Coding Tip: Bullying – What is it and how is it coded?
Kim Carrier RHIT, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P
Director of Coding Quality Assurance
AHIMA Approved ICD-10-CM/PCS Trainer
Did you know that October is National Bullying Prevention Month? For FY 2019, ICD-10-CM has added terminology to Chapter 19 codes to include bullying and intimidation/intimidation through social media. When coding a record with documented bullying, this is coded as child or adult psychological abuse (initial/subsequent encounter or sequela) either as confirmed or suspected. The encounter and whether this is confirmed or suspected is needed in order to assign the appropriate diagnosis code.
T74.32XA-Child psychological abuse, confirmed, initial encounter
T74.32XD-Child psychological abuse, confirmed, subsequent encounter
T74.32XS-Child psychological abuse, confirmed, sequela
T76.32XA-Child psychological abuse, suspected, initial encounter
T76.32XD-Child psychological abuse, suspected, subsequent encounter
T76.32XS-Child psychological abuse, suspected, sequela
Z62.811-Personal history of psychological abuse in childhood (used when only a history is documented without current issue or sequela)
T74.31XA-Adult psychological abuse, confirmed, initial encounter
T74.31XD-Adult psychological abuse, confirmed, subsequent encounter
T74.31XS-Adult psychological abuse, confirmed, sequela
T76.31XA-Adult psychological abuse, suspected, initial encounter
T76.31XD-Adult psychological abuse, suspected, subsequent encounter
T76.31XS-Adult psychological abuse, suspected, sequela
Z91.411-Personel history of adult psychological abuse
What is Bullying?
Bullying is unwanted and aggressive behavior that gives someone a real or a perceived power imbalance. Most bullying occurs in the school building but it is not limited to this site. It also occurs in neighborhoods, on buses, public places and even on the Internet. Bullying can happen anywhere and to anyone as there is no single characteristic that puts someone at risk. The bully is not always stronger or bigger than those that they are bullying.
Types of Bullying:
- Verbal-this type of bullying includes teasing, threats, taunting, calling of names or inappropriate sexual comments. Saying or writing mean things about someone is considered verbal bullying.
- Social/Relational—this type of bullying is when someone hurts another’s reputation or relationships. Saying something embarrassing about someone, spreading rumors, purposely leaving someone out, telling others not to be friends with a specific person.
- Cyberbullying—this type of bullying is a little of both verbal and social. This takes place over digital devices. This means sending or sharing negative, harmful, false or mean content about another person causing embarrassment or humiliation. This can occur via texts, online apps/games, or online social media. Remember, when this happens, this can create a permanent, public record so be cautious when putting anything on social media. It can embarrass or humiliate the one that is being bullied but it will also follow the bully and can reflect poorly when trying to get hired for a job or accepted into a school.
- Physical—this type of bullying is hurting a person or their possessions. Spitting, hitting, pinching, kicking, pushing, tripping, stealing someone’s possessions or breaking them, and making mean or rude hand gestures.
Did You Know? The most common type of bullying is verbal/social bullying.
Interesting Stats on Bullying:
- 28% of U.S. students in grades 6-12 have been bullied
- 20% of U.S. students in grades 9-12 have been bullied
- 30% of the younger population admit to bullying others
- 70.6% of the younger population say they have witnessed bullying by others
- 70.4% of teachers/school staff have witnessed bullying by others
- 57% of the time bullying will stop within 10 seconds when a bystander or witness intervenes
- 9% of U.S. students in grades 6-12 have been cyberbullied
- 15% of U.S. students grades 9-12 have been cyberbullied
- 55.2% of U.S. LGBTQ students experience cyberbullying
- 43% of students notify an adult of the bullying incident
- 8 out of 10 adults (study size 320) report they have been victims of cyberbullying in the last six months (2012 study). 80% of the 320 adults reported they had felt humiliated, ignored, or were the subject of online gossip at least once a week
Who is at Risk for Bullying?
- Being overweight or underweight or different than the bully
- Wearing glasses
- Being poor and unable to dress like others
- Being new to a school or area
- People that appear weak
- People with depression, anxiety or have low self-esteem
- Not being popular or having few friends
- A person that does not generally get along with others
- A person with a disability
- A person of a different race,/ethnicity, gender, religion or sexual orientation to that of the bully
Warning Signs of Bullying:
- Injuries without explanation
- Lost/broken personal possessions
- Self-harm or talk of suicide
- Avoidance of social situations
- Drop in a student’s grades
- Feeling sick or feigning sickness
- Change in eating and sleeping habits
- Increased use of electronic devices or hides their screens
- Closing social media accounts only to open a new one
- Lack of school participation (miss, skip, or drop out)
Characteristics of Children Likely to be a Bully:
- Have a lot of friends (part of “clicks”)
- Seem overly concerned about their popularity with others
- Like to dominate or be in charge all the time
- Some may be depressed, anxious, angry or less involved in school
- Easily pressured by others and are friends with others that are bullies
- Aggressive behavior
- Easily frustrated
- Have very little parental involvement/too much time on their hands unsupervised
- Difficulty following rules
- Think violence is positive
How Can We Prevent Bullying?
- Talk about it
- Help everyone know what is considered a form of bullying
- Be a role-model and show how to treat people with kindness and respect
- Teach how to respect diversity
- Build a safe work/school/home environment
- Let ALL know the rules and policies that they are expected to follow and then ENFORCE them
- Work together and pay attention to surroundings and what is going on
- Step in when you see someone being bullied or report to another (usually will stop in 10 seconds after intervention)
We can all make a difference by talking with our children and taking an interest in what is going on around us to help reduce these percentages of bullying. We should also be mindful of reporting when documented so that these statistics can be even more accurate going forward.
ICD-10-CM Alphabetic Index and Tabular
The information contained in this coding advice is valid at the time of posting. Viewers are encouraged to research subsequent official guidance in the areas associated with the topic as they can change rapidly.
Back in April, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) published a report detailing its findings from a review of two groups of high-risk diagnosis codes, acute stroke and major depressive disorder. The objective was to determine whether selected diagnosis codes submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for use in CMS’s risk adjustment program complied with Federal requirements.
There seems to be differences of opinions on the issue of a 40w0day gestation Can you clarify if P08.21 should be assigned for 40w0day infant or if it would not be assigned unless the infant’s gestation age was 40w1day or greater?
Coders may find situations where a patient is documented as meeting SIRS or sepsis criteria, or has some clinical indicators reflective of possible sepsis, but the physician never documents sepsis as a diagnosis. Should the coder always query for sepsis in these instances?
In this example, would it be appropriate to code the complication code T82.03XA, Leakage of heart valve prosthesis, initial encounter as the principal diagnosis over the HFpEF (heart failure exacerbation) code?
We interviewed our most productive coders and reviewers, asking them what steps they take to find a rhythm that works for them. This week, we talked with Kerry Atkins, CDIP, CCS‑P, COC, CPC, CPCO, CPMA, CEMC, COBGC, RMB, Physician Services Consultant at HIA, about the steps she takes to find her routine.
A higher CMI corresponds to increased consumption of resources and increased cost of patient care, resulting in increased reimbursement to the facility from government and private payers, like CMS. We know that documentation directly impacts coding.
With the implementation of ICD-10-PCS more codes were developed in order to accurately report procedures. Spinal fusion coding is still a problematic coding issue and at times, even a coder’s nightmare. Coders often report only the code for the fusion thinking that one code would include all of the other procedures that are performed.
Answer: I would code 0HPT0NZ for removal of tissue expander from right breast, open and change 0HPT0JZ, removal of synthetic substitute from right breast, open, for removal of the acellular dermal matrix to 0HPT0KZ, Removal of nonautologous tissue substitute from right breast, open approach.
There are certain conditions that have instructional notes in the ICD-10-CM tabular/coding conventions that guide the coder in sequencing. This is especially true when the condition has a common manifestation or underlying conditions of a chronic disease. If there is a “code first” note in the tabular, the coder should follow this instruction and sequence the underlying etiology or chronic condition first followed by the manifestation as an additional diagnosis.
When it comes to coding and documentation, finding your own rhythm can lead to positive results. For our series, Find Your Routine, we interviewed our most productive coders and reviewers and asked them what steps they take to find a rhythm that works for them. This week, we talked with Meghan Schumacher, CPC, CPMA, Provider Coding Consultant at Health Information Associates, Inc., about the steps she takes to find her routine.
Last year, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) performed an investigation that found, “between 2014 and 2016, Medicare Advantage organizations overturned 75% of their preauthorization and payment denials upon appeal,” which is why, at HIA, we always advise our clients to engage in the appeals process.
There may be instances where a coder will suspect the patient has acute kidney injury (AKI), but the physician has failed to document the diagnosis. In another scenario, the physician may have made the diagnosis, but there is a question of clinical validity. In either case, a query would be justified.
Changes to CC/MCC designations included in the proposal could have a potentially dramatic effect on casemix. The presence of a major complication or comorbidity (MCC) or complication or comorbidity (CC) generally is representative of a patient that requires more resources.
How many times have you heard “it only takes one code to get the claim paid”? With the emphasis on the severity of illness and the move toward value-based reimbursement in today’s healthcare climate, it is more important than ever for coders to report all applicable diagnoses. There are three important pieces: what the provider documents, how to the coder interprets that documentation and codes it, and then how it is extrapolated.
The reimbursement landscape is already a complicated one – and the highly-complex claims denials process only adds fuel to the fire. A denied claim is one that has been determined by a payor to be in appropriate. Once a coding specialist amends the errors on a rejected claim, they can resubmit it for consideration. The time-intensive process has a significant impact on the cash flow for any setting in the healthcare environment. They are also very costly to appeal.
When a practitioner documents a diagnosis that does not appear to be supported by the clinical indicators in the health record, a coder has four choices: (1) Code the diagnosis; (2) Ignore the diagnosis; (3) Generate a query to confirm clinical validation of a diagnosis; (4) Follow the facility’s escalation policy for clinical validation.
A California-based healthcare services provider and several of its affiliates have agreed to pay $30 million to resolve allegations they submitted inaccurate information about the health status of beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare Advantage Plans, according to the Department of Justice.
Happy National Volunteer Week! This week we celebrate the impact volunteer work has on building stronger communities. We know that our staff have a positive impact while they’re on the job, and we are proud to share a few ways our #PeopleBehindTheNumbers are taking time to volunteer in their own local communities.
Scrutiny of coding compliance in the growing ambulatory surgical center (ASC) market has increased in recent years from both Medicare and private payers. This will only increase as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) moves towards value-based care.
Patients being admitted for acute renal failure due to dehydration have been happening for many, many years now. Typically what happens is a patient gets dehydrated for one reason or another. Once dehydration sets in, it can quickly start to affect many body organs. This can lead to acute renal/kidney failure/injury.
In December 2018, a Pennsylvania for-profit hospital and health system, and its CEO agreed to pay a total of $12.5 million to settle allegations they submitted false claims to Medicare and other federal health care programs for orthopedic surgeries. The settlement resolves allegations that top executives exploited a loophole – AKA modifier 59 – that allowed them to double bill federal healthcare payers for surgeries and ignored coding consultants who advised them that they were improperly billing.
When it comes to coding and documentation, finding your own rhythm can lead to positive results. For our series, Find Your Routine, we interviewed our most productive coders and asked them what steps they take to find a rhythm that works for them. This week, we talked with Zahra Ghahremani, CCS, Coding Specialist at Health Information Associates, about the steps she takes to find her routine.
All queries require at least two elements – clinical indicators and a query question. Coders can also include multiple choice options for response or leave the query open-ended for a free text response. The order in which these elements are listed in a query is open to coder or facility preference.
One area that coders struggle with is when to report a separate condition code when an already assigned combination code includes the condition. For example, if an obstetric patient is admitted and delivers, and the physician documents “obstetric patient delivered with anemia,” should both code O99.02 Anemia complicating childbirth and D64.9, Anemia, unspecified be coded or should only O99.02 be assigned?
When it comes to coding and documentation, finding your own rhythm can lead to positive results. For our series, Find Your Routine, we interviewed our most productive coders and asked them what steps they take to find a rhythm that works for them. This week, we talked with Donna Cowan, RHIT, CCS, Coding Specialist at Health Information Associates, about the steps she takes to find her routine.
The key to choosing reasonable options for a query response is to remember that the query must stand alone. Any clinical indicators supporting the options must be included in the query itself. In this week’s Query Tip, we provide examples of two queries in which the options for response are not reasonable based on clinical indicators used by coder.
Last week, we looked at tidbits for reporting the ICD-10-CM codes for pregnancy/obstetric records. Now we will look at some for the ICD-10-PCS reporting of these records. In reporting the appropriate ICD-10-PCS codes a coder must know what is included in the terminology of products of conception (POC).
Chances are, we all know someone affected by heart disease and stroke, because about 2,300 Americans die of cardiovascular disease each day, an average of 1 death every 38 seconds. But together we can change that.
There was a time when coding delivery records was considered simple. Many times, these types of records were given to the newer coders. However, as coding becomes more complex, this is no longer the case. With the implementation of ICD-10-CM came more codes for very detailed and specific issues that occur during pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium.