Coding Tip: Inpatient Coding of Probable Diagnoses
This Coding Tip was updated on 12/4/2018
Kim Carrier RHIT, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P
Director of Coding Quality Assurance
AHIMA Approved ICD-10-CM/PCS Trainer
The rules about coding probable, possible and questionable diagnoses did not change with the implementation of ICD-10-CM.
A possible, probable, suspected, likely, questionable, or still to be ruled out condition can be coded if still documented as such at the time of discharge. Other similar terms used to describe possible conditions could include consistent with, compatible with, indicative of, suggestive of, and comparable with.
All the terms used above (and there could be others that would fit the definition) are terms used to describe conditions that the patient may have and that the patient is being treated or monitored for.
Per the OCG, coders can code these conditions as if they were confirmed as long as they are still documented as such at the time of discharge. Here are a couple of examples of this:
- Patient is admitted with SOB and has COPD. On admission, the patient is thought to have possible pneumonia. The patient is begun on IV antibiotics and responds to treatment. The patient is discharged with the diagnosis of COPD with acute exacerbation/acute bronchitis. There is no mention of pneumonia at the time of discharge or in the DS. In this case, the coder would need to query the MD to clarify if the possible diagnosis of pneumonia was ruled out. It may be that there is documentation in the record to elude to this and no query needed but if unclear it should be queried. The diagnosis of pneumonia would not be able to be reported unless the MD was queried and clarification of the diagnosis was given.
- Same patient as above BUT the DS does list the diagnosis of possible pneumonia as a final diagnosis. In this case, pneumonia is appropriate as a reportable diagnosis. It is a probable condition that is still being documented at discharge.
There are, however, exceptions to this rule. Here are some of the exceptions:
- Only confirmed cases of HIV/AIDS may be reported. If the diagnosis is listed with any of the terms used above and not confirmed, the disease should not be reported.
- Avian influenza, novel influenza, or other identified influenza should not be coded when they are documented as possible/probable or other terms. Only confirmed cases of Avian, novel and other identified influenza should be coded as such.
- Only confirmed cases of Zika virus can be coded.
- If there is a code for a suspected condition and the condition is listed as such, then this code would be reported instead of the code for the condition. An example would be for suspected adult and child abuse, neglect and other maltreatment. There are specific codes to report if this is suspected abuse.
Comparative/contrasting secondary diagnoses
These should be coded as if they were established in ICD-10-CM. The OCG for uncertain diagnoses should be followed. This was not the case in ICD-9 when instead of coding each of the comparative/contrasting SDX, the symptom was coded instead. Here are a couple of examples of this:
- Patient is admitted with pneumonia and during the admission complains of abdominal pain. Workup is done without confirmation of the cause of this pain. The physician documents in the record, at the time of discharge, abdominal pain was worked up with no clear cause. This was thought to be mild acute pancreatitis vs. alcoholic gastritis. In this case, both acute pancreatitis and alcoholic gastritis would be reported. No code would be reported for the symptom of abdominal pain.
- Patient is admitted with sepsis with no definitive cause. At the time of discharge, the MD documented that the sepsis was thought to be due to possible pneumonia vs. severe acute bronchitis. In this case, both pneumonia and acute bronchitis would be reported.
Comparative/contrasting principal diagnoses
This rule did not change with implementation of ICD-10-CM. If two or more contrasting/comparative diagnoses are documented at the time of discharge (and are considered as PDX) they are coded as if they were confirmed diagnoses. Sequencing would depend on the circumstances of admission. If treatment was considered equal, then either may be sequenced as the PDX.
Probable or possible malignancy
This may be the most difficult diagnosis that coders face. It is very difficult to assign a diagnosis of malignancy/cancer to a patient when this is only documented as a possible/probable or suspected condition. However, there is official coding advice that directs the coder to do just this. Even though most don’t like to do this it is what must be done. Here are a couple of examples (one PDX and one SDX):
- Patient was admitted with flank pain and workup was begun. The patient had CT scan that did show a mass in the left kidney. The patient wanted further workup as an outpatient. At the time of discharge, the physician documented the final diagnosis as kidney mass, most likely renal cell carcinoma. Workup was planned as an outpatient. In this case, the PDX should be reported as renal cell carcinoma.
- Patient was admitted with pneumonia. They had a history of lung malignancy that had been removed years ago. On this admission, patient had CT of the lung. This showed multiple lung nodules suspicious for metastasis. During the admission, the patient also complained of headache so a CT of the head was also performed. This showed multiple areas in the brain that were suspicious for metastasis. The patient refused further workup of these sites at this time. At the time of discharge, the physician documented the final diagnoses as pneumonia, history of lung cancer with possible metastasis to the lung and brain. Further workup will be discussed on follow up visit. In this case, both the lung metastasis and the brain metastasis would be reported as secondary diagnoses.
A diagnosis that is documented as “borderline” at the time of discharge is coded as a confirmed diagnosis, unless there is a specific index entry in ICD-10-CM for a borderline condition. Here are a couple of examples:
- If at the time of discharge there is a diagnosis of borderline diabetes, this is not coded as diabetes as there is a specific index entry for borderline diabetes.
- If at the time of discharge there is a diagnosis of borderline hypercholesterolemia, this would be coded as hypercholesterolemia since there is not a specific index entry for borderline hypercholesterolemia.
These are NOT the same as a possible/suspected condition or uncertain diagnosis. If it occurred, code it. If the impending or threatened condition did not occur during the admission then the coder would need to reference the Alphabetic Index to see if there is a subentry term for “impending” or “threatened” for the condition and also reference the main term entries for “impending” or “threatened”. If they are listed, then assign the code that is given. If not, then the diagnosis that is listed as impending/threatened would NOT be reported.
Concern for/concerning for
AHA Coding Clinic First Quarter 2018 confirms that the term “concern for” should be interpreted as an uncertain diagnosis and coded using the guidelines for “uncertain diagnoses” in the inpatient setting. Please disregard previous publications/emails regarding the coding of “concern for” as it has been best practice to NOT code these in the past.
ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting FY2019
Pages: 16, 18, 29, 53, 54, 83, 108, and 111
ICD-9-CM Coding Clinic, Third Quarter 2005 Page: 21
ICD-9-CM Coding Clinic, First Quarter 2006 Page: 4-5
ICD-9-CM Coding Clinic, First Quarter 2011 Page: 10
ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, Second Quarter 2016 Page: 9
ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, First Quarter 2018 Page 18-19
The information contained in this coding advice is valid at the time of posting. Viewers are encouraged to research subsequent official guidance in the areas associated with the topic as they can change rapidly.
Last week, we looked at tidbits for reporting the ICD-10-CM codes for pregnancy/obstetric records. Now we will look at some for the ICD-10-PCS reporting of these records. In reporting the appropriate ICD-10-PCS codes a coder must know what is included in the terminology of products of conception (POC).
Chances are, we all know someone affected by heart disease and stroke, because about 2,300 Americans die of cardiovascular disease each day, an average of 1 death every 38 seconds. But together we can change that.
There was a time when coding delivery records was considered simple. Many times, these types of records were given to the newer coders. However, as coding becomes more complex, this is no longer the case. With the implementation of ICD-10-CM came more codes for very detailed and specific issues that occur during pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium.
When it comes to coding and documentation, finding your own rhythm can lead to positive results. For our series, Find Your Routine, we interviewed our most productive coders and asked them what steps they take to find a rhythm that works for them. This week, we talked with Allison Curry, RHIT, CCS, Coding Specialist at Health Information Associates, about the steps she takes to find her routine.
One way to shorten a lengthy query is by avoiding repetition in the supporting documentation. Does the same diagnosis really need to be mentioned multiple times in the clinical indicators? Is it necessary to list the results of a chest x-ray twice? Does listing the same documentation multiple times give further specification or explanation to the query?
Tobacco use can lead to tobacco/nicotine dependence and serious health problems. Quitting smoking greatly reduces the risk of developing smoking-related diseases. Tobacco/nicotine dependence is a condition that often requires repeated treatments, but there are helpful treatments and resources for quitting.
This is Part 5 of a five part series on the new 2019 CPT codes. For the remaining areas we will just briefly summarize the section. Due to the intricate nature of these sections in CPT, it is recommended that the coder read the entire section notes associated with the new codes.
This is Part 4 of a five part series on the new 2019 CPT codes. In this series we will explore the CPT changes for FY 2019 and include examples to help the coder understand the new codes. There is 1 new lymphatic code, 2 new digestive system codes with 3 deletions, 3 new urinary system codes with one deletion and 7 deleted nervous system codes with 2 revisions.
This is Part 3 of a five part series on the new 2019 CPT codes. In this series we will explore the CPT changes for FY2019 and include examples to help the coder understand the new codes. There are 9 new cardiovascular CPT codes added with 2 deletions and 3 revisions.
When it comes to coding and documentation, finding your own rhythm can lead to positive results. For our series, Find Your Routine, we interviewed our most productive coders and asked them what steps they take to find a rhythm that works for them. This week, we talked with Tilina Sablan, RHIT, CCS, Coding Specialist with Health Information Associates, about the steps she takes to find her routine.
This is Part 2 of a five part series on the new 2019 CPT codes. In this series we will explore the CPT changes for FY2019 and include examples to help the coder understand the new codes. There are 4 new musculoskeletal CPT codes added with 2 deletions and 0 revisions.
This is Part 1 of a five part series on the new 2019 CPT codes. In this series we will explore the CPT changes for FY2019 and include examples to help the coder understand the new codes. There were 15 new integumentary CPT codes added with 3 deletions and 1 revision.
In part 5 of our series, we look at DRG 64—Intracranial hemorrhage or cerebral infarction with MCC. For this DRG recommendation the majority (almost all) were recommended to DRG 65 (Intracranial hemorrhage or cerebral infarction with CC) with deletion of the reported MCC.
The majority of the recommendations from DRG 190 (Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease w/MCC) was to DRG 189 (Pulmonary edema and respiratory failure) with re-sequencing of respiratory failure as the PDX or adding as a new code and sequenced as PDX.
The majority of the recommendations from DRG 853 (Infectious & parasitic disease with O.R. procedure with MCC) were to DRG 871 (Septicemia w/o MV 96+ hours with MCC) with deletion or revision of the PCS code. Some of these required physician query.
The majority of the recommendations from DRG 872 (Septicemia w/o mechanical ventilation 96+ hours w/o MCC) were to DRG 871 (Septicemia w/o mechanical ventilation 96+ hours with MCC) with the addition of an MCC to the account. Not all of these required a physician query and were present in the medical record documentation without any clarification needed prior to coding.
The majority of the recommendations from DRG 871 (Septicemia w/o MV 96+ hours with MCC) were to DRG 872 (Septicemia w/o MV 96+ hours w/o MCC) with the recommendation to delete the reported MCC or query for clarification to support the MCC that had been reported.
Every year, we make plans to live a healthier, more organized, and balanced life. For some of us, we end up falling short of those expectations. This year, to keep us on track with our New Year’s goals, we have put together a few of the most common New Year’s resolutions along with their ICD-10 diagnoses codes. Check out our tips and tricks for a healthy 2019!
Top 5 ProFee diagnosis changes found in recent HIA reviews: 1. I10 – Essential (Primary) Hypertension; 2. E11.9 – Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Without Complications; 3. K29.60 – Other Gastritis Without Bleeding; 4. R13.19 – Other Dysphagia; 5. I25.10 – Atherosclerotic Heart Disease of Native Coronary Artery Without Angina Pectoris.
What is the principal procedure? The procedure that is performed for definitive treatment or is taking care of a complication is the principal procedure. Procedures for diagnostic or exploratory purposes that are performed in addition to a procedure being performed for definitive treatment, would be reported in addition to the principal procedure.
A query question that is directive in nature, indicating what the provider should document, rather than asking for his/her professional determination of clinical facts, constitutes a leading query. The provider should not be made to feel obligated to document anything.
When I start coding a chart, I enter all account information in log and do any abstracting—disposition, admitting, and attending—take care of all of that first. ED, H&P, consult, progress reports, and discharge summary.
Some Speed Reading Tips: Once you start reading, don’t stop! Read the text straight through. If you have any question after you have completed reading the material, go back and reread the relevant sections. Reread the marked sections of the text (the items you indicated that you didn’t quite understand). Write a small summary at the beginning of the chapter – consisting about 3-4 sentences.
In HIA quality reviews we are finding that some coders are reporting Z41.2—Encounter for routine and ritual circumcision, during the male newborn birth admission, when circumcision is performed prior to discharge.
The cause/etiology of GI bleeding is not always easily determined. During procedures, to work the bleeding up, there are often multiple potential sources of bleeding found but not identified as the culprit. Many of these findings have “with” or “in” in the main or subterms.
On December 1, 2018, the HIA team based at our headquarters in Pawleys Island, South Carolina received a visit from a surprise guest – meet Otis, HIA’s very own Elf on a Shelf. Otis will be sticking around until Christmas to keep an eye on all of us. We have a feeling he may get into some trouble! Check back daily to see what Otis is up to. #OtisOnOtisDrive
When it comes to coding and documentation, finding your own rhythm can lead to positive results. For our new series, Find Your Routine, we interviewed our most productive coders and asked them what steps they take to find a rhythm that works for them. This week, we talked with Crystal Junkins, CCS, CPC, Coding Specialist with Health Information Associates, about the steps she takes to find her routine.
COPD is a respiratory condition where there is chronic obstruction to airflow in the lungs. Air is breathed into the lungs but a patient with COPD has trouble emptying air out of the lungs. This can also cause patients with COPD to have CO2 retention. COPD is an irreversible and progressive disease in which the lung function worsens as time goes on.
Tissue findings interpreted by a pathologist are not equivalent to the attending physician’s medical diagnosis based on the patient’s clinical condition. If the attending physician has not indicated the significance of an abnormal finding within a pathology report…