Coding Tip: “Code First” Instructional Notes in ICD-10-CM
Kim Carrier RHIT, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P
Director of Coding Quality Assurance
AHIMA Approved ICD-10-CM/PCS Trainer
Instructional notes within ICD-10-CM are not new. Coders have been following these for years now but HIA is seeing denials and making recommendations due to not following the instruction “code first”.
What does “code first” mean?
There are certain conditions that have instructional notes in the ICD-10-CM tabular/coding conventions that guide the coder in sequencing. This is especially true when the condition has a common manifestation or underlying conditions of a chronic disease. If there is a “code first” note in the tabular, the coder should follow this instruction and sequence the underlying etiology or chronic condition first followed by the manifestation as an additional diagnosis. There will be a “use additional code” note at the etiology/underlying condition.
Another thing to look for is in the code title of specific diagnoses “in diseases classified elsewhere”. This part of the title is telling the coder that this is a manifestation code and is never permitted to be sequenced as the PDX or first listed code. When coders see a code in brackets this indicates that this code should not be sequenced first.
Most Common Examples of Incorrect Sequencing:
- Patient presents for drainage of pleural effusion that is documented to be malignant secondary to lung cancer. The patient has thoracentesis and is discharged home. In this case, the PDX/first listed code will be the lung cancer followed by the code for the malignant pleural effusion. In the ICD-10-CM tabular, the coder will see notes under the Category J91.0 to code first the underlying neoplasm. Coders will see the same “code first” instruction when looking at malignant ascites.
- Patient present with anemia and is admitted for transfusion. The anemia is documented to be due to end stage renal disease (ESRD) after workup and consultation with hematology. The patient is discharged to follow up and to continue their outpatient hemodialysis (MWF). In this case, the PDX/first listed code will be the ESRD and not the anemia. Even though the anemia is the condition treated and focus of the admission there are instructional notes in ICD-10-CM tabular instructing the coder to “code first” the underlying chronic kidney disease.
- Patient is admitted with acute on chronic systolic congestive heart failure (CHF) and the diagnosis of hypertension. ICD-10-CM assumes a causal relationship and this is coded as hypertensive heart disease with CHF and an additional code for the specific type of heart failure. In this case, the PDX of hypertensive heart disease with CHF (I11.0) is reported as the PDX followed by the code for the heart failure (I50.9) Under the Category I50 in the ICD-10-CM tabular there are instructional notes for the coder to “code first” if due to hypertension. There are multiple “code first” instructions under this category.
- Patient presents with confusion/altered mental status that is more than the normal for them. There is a history of Parkinson’s disease with dementia. Workup revealed that the patient’s Parkinson’s disease was progressing quickly and their medications were altered. The patient was observed with 1:1 sitter without much improvement. It is recommended that the patient be admitted to a nursing home that focuses on dementia patients. In this case, the diagnosis code for the Parkinson’s disease (Dementia with Lewy bodies) is reported as the PDX followed by a code for the dementia in other diseases as an additional SDX.
- Patient presents with chest pain and has cardiac catheterization during their hospitalization. The cardiac catheterizations showed that the patient had multi-vessel coronary atherosclerosis of the native vessels with occlusion in one, as well as atherosclerosis due to calcified coronary and lipid rich plaque. In this case, the code for the atherosclerotic heart disease of the native coronary artery is sequenced as the PDX. The calcified coronary and the lipid rich plaque atherosclerosis would be reported as SDX due to the “code first” instructional note in ICD-10-CM.
Coders should always review and follow the chapter specific guidance and the ICD-10-CM tabular when coding to ensure that the appropriate PDX is selected. It’s not always so black and white when the focus of the admission is towards the manifestation and not the condition causing it. This sequencing advice should only be followed when there is a coding guideline or instructional notes in ICD-10-CM. It will not always be the underlying condition reported as the PDX. The best examples of this that I can think of is anemia due to acute gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and acute respiratory failure due to pneumonia/COPD exacerbation. In these cases, the PDX will depend on the focus of admission as there are no “code first” instructional notes to follow.
ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting FY 2019 Pages: 11-12, 15, and 52
ICD-10-CM Alphabetic Index and Tabular
ICD-10-CM/PCS, Coding Clinic, First Quarter ICD-10 2017 Pages: 43-44
ICD-10-CM/PCS, Coding Clinic, First Quarter ICD-10 2016 Pages: 39-40
ICD-10-CM/PCS, Coding Clinic, Fourth Quarter ICD-10 2016 Pages: 118-119
ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic, Fourth Quarter ICD-10 2016 Page: 141
ICD-9-CM Coding Clinic, Fourth Quarter 2011 Page: 107
ICD-9-CM Coding Clinic, Fourth Quarter 2008 Pages: 113-114
The information contained in this coding advice is valid at the time of posting. Viewers are encouraged to research subsequent official guidance in the areas associated with the topic as they can change rapidly.
The question asked in a physician query may be the most important element of the document. Query questions need to be as simple and concise as possible. The physician should have no doubt what the coder is asking.
Coding complications of transplanted organs has always been a coding dilemma. With the implementation of ICD-10-CM that didn’t change. However, coders have multiple directives to help in determining what a complication of the transplant is vs. non-transplant conditions and diseases.
We interviewed our most productive coders, reviewers and members of our education team, asking them what steps they take to find a rhythm that works for them. This week, we talked with Beth Martilik, MA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, Assistant Director of Education, about the steps she takes to find her routine.
With the implementation of ICD-10-CM came more codes for reporting many different conditions and diseases, and atrial fibrillation is one of those. For many years there was only one code available for reporting this condition, even when the physician further specified the type of atrial fibrillation that the patient had. In ICD-10-CM, there are four codes to report atrial fibrillation.
We have a case where the physician removes mucoid casts found during bronchoscopy. We have also seen mucus plugs removed during bronchoscopy. The MD performs bronchial washings then removes a large amount of tenacious and thick mucoid casts via bronchoscopy. Is this coded drainage, extirpation or excision? What body part is used?
The key to making the query process more efficient is to look for words or documentation while reviewing the record that may signal a potential query opportunity and to note the finding at that time. By the time a coder reaches the end of a record, documentation may have been found to eliminate the need for the query.
Question: This patient is noted to have “Lymphangitic carcinomatosis of lungs with mediastinal lymph nodes.” How would I code the diagnosis? Would I code metastatic cancer to the lung (C78.01) or metastatic cancer to the lymph nodes (C77.1)?
Coding these can be challenging for coders when trying to decipher the operative notes and terms that are used. The physicians are still using the terms excision and resection interchangeably and review of the entire operative note is required to select the appropriate root operation. Remember, it is the coder’s responsibility to determine the root operation based on the details from the physician in the operative report.
This would be considered a “mechanical” complication of the stent graft since the MD states it is a fracture of the endograft and it is folded over on itself. I would change T82.898A TO T82.598A for Other mechanical complication of other cardiac and vascular devices and implants, initial encounter. I did not use “displacement” because the surgeon did not state that the graft was displaced, only that it collapsed upon itself causing obstruction.
We interviewed our most productive coders and reviewers, asking them what steps they take to find a rhythm that works for them. This week, we talked with Valerie Abney, CDIP, RHIT, CCS, about the steps she takes to find her routine.
Osteoporosis alone is responsible for over a million fractures every year. Stress fractures are not as common but they do occur. There are more than 1 million total joint replacements in the U.S. each year, so there was a need to create codes for injuries that occur around or near the prosthesis. These are called “periprosthetic” fractures.
Back in April, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) published a report detailing its findings from a review of two groups of high-risk diagnosis codes, acute stroke and major depressive disorder. The objective was to determine whether selected diagnosis codes submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for use in CMS’s risk adjustment program complied with Federal requirements.
There seems to be differences of opinions on the issue of a 40w0day gestation Can you clarify if P08.21 should be assigned for 40w0day infant or if it would not be assigned unless the infant’s gestation age was 40w1day or greater?
Coders may find situations where a patient is documented as meeting SIRS or sepsis criteria, or has some clinical indicators reflective of possible sepsis, but the physician never documents sepsis as a diagnosis. Should the coder always query for sepsis in these instances?
In this example, would it be appropriate to code the complication code T82.03XA, Leakage of heart valve prosthesis, initial encounter as the principal diagnosis over the HFpEF (heart failure exacerbation) code?
We interviewed our most productive coders and reviewers, asking them what steps they take to find a rhythm that works for them. This week, we talked with Kerry Atkins, CDIP, CCS‑P, COC, CPC, CPCO, CPMA, CEMC, COBGC, RMB, Physician Services Consultant at HIA, about the steps she takes to find her routine.
A higher CMI corresponds to increased consumption of resources and increased cost of patient care, resulting in increased reimbursement to the facility from government and private payers, like CMS. We know that documentation directly impacts coding.
With the implementation of ICD-10-PCS more codes were developed in order to accurately report procedures. Spinal fusion coding is still a problematic coding issue and at times, even a coder’s nightmare. Coders often report only the code for the fusion thinking that one code would include all of the other procedures that are performed.
Answer: I would code 0HPT0NZ for removal of tissue expander from right breast, open and change 0HPT0JZ, removal of synthetic substitute from right breast, open, for removal of the acellular dermal matrix to 0HPT0KZ, Removal of nonautologous tissue substitute from right breast, open approach.
When it comes to coding and documentation, finding your own rhythm can lead to positive results. For our series, Find Your Routine, we interviewed our most productive coders and reviewers and asked them what steps they take to find a rhythm that works for them. This week, we talked with Meghan Schumacher, CPC, CPMA, Provider Coding Consultant at Health Information Associates, Inc., about the steps she takes to find her routine.
Last year, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) performed an investigation that found, “between 2014 and 2016, Medicare Advantage organizations overturned 75% of their preauthorization and payment denials upon appeal,” which is why, at HIA, we always advise our clients to engage in the appeals process.
There may be instances where a coder will suspect the patient has acute kidney injury (AKI), but the physician has failed to document the diagnosis. In another scenario, the physician may have made the diagnosis, but there is a question of clinical validity. In either case, a query would be justified.
Changes to CC/MCC designations included in the proposal could have a potentially dramatic effect on casemix. The presence of a major complication or comorbidity (MCC) or complication or comorbidity (CC) generally is representative of a patient that requires more resources.
The reimbursement landscape is already a complicated one – and the highly-complex claims denials process only adds fuel to the fire. A denied claim is one that has been determined by a payor to be in appropriate. Once a coding specialist amends the errors on a rejected claim, they can resubmit it for consideration. The time-intensive process has a significant impact on the cash flow for any setting in the healthcare environment. They are also very costly to appeal.
When a practitioner documents a diagnosis that does not appear to be supported by the clinical indicators in the health record, a coder has four choices: (1) Code the diagnosis; (2) Ignore the diagnosis; (3) Generate a query to confirm clinical validation of a diagnosis; (4) Follow the facility’s escalation policy for clinical validation.
A California-based healthcare services provider and several of its affiliates have agreed to pay $30 million to resolve allegations they submitted inaccurate information about the health status of beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare Advantage Plans, according to the Department of Justice.
Happy National Volunteer Week! This week we celebrate the impact volunteer work has on building stronger communities. We know that our staff have a positive impact while they’re on the job, and we are proud to share a few ways our #PeopleBehindTheNumbers are taking time to volunteer in their own local communities.
Scrutiny of coding compliance in the growing ambulatory surgical center (ASC) market has increased in recent years from both Medicare and private payers. This will only increase as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) moves towards value-based care.
Patients being admitted for acute renal failure due to dehydration have been happening for many, many years now. Typically what happens is a patient gets dehydrated for one reason or another. Once dehydration sets in, it can quickly start to affect many body organs. This can lead to acute renal/kidney failure/injury.