. In Part 3, we are going to focus on determining the level(s) of fusion, as well as the number of vertebrae fused.
Part 2: Spinal Fusion Coding — Initial Fusion or Refusion
In Part 2, we are going to look at the differences between initial fusion and a refusion. In ICD-9, there were specific codes to show if the fusion was an initial fusion, or if it was a refusion. In ICD-10-PCS, initial fusions and refusion procedures are coded to the same root operation “fusion.”
Part 1: Spinal Fusion Coding — Diagnoses Responsible
This is Part 1 of a 14 part series focusing on education for spinal fusions. Spinal fusion coding is a tough job for coders. There are so many diseases/disorders that result in the need for spinal fusion, and even more choices in reporting the ICD-10-PCS codes.
What’s the Best Defense? A Good Offense
The official definition from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) states that a Medicare overpayment is a payment that exceeds amounts properly payable under Medicare statutes and regulations. When Medicare identifies an overpayment, the amount becomes a debt you owe the Federal government.
Query Tip: Writing a Query Question – Simple and Concise is the Key
The question asked in a physician query may be the most important element of the document. Query questions need to be as simple and concise as possible. The physician should have no doubt what the coder is asking.
Coding Tip: Coding Complications of Transplanted Organs
Coding complications of transplanted organs has always been a coding dilemma. With the implementation of ICD-10-CM that didn’t change. However, coders have multiple directives to help in determining what a complication of the transplant is vs. non-transplant conditions and diseases.
Find Your Routine: Take Advantage of Educational Opportunities
We interviewed our most productive coders, reviewers and members of our education team, asking them what steps they take to find a rhythm that works for them. This week, we talked with Beth Martilik, MA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, Assistant Director of Education, about the steps she takes to find her routine.
Coding Tip: Atrial Fibrillation
With the implementation of ICD-10-CM came more codes for reporting many different conditions and diseases, and atrial fibrillation is one of those. For many years there was only one code available for reporting this condition, even when the physician further specified the type of atrial fibrillation that the patient had. In ICD-10-CM, there are four codes to report atrial fibrillation.
Coder Q&A with Pat Macc: Mucoid Casts and Mucus Plugs
We have a case where the physician removes mucoid casts found during bronchoscopy. We have also seen mucus plugs removed during bronchoscopy. The MD performs bronchial washings then removes a large amount of tenacious and thick mucoid casts via bronchoscopy. Is this coded drainage, extirpation or excision? What body part is used?
Query Tip: How to Be More Efficient
The key to making the query process more efficient is to look for words or documentation while reviewing the record that may signal a potential query opportunity and to note the finding at that time. By the time a coder reaches the end of a record, documentation may have been found to eliminate the need for the query.
Coder Q&A with Pat Macc: Metastatic Cancer
Question: This patient is noted to have “Lymphangitic carcinomatosis of lungs with mediastinal lymph nodes.” How would I code the diagnosis? Would I code metastatic cancer to the lung (C78.01) or metastatic cancer to the lymph nodes (C77.1)?
Coder Q&A with Pat Macc: Collapse of an Endograft
This would be considered a “mechanical” complication of the stent graft since the MD states it is a fracture of the endograft and it is folded over on itself. I would change T82.898A TO T82.598A for Other mechanical complication of other cardiac and vascular devices and implants, initial encounter. I did not use “displacement” because the surgeon did not state that the graft was displaced, only that it collapsed upon itself causing obstruction.
Find Your Routine: Be Flexible, Not Frustrated
We interviewed our most productive coders and reviewers, asking them what steps they take to find a rhythm that works for them. This week, we talked with Valerie Abney, CDIP, RHIT, CCS, about the steps she takes to find her routine.
Coding Tip: Periprosthetic Fracture Reporting and Sequencing
Osteoporosis alone is responsible for over a million fractures every year. Stress fractures are not as common but they do occur. There are more than 1 million total joint replacements in the U.S. each year, so there was a need to create codes for injuries that occur around or near the prosthesis. These are called “periprosthetic” fractures.
OIG Takes Notice of Coding Errors
Back in April, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) published a report detailing its findings from a review of two groups of high-risk diagnosis codes, acute stroke and major depressive disorder. The objective was to determine whether selected diagnosis codes submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for use in CMS’s risk adjustment program complied with Federal requirements.
Coder Q&A with Pat Macc: Coding for Newborn
There seems to be differences of opinions on the issue of a 40w0day gestation Can you clarify if P08.21 should be assigned for 40w0day infant or if it would not be assigned unless the infant’s gestation age was 40w1day or greater?
Query Tip: When to Query for Sepsis
Coders may find situations where a patient is documented as meeting SIRS or sepsis criteria, or has some clinical indicators reflective of possible sepsis, but the physician never documents sepsis as a diagnosis. Should the coder always query for sepsis in these instances?