Coding Tip: Bullying – What is it and how is it coded?
Kim Carrier RHIT, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P
Director of Coding Quality Assurance
AHIMA Approved ICD-10-CM/PCS Trainer
Did you know that October is National Bullying Prevention Month? For FY 2019, ICD-10-CM has added terminology to Chapter 19 codes to include bullying and intimidation/intimidation through social media. When coding a record with documented bullying, this is coded as child or adult psychological abuse (initial/subsequent encounter or sequela) either as confirmed or suspected. The encounter and whether this is confirmed or suspected is needed in order to assign the appropriate diagnosis code.
T74.32XA-Child psychological abuse, confirmed, initial encounter
T74.32XD-Child psychological abuse, confirmed, subsequent encounter
T74.32XS-Child psychological abuse, confirmed, sequela
T76.32XA-Child psychological abuse, suspected, initial encounter
T76.32XD-Child psychological abuse, suspected, subsequent encounter
T76.32XS-Child psychological abuse, suspected, sequela
Z62.811-Personal history of psychological abuse in childhood (used when only a history is documented without current issue or sequela)
T74.31XA-Adult psychological abuse, confirmed, initial encounter
T74.31XD-Adult psychological abuse, confirmed, subsequent encounter
T74.31XS-Adult psychological abuse, confirmed, sequela
T76.31XA-Adult psychological abuse, suspected, initial encounter
T76.31XD-Adult psychological abuse, suspected, subsequent encounter
T76.31XS-Adult psychological abuse, suspected, sequela
Z91.411-Personel history of adult psychological abuse
What is Bullying?
Bullying is unwanted and aggressive behavior that gives someone a real or a perceived power imbalance. Most bullying occurs in the school building but it is not limited to this site. It also occurs in neighborhoods, on buses, public places and even on the Internet. Bullying can happen anywhere and to anyone as there is no single characteristic that puts someone at risk. The bully is not always stronger or bigger than those that they are bullying.
Types of Bullying:
- Verbal-this type of bullying includes teasing, threats, taunting, calling of names or inappropriate sexual comments. Saying or writing mean things about someone is considered verbal bullying.
- Social/Relational—this type of bullying is when someone hurts another’s reputation or relationships. Saying something embarrassing about someone, spreading rumors, purposely leaving someone out, telling others not to be friends with a specific person.
- Cyberbullying—this type of bullying is a little of both verbal and social. This takes place over digital devices. This means sending or sharing negative, harmful, false or mean content about another person causing embarrassment or humiliation. This can occur via texts, online apps/games, or online social media. Remember, when this happens, this can create a permanent, public record so be cautious when putting anything on social media. It can embarrass or humiliate the one that is being bullied but it will also follow the bully and can reflect poorly when trying to get hired for a job or accepted into a school.
- Physical—this type of bullying is hurting a person or their possessions. Spitting, hitting, pinching, kicking, pushing, tripping, stealing someone’s possessions or breaking them, and making mean or rude hand gestures.
Did You Know? The most common type of bullying is verbal/social bullying.
Interesting Stats on Bullying:
- 28% of U.S. students in grades 6-12 have been bullied
- 20% of U.S. students in grades 9-12 have been bullied
- 30% of the younger population admit to bullying others
- 70.6% of the younger population say they have witnessed bullying by others
- 70.4% of teachers/school staff have witnessed bullying by others
- 57% of the time bullying will stop within 10 seconds when a bystander or witness intervenes
- 9% of U.S. students in grades 6-12 have been cyberbullied
- 15% of U.S. students grades 9-12 have been cyberbullied
- 55.2% of U.S. LGBTQ students experience cyberbullying
- 43% of students notify an adult of the bullying incident
- 8 out of 10 adults (study size 320) report they have been victims of cyberbullying in the last six months (2012 study). 80% of the 320 adults reported they had felt humiliated, ignored, or were the subject of online gossip at least once a week
Who is at Risk for Bullying?
- Being overweight or underweight or different than the bully
- Wearing glasses
- Being poor and unable to dress like others
- Being new to a school or area
- People that appear weak
- People with depression, anxiety or have low self-esteem
- Not being popular or having few friends
- A person that does not generally get along with others
- A person with a disability
- A person of a different race,/ethnicity, gender, religion or sexual orientation to that of the bully
Warning Signs of Bullying:
- Injuries without explanation
- Lost/broken personal possessions
- Self-harm or talk of suicide
- Avoidance of social situations
- Drop in a student’s grades
- Feeling sick or feigning sickness
- Change in eating and sleeping habits
- Increased use of electronic devices or hides their screens
- Closing social media accounts only to open a new one
- Lack of school participation (miss, skip, or drop out)
Characteristics of Children Likely to be a Bully:
- Have a lot of friends (part of “clicks”)
- Seem overly concerned about their popularity with others
- Like to dominate or be in charge all the time
- Some may be depressed, anxious, angry or less involved in school
- Easily pressured by others and are friends with others that are bullies
- Aggressive behavior
- Easily frustrated
- Have very little parental involvement/too much time on their hands unsupervised
- Difficulty following rules
- Think violence is positive
How Can We Prevent Bullying?
- Talk about it
- Help everyone know what is considered a form of bullying
- Be a role-model and show how to treat people with kindness and respect
- Teach how to respect diversity
- Build a safe work/school/home environment
- Let ALL know the rules and policies that they are expected to follow and then ENFORCE them
- Work together and pay attention to surroundings and what is going on
- Step in when you see someone being bullied or report to another (usually will stop in 10 seconds after intervention)
We can all make a difference by talking with our children and taking an interest in what is going on around us to help reduce these percentages of bullying. We should also be mindful of reporting when documented so that these statistics can be even more accurate going forward.
ICD-10-CM Alphabetic Index and Tabular
The information contained in this coding advice is valid at the time of posting. Viewers are encouraged to research subsequent official guidance in the areas associated with the topic as they can change rapidly.
When it comes to coding and documentation, finding your own rhythm can lead to positive results. For our new series, Find Your Routine, we interviewed our most productive coders and asked them what steps they take to find a rhythm that works for them. This week, we talked with Crystal Junkins, CCS, CPC, Coding Specialist with Health Information Associates, about the steps she takes to find her routine.
In 2003, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) implemented Risk Adjustment Factors (RAF) and Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) coding to identify individuals with serious and/or chronic illnesses and assign them a risk factor score that is based on a combination of demographic information and reported diagnoses.
The ICD-10-CM/PCS code changes – effective October 1, 2018 to September 31, 2019 – could be the culprit. Comparatively speaking, there are far less changes this year than in years past. The release includes: 279 new codes, 51 deleted codes,143 revised codes. But don’t let the smaller amount of changes fool you…
With the publication of the new ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting for FY 2019, we finally have an answer regarding reporting of BMI in pregnancy. The new guideline does state “do not assign BMI codes during pregnancy.”
Conflicting documentation occurs when health care providers call the same condition different things. When none of the documented conditions are clearly ruled out by the physician, coders may find it necessary to query for the most appropriate diagnosis.
In reviewing hundreds of contracts, the OIG found that insurers overturned 75% of their own denials upon appeal—approximately 216,000 denials each year. However, while the odds of winning an appeal are seemingly good, many providers simply don’t have the time or the internal staff and infrastructure needed to engage in the process.
It’s Halloween season! It’s time to overindulge on candy, fight over the best costume, become irrationally scared of things like the number 13, and have nightmares of your 6th birthday with that terrifying clown. As for us, we’re getting in the spirit with 13 spooky ICD- 10 codes! Beware – it’s scary out there.
Section “X” is a separate place within ICD-10-PCS for certain new technology procedures (such as new technology drugs). Section “X” does not introduce any new coding concepts or unusual guidelines for correct coding and maintains continuity with the other sections in ICD-10-PCS.
Coding Tip: New ICD-10-CM General Coding Guideline — Coding for Healthcare Encounters in Hurricane Aftermath
With the Hurricane season in full swing, this new guideline will be helpful in reporting the external cause codes when an injury occurs as a result of the hurricane, and also help in determining sequencing of the reported codes.
The refined Stroke 30-day mortality measure (MORT-30-STK) is a statistic defined as death occurring within 30 days of a diagnosed stroke. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) publicly reports a 30-day hospital-level stroke mortality measure on Hospital Compare as part of the Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) program.
“Lobar” pneumonia references a form of pneumonia that affects a specific lobe or lobes of the lung. This is a bacterial pneumonia and is most commonly community acquired. Antibiotics are almost always necessary to clear this type of pneumonia.
We have seen a lot of recommendations of late where the coders are coding hydronephrosis, UTI and ureteral stone separately or not with the correct code to include all conditions.
Coders have struggled for some time with the dilemma of when to assign the combination code of carotid stenosis, with cerebral infarction (i.e.I63.231) and when to assign separate codes for the specific cerebral infarction and carotid stenosis. (i.e. I66.01 and I65.21).
Queries in a Yes/No format are limited to use in the four specific circumstances. This format may not be used when only clinical indicators of a condition are present, but the diagnosis has not been documented in the health record.
Queries written in a multiple-choice format include a short list of options for physician response. These options must be relevant and supported by the clinical indicators included in the query.
Since the implementation of ICD-10-PCS in 2015, yearly changes have been made regarding the definition of, and guidelines associated with, the root operation Control. This has caused coding professionals much confusion in determining whether to assign a procedure to root operation Control, to assign another root operation, or to not assign a procedure code at all.
The policies in the IPPS/LTCH PPS final rule further advance the agency’s priority of creating a patient-centered healthcare system by achieving greater price transparency, interoperability, and significant burden reduction so that hospitals can operate with better…
In this current, ever-changing healthcare climate, health systems face many challenges. Facilities large and small must be dedicated to improving documentation and reducing complications, HACs, infection rates, and readmissions as they endeavor towards value-based care. Coding inaccuracies can really undermine…
It’s imperative, in today’s challenging healthcare environment, that organizations demand complete and accurate coding practices from their vendors if they want: Appropriate and timely reimbursement; Representative quality measures; Improved CMI; Reduction in payor denials and; Mitigation of compliance risks.
In addition to positive clinical indicators documented at the time of admission, any of these that occur within the few days after admission should also be included. This will support the fact that sepsis could have developed after admission. It is important that a POA query give equal attention to what supports POA yes, as well as POA no to avoid the appearance of a leading query.
This major proposed rule addresses changes to the Medicare physician fee schedule (PFS) and other Medicare Part B payment policies to ensure that our payment systems are updated to reflect changes in medical practice and the relative value of services, as well as changes in the statute.
For example, open the ICD-11 online link and click on “Browse the release version.” Then choose “Coding Tool” tab at the top. We chose “sepsis.” Sepsis without shock is coded to 1G40. Sepsis with septic shock is coded 1G41. A bit different than ICD-10!
On June 18, 2018, the World Health Organization (WHO) released a preview of its new International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). ICD-11 will be formally presented at the World Health Assembly on May 2019 for adoption by Member States, and will come into effect the 1st of January 2022. The advanced preview will allow countries to plan how to use the new version to prepare translations and train health professionals.
From a coding perspective, the IABP is not classified as a device such as the VAD’s. The IABP is not coded as a device within ICD-10-PCS and is coded with the root operation of “Assistance.” The ICD-10-PCS code for insertion of an IABP for continuous pumping would be 5A02210, Extracorporeal or Systemic Assistance, Physiologic Systems, Assistance, Cardiac, Continuous, Output, Balloon Pump.
The key to a quality physician query is the question. The question provides direction for the choice of clinical indicators and options for response. So why do so many coders have trouble writing the question? My theory is that coders overthink the question rather than keeping it simple and to the point. The best way to get a physician to answer a query is with a question that makes sense and eliminates guessing as to what is being asked.
Locating ventilator times were difficult in the paper medical record, but has not become any easier with the implementation on the electronic health record (EHR.) Coders should be encouraged to review the record for exact ventilator times. As mentioned above, this could come down to minutes when selecting the correct ICD-10-PCS code.
Hamilton. If you haven’t seen it, you’ve heard of it. The Broadway mega-hit has been the toughest ticket on Broadway since its debut in 2015. For the uninitiated, Hamilton explores the life and triumphs of the previously obscure “ten-dollar founding father,” Alexander Hamilton, through rap, hip-hop, and musical theatre.
Procedure code assignment for excisional debridement has always been a focus area in coding audits. The biggest concern is whether or not the debridement is truly excisional in nature, and if the documentation truly supports an excisional debridement. HIA has written a previous Coding Tip on determining nonexcisional vs excisional debridement.