Coding Tip: Coding Complications of Transplanted Organs
Kim Carrier RHIT, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P
Director of Coding Quality Assurance
AHIMA Approved ICD-10-CM/PCS Trainer
Coding complications of transplanted organs has always been a coding dilemma. With the implementation of ICD-10-CM that didn’t change. However, coders have multiple directives to help in determining what a complication of the transplant is vs. non-transplant conditions and diseases. Documentation does not typically state that a condition is a complication of the transplant, and it is up to the coder to know which conditions would be considered complications. Coders are no longer only assigning codes to terms that they read in a patient record. They also have to know the function of the organs, and the disease processes. To me, the first thing I think of is, “was the function of the transplanted organ affected?” There’s no way to list out every scenario that a coder will see, but let’s look at the most common organ transplants with complications that coders see:
Was the function of the transplanted organ affected?
- Patient with pneumonia (infectious, viral, aspiration or other) and the is status post lung transplant. If the pneumonia is in the lung that was transplanted then YES this is coded as a complication of the transplanted organ. If, however, the patient happens to have pneumonia in the native lung (maybe only one lung was transplanted) then this is not a complication of the transplant. The reason for this is that the function of the specific organ must be affected. The latest Coding Clinic for ICD-10-CM/PCS, Second Quarter 2019 does give examples of this on page 6.
- Patient presents with acute renal failure due to dehydration or other condition and is status post kidney transplant. Anytime a patient has acute renal failure, the function of the transplanted kidney is affected. This can also be found in the latest Coding Clinic as cited above.
- Patient is status post liver transplant years ago and blood work showed elevated LFT’s, and the biopsy showed hepatitis. Any transplanted liver complication/disease is coded to a complication of the transplanted organ. Remember, status codes are only used when there is no disease or complication of the organs.
- Patient presents with shortness of breath and is diagnosed with acute diastolic heart failure. The patient had a heart transplant about two years ago. Even though the heart failure developed long after the transplant of the heart, this is coded as a complication of the transplant. This disease/illness affected the function of the transplanted heart. There are no timeframe restriction on complications of a transplanted organ.
- Patient presents with sepsis due to pyelonephritis and is also s/p bilateral lung transplant just a few months earlier. This would NOT be considered a complication of the lung transplant since the infection is in the urinary system. This condition may complicate the treatment given for the lung transplant, but if there is no affect in the function of the transplanted lung it is not coded as a complication.
- Patient presents status post left kidney transplant. There is still documented chronic kidney disease (CKD) due to the patient only having one functioning kidney. This would NOT be coded as a complication of the transplanted kidney unless the physician states that there is a complication of the transplant. Query may be needed on these if the documentation is unclear. If the patient has progressed to end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis again, this would be coded as a complication since the function of the transplanted kidney is affected (the need for dialysis).
Here are a few tips on coding transplant complications:
- A transplant complication is only coded if the function of the transplanted organ is affected
- Patients may still have some form of CKD even after transplant
- Malignancy of a transplanted organ should be coded as a transplant complication followed by the code C80.2, Malignant neoplasm associated with transplanted organ. An additional code for the specific malignancy should also be reported.
- Coronary atherosclerosis of a transplanted heart is not coded as a transplant complication
- Pneumonia that is specified to be of the transplanted lung is a complication since this affects the function of the lung
- Patients that present with acute kidney failure and also have a kidney transplant would be coded as a complication since the function of the kidney is affected
- Congestive heart failure in a patient that is status post heart transplant is coded as a complication of the transplanted organ
- Hepatitis in a patient that is status post liver transplant is coded as a complication of the transplanted organ
- An injury that is not related to the transplant (such as fracture of femur) would not be coded as a transplant complication
- There are no timeframe restrictions on when a complication may occur
If documentation is not clear, a query may be needed to clarify if the transplanted organ function is affected, especially when there are bilateral organs and only one is transplanted. As you can see in the references listed below, both ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM are very similar in advice regarding the coding of transplant complications, with the only differences really being the actual codes reported. The logic didn’t change.
ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting 2019
Coding Clinic, Fourth Quarter 2008 Page: 82
Coding Clinic, Third Quarter 2003 Page: 17
Coding Clinic, Fourth Quarter 2003 Page 60
Coding Clinic, Third Quarter 1998 Pages: 3-9
Coding Clinic, First Quarter 1989 Pages: 5 & 10
Coding Clinic for ICD10-CM/PCS, Second Quarter 2019 Page: 6
Coding Clinic, First Quarter 2013 Page: 24
Coding Clinic, Second Quarter 1994 Page: 9
Coding Clinic, Third Quarter 1994 Page: 8
The information contained in this coding advice is valid at the time of posting. Viewers are encouraged to research subsequent official guidance in the areas associated with the topic as they can change rapidly.
In Parts 1, 2 and 3 we learned about what sepsis is, sequencing of sepsis and what documentation is needed to report severe sepsis. In Part 4, we will look at clinical indicators needed to clinically support the diagnosis of sepsis and determine if a query is indicated.
Severe sepsis occurs when sepsis progresses and signs of organ dysfunction/failure develop. One site stated that approximately 30% of patients with severe sepsis do not survive. Patients may develop one organ dysfunction/failure, multi-system organ failure and/or septic shock.
In Part 2 of our Sepsis Series, we are going to focus on sequencing of sepsis when the diagnosis is clearly documented. Later in the series we will look at what to do when the diagnosis is not clearly documented.
In this series, we will learn what sepsis is or causes of sepsis, how to sequence the diagnosis in ICD-10-CM, what are the clinical indicators for sepsis, is a query necessary before reporting the diagnosis of sepsis, and how to prevent denials on sepsis records.
In the previous three parts of this four part series, we discussed the new ICD-10-CM diagnosis code changes, ICD-10-PCS procedure code changes and FY2020 IPPS changes. In this last Part 4 of the series, we will review the NTAP procedure codes and reimbursement add-on payments for FY2020.
In the previous two parts of this four part series, we discussed the new ICD-10-CM diagnosis code changes and ICD-10-PC procedure code changes. In this session we will review the major IPPS changes for FY2020. On August 2, 2019, CMS published the Final Rule for IPPS (CMS-1716) FY2020 IPPS Final Rule.
In Part 1 of this 4 part series we discussed some of the new ICD-10-CM diagnosis changes. In Part 2 we present the significant ICD-10-PCS procedure code changes. There are 72,184 total ICD-10-CM codes for FY2020.
This is Part 1 of a 4 part series on the FY2020 changes to ICD-10 and the IPPS. In this part, we discuss some of the new ICD-10-CM diagnosis changes. There are 72,184 total ICD-10-CM codes for FY2020.
We have finished with the step-by-step coding tidbits on coding of spinal fusions. If you were not able to catch Parts 1-13 of this series focused on spinal fusions, please visit hiacode.com/topics/series/spinal-fusion-coding/.
In Part 12, we focused on intra-operative peripheral neuro monitoring used during spinal fusion surgery. In Part 13, we are going to focus on harvesting of autograft and is it coded. Remember in Part 6, we learned that autograft is bone from the patient.
In Part 11, we focused on identifying the computer assisted navigation used during spinal fusion surgery. In Part 12, we are going to focus on intra-operative peripheral neuro monitoring.
In Part 10, we focused on identifying whether or not hardware from a previous spinal fusion is coded. In Part 11, we are going to discuss computer assisted navigation.
In Part 9, we focused on identifying if decompression was also performed and if so, on which body part. In Part 10, we are going to focus on identifying if hardware was removed from a previous fusion site.
In Part 8, we focused on identifying if a discectomy was performed, and if so, if it was a partial or a total discectomy. In Part 9, we are going to focus on identifying if a decompression was performed, and if so, was it of the spinal cord, spinal nerves or both?
In Part 7, we focused on identifying any instrumentation that may be used during a spinal fusion. In Part 8, we are going to focus on identifying if a discectomy is performed and if this is an excision or a resection of the disc.
In Part 6, we focused on identifying the type of bone graft product used for the spinal fusion. In Part 7, we are going to focus on identifying any instrumentation or device used.
In Part 5, we focused on identifying the approach being used for the spinal fusion. In Part 6, we are going to focus on identifying the type of bone graft used for the spinal fusion.
In Part 4, we focused on determining the spinal column being fused. In Part 5, we are going to focus on identifying what approach is being used to complete the spinal fusion (anterior, posterior or both).
This past year, HIA implemented “Buddy Up,” a program designed to help the new hire have a smooth transition into their new HIA roles with the assistance of a “buddy.” What is a Buddy? The Buddy is simply a peer who can guide the new hire in order to make them feel more comfortable. We are very proud of this program and have many success stories that we would like to share. Take a look at the wonderful feedback we have received below.
In Part 3, we focused on determining the level of the fusion(s) and how to determine the number of vertebrae fused. In Part 4, we are going to focus on identifying which column is being fused (anterior, posterior or both).
Part 3: Spinal Fusion Coding — Determine the Level(s) or Region of Fusion and Number of Vertebrae Fused
In Part 1, we learned the diagnoses associated with the need for spinal fusions, and in Part 2 the need to identify if the fusion is an initial or refusion of the vertebrae. In Part 3, we are going to focus on determining the level(s) of fusion, as well as the number of vertebrae fused.
In Part 2, we are going to look at the differences between initial fusion and a refusion. In ICD-9, there were specific codes to show if the fusion was an initial fusion, or if it was a refusion. In ICD-10-PCS, initial fusions and refusion procedures are coded to the same root operation “fusion.”
This is Part 1 of a 14 part series focusing on education for spinal fusions. Spinal fusion coding is a tough job for coders. There are so many diseases/disorders that result in the need for spinal fusion, and even more choices in reporting the ICD-10-PCS codes.
The question asked in a physician query may be the most important element of the document. Query questions need to be as simple and concise as possible. The physician should have no doubt what the coder is asking.
We interviewed our most productive coders, reviewers and members of our education team, asking them what steps they take to find a rhythm that works for them. This week, we talked with Beth Martilik, MA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, Assistant Director of Education, about the steps she takes to find her routine.
With the implementation of ICD-10-CM came more codes for reporting many different conditions and diseases, and atrial fibrillation is one of those. For many years there was only one code available for reporting this condition, even when the physician further specified the type of atrial fibrillation that the patient had. In ICD-10-CM, there are four codes to report atrial fibrillation.
We have a case where the physician removes mucoid casts found during bronchoscopy. We have also seen mucus plugs removed during bronchoscopy. The MD performs bronchial washings then removes a large amount of tenacious and thick mucoid casts via bronchoscopy. Is this coded drainage, extirpation or excision? What body part is used?
The key to making the query process more efficient is to look for words or documentation while reviewing the record that may signal a potential query opportunity and to note the finding at that time. By the time a coder reaches the end of a record, documentation may have been found to eliminate the need for the query.
Question: This patient is noted to have “Lymphangitic carcinomatosis of lungs with mediastinal lymph nodes.” How would I code the diagnosis? Would I code metastatic cancer to the lung (C78.01) or metastatic cancer to the lymph nodes (C77.1)?