Coding Tip: Acute Renal/Kidney Failure/Injury vs Dehydration as a Principal Diagnosis
RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS‑P, CIRCC
Executive Director Of Education
AHIMA‑Approved ICD‑10‑CM/PCS Trainer and Ambassador
Patients being admitted for acute renal failure due to dehydration have been happening for many, many years now. Typically what happens is a patient gets dehydrated for one reason or another. Once dehydration sets in, it can quickly start to affect many body organs. One of these is the kidneys. This can lead to acute renal/kidney failure/injury.
Dehydration results from excessive water loss from body tissues. Etiologies include but are not limited to extensive vomiting, diarrhea, gastroenteritis, renal or adrenal disease, diabetes mellitus, diuretic therapy, or having an ileostomy or colostomy. Symptoms include diminished skin turgor or a “tenting” of the skin, dry oral mucosa and skin, a shrunken tongue, tachycardia, low central venous pressure, postural hypotension, and in severe cases, disorientation and shock. Lab tests that help diagnose dehydration are elevated BUN, elevated Hgb and hematocrit, elevated potassium and decreased sodium. Treatment is IV fluids and sodium, usually at a high IV rates 125cc/hr to 250cc/hr. However, the size of the patient will dictate how much fluid and what rate it is infused. So there is no hard and fast rule. Sometimes fluid boluses are given right away to address significant dehydration.
Dehydration is coded to E86.0, Dehydration, and results in DRGs:
641, Misc disorders of nutrition, metabolism, fluids/electrolytes w/o MCC, Weight 0.7519
640, Misc disorders of nutrition, metabolism, fluids/electrolytes w MCC, Weight 1.1902
Acute Kidney Failure/Injury
Acute renal/kidney failure or injury is a sudden, severe onset of inadequate kidney function. There are many causes of acute renal/kidney failure/injury, however, when due to dehydration, it is because there is decreased renal blood flow from lower blood pressure because of the dehydration. This starts causing functioning problems with the kidney. Symptoms include oliguria, edema resulting from salt and water overload, nausea and vomiting, lethargy from the toxic effects of the waste products building up, hydronephrosis and at times metabolic acidosis. BUN and creatinine will be significantly elevated. There are several types of criteria for acute kidney failure/injury and some hospitals compile their own.
Some well known clinical criteria for validating this diagnosis are:
- RIFLE (Risk of renal dysfunction, Injury to kidney, Failure or Loss of kidney function,
and End-stage kidney disease)
- AKIN (Acute Kidney Injury Network stage)
- KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes group)
Treatment involves treating the underlying cause, and if due to dehydration, that means treating the dehydration with fluids. Renal function (BUN, creatinine) would be followed and monitored along with fluid intake. Acute kidney failure/injury can be life threatening if severe as the kidneys can shut down.
Acute renal failure/injury is coded N17.9, acute kidney failure, unspecified and if PDX leads to these DRGs:
684, Renal failure w/o CC/MCC Weight 0.6198
683, Renal failure w CC Weight 0.919.
682, Renal failure w MCC Weight 1.4532
Past advice is now superseded
There is a very old Coding Clinic, Third Quarter 2002, pages 21-22 with two questions involving acute renal/kidney failure due to dehydration. In both questions, AHA advised to report the acute renal/kidney failure/injury code as the principal diagnosis. Coders have been following that advice since it was published. Until now.
In Coding Clinic First Quarter 2019 page 12, AHA is now stating that there is no rule that acute renal/kidney failure/injury should always be sequenced first in these situations. They now are stating the sequencing of either dehydration or acute renal/kidney failure/injury should be based on the reason for admission. If it cannot be determined, or is not clearly documented, the physician should be queried.
What is a coder to do?
This is now a dilemma. Best practice is for the coder to look at both conditions documented clinically and carefully, remembering that every patient is different. Review the admission order to see if the physician is indicating the exact reason for admission. Look at the ED record and observation record to see what was treated and resolved before true inpatient admission. Look at the clinical indicators to see if both of the diagnoses are solidly supported by the documentation. Is one condition documented more acutely than the other? For example, in looking at the serum creatinine, was the increase only 25% and creatinine at 1.9 which is not twice the patient’s baseline? Was BUN only slightly elevated from the patient’s baseline? Were IV fluid boluses immediately given and IV set at 175 cc/hr? This may indicate that the dehydration was more of an acute reason for admission than acute renal failure/injury. Then there is the question of true acute renal/kidney failure/injury clinical validation in the case.
CDI professionals will also have to be sure physicians are documenting clinical indicators that would support acute renal/kidney failure/injury rather than only kidney insufficiency, which is coded differently and affects DRG assignment. Also, medications can sometimes affect the BUN and creatinine and it may not be a true indication of acute renal/kidney failure/injury. The coder should not be shy about escalating a case to CDI or a physician adviser if either diagnosis does not seem to be clinically validated, as this is part of a coder’s responsibility.
As can be seen in the DRGs above, choosing one of these diagnoses over the other as PDX can impact reimbursement. Having an MCC code on the record can also change up the DRG assigned and reimbursement. And of course surgical procedures can further change the DRG. It will be critically important that coders know the clinical indicators that validate these diagnoses, treatments rendered, and also remember that every patient is different. There is not one “across the board” answer as to what diagnosis is PDX for every patient who is admitted with acute renal/kidney failure/injury and dehydration.
Coding Clinic, First Quarter, 2019, page 12
The information contained in this post is valid at the time of posting. Viewers are encouraged to research subsequent official guidance in the areas associated with the topic as they can change rapidly.
The question asked in a physician query may be the most important element of the document. Query questions need to be as simple and concise as possible. The physician should have no doubt what the coder is asking.
Coding complications of transplanted organs has always been a coding dilemma. With the implementation of ICD-10-CM that didn’t change. However, coders have multiple directives to help in determining what a complication of the transplant is vs. non-transplant conditions and diseases.
We interviewed our most productive coders, reviewers and members of our education team, asking them what steps they take to find a rhythm that works for them. This week, we talked with Beth Martilik, MA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, Assistant Director of Education, about the steps she takes to find her routine.
With the implementation of ICD-10-CM came more codes for reporting many different conditions and diseases, and atrial fibrillation is one of those. For many years there was only one code available for reporting this condition, even when the physician further specified the type of atrial fibrillation that the patient had. In ICD-10-CM, there are four codes to report atrial fibrillation.
We have a case where the physician removes mucoid casts found during bronchoscopy. We have also seen mucus plugs removed during bronchoscopy. The MD performs bronchial washings then removes a large amount of tenacious and thick mucoid casts via bronchoscopy. Is this coded drainage, extirpation or excision? What body part is used?
The key to making the query process more efficient is to look for words or documentation while reviewing the record that may signal a potential query opportunity and to note the finding at that time. By the time a coder reaches the end of a record, documentation may have been found to eliminate the need for the query.
Question: This patient is noted to have “Lymphangitic carcinomatosis of lungs with mediastinal lymph nodes.” How would I code the diagnosis? Would I code metastatic cancer to the lung (C78.01) or metastatic cancer to the lymph nodes (C77.1)?
Coding these can be challenging for coders when trying to decipher the operative notes and terms that are used. The physicians are still using the terms excision and resection interchangeably and review of the entire operative note is required to select the appropriate root operation. Remember, it is the coder’s responsibility to determine the root operation based on the details from the physician in the operative report.
This would be considered a “mechanical” complication of the stent graft since the MD states it is a fracture of the endograft and it is folded over on itself. I would change T82.898A TO T82.598A for Other mechanical complication of other cardiac and vascular devices and implants, initial encounter. I did not use “displacement” because the surgeon did not state that the graft was displaced, only that it collapsed upon itself causing obstruction.
We interviewed our most productive coders and reviewers, asking them what steps they take to find a rhythm that works for them. This week, we talked with Valerie Abney, CDIP, RHIT, CCS, about the steps she takes to find her routine.
Osteoporosis alone is responsible for over a million fractures every year. Stress fractures are not as common but they do occur. There are more than 1 million total joint replacements in the U.S. each year, so there was a need to create codes for injuries that occur around or near the prosthesis. These are called “periprosthetic” fractures.
Back in April, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) published a report detailing its findings from a review of two groups of high-risk diagnosis codes, acute stroke and major depressive disorder. The objective was to determine whether selected diagnosis codes submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for use in CMS’s risk adjustment program complied with Federal requirements.
There seems to be differences of opinions on the issue of a 40w0day gestation Can you clarify if P08.21 should be assigned for 40w0day infant or if it would not be assigned unless the infant’s gestation age was 40w1day or greater?
Coders may find situations where a patient is documented as meeting SIRS or sepsis criteria, or has some clinical indicators reflective of possible sepsis, but the physician never documents sepsis as a diagnosis. Should the coder always query for sepsis in these instances?
In this example, would it be appropriate to code the complication code T82.03XA, Leakage of heart valve prosthesis, initial encounter as the principal diagnosis over the HFpEF (heart failure exacerbation) code?
We interviewed our most productive coders and reviewers, asking them what steps they take to find a rhythm that works for them. This week, we talked with Kerry Atkins, CDIP, CCS‑P, COC, CPC, CPCO, CPMA, CEMC, COBGC, RMB, Physician Services Consultant at HIA, about the steps she takes to find her routine.
A higher CMI corresponds to increased consumption of resources and increased cost of patient care, resulting in increased reimbursement to the facility from government and private payers, like CMS. We know that documentation directly impacts coding.
With the implementation of ICD-10-PCS more codes were developed in order to accurately report procedures. Spinal fusion coding is still a problematic coding issue and at times, even a coder’s nightmare. Coders often report only the code for the fusion thinking that one code would include all of the other procedures that are performed.
Answer: I would code 0HPT0NZ for removal of tissue expander from right breast, open and change 0HPT0JZ, removal of synthetic substitute from right breast, open, for removal of the acellular dermal matrix to 0HPT0KZ, Removal of nonautologous tissue substitute from right breast, open approach.
There are certain conditions that have instructional notes in the ICD-10-CM tabular/coding conventions that guide the coder in sequencing. This is especially true when the condition has a common manifestation or underlying conditions of a chronic disease. If there is a “code first” note in the tabular, the coder should follow this instruction and sequence the underlying etiology or chronic condition first followed by the manifestation as an additional diagnosis.
When it comes to coding and documentation, finding your own rhythm can lead to positive results. For our series, Find Your Routine, we interviewed our most productive coders and reviewers and asked them what steps they take to find a rhythm that works for them. This week, we talked with Meghan Schumacher, CPC, CPMA, Provider Coding Consultant at Health Information Associates, Inc., about the steps she takes to find her routine.
Last year, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) performed an investigation that found, “between 2014 and 2016, Medicare Advantage organizations overturned 75% of their preauthorization and payment denials upon appeal,” which is why, at HIA, we always advise our clients to engage in the appeals process.
There may be instances where a coder will suspect the patient has acute kidney injury (AKI), but the physician has failed to document the diagnosis. In another scenario, the physician may have made the diagnosis, but there is a question of clinical validity. In either case, a query would be justified.
How many times have you heard “it only takes one code to get the claim paid”? With the emphasis on the severity of illness and the move toward value-based reimbursement in today’s healthcare climate, it is more important than ever for coders to report all applicable diagnoses. There are three important pieces: what the provider documents, how to the coder interprets that documentation and codes it, and then how it is extrapolated.
The reimbursement landscape is already a complicated one – and the highly-complex claims denials process only adds fuel to the fire. A denied claim is one that has been determined by a payor to be in appropriate. Once a coding specialist amends the errors on a rejected claim, they can resubmit it for consideration. The time-intensive process has a significant impact on the cash flow for any setting in the healthcare environment. They are also very costly to appeal.
When a practitioner documents a diagnosis that does not appear to be supported by the clinical indicators in the health record, a coder has four choices: (1) Code the diagnosis; (2) Ignore the diagnosis; (3) Generate a query to confirm clinical validation of a diagnosis; (4) Follow the facility’s escalation policy for clinical validation.
A California-based healthcare services provider and several of its affiliates have agreed to pay $30 million to resolve allegations they submitted inaccurate information about the health status of beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare Advantage Plans, according to the Department of Justice.
Happy National Volunteer Week! This week we celebrate the impact volunteer work has on building stronger communities. We know that our staff have a positive impact while they’re on the job, and we are proud to share a few ways our #PeopleBehindTheNumbers are taking time to volunteer in their own local communities.
Scrutiny of coding compliance in the growing ambulatory surgical center (ASC) market has increased in recent years from both Medicare and private payers. This will only increase as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) moves towards value-based care.